|
|
|
|
|
|
| Effects of Orientation and Quality on Spatial Spectrum Characteristics of Fruits in Southern Xinjiang |
| XU Jia-yi1, 3, HUANG Xue2, 3, LUO Hua-ping1, 3*, LIU Jin-xiu1, 3, SUO Yu-ting1, 3, WANG Chang-xu1, 3 |
1. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
2. College of Plant Science，Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
3. The Key Laboratory of Colleges and Universities under the Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region，Alar 843300, China
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Hyperspectral nondestructive testing technology is widely used in quantitative nondestructive testing of fruit. In this paper, the spatial characteristic spectra of jujube, grape and pear are taken as the research objectives, and the influencing factors and inversion methods of spatial characteristic spectra are explored, which provides a new idea for improving the accuracy of outdoor fruit nondestructive testing. The spectral library of three kinds of fruits was extracted, and the spatial characteristic spectra were calculated. The characteristic wavelengths were selected by Mahalanobis distance, concentration residual and competitive adaptive weight sampling algorithm. Model characteristic spectra of three kinds of fruits after pretreatment with quality parameters and positional parameters respectively.The modeling results are as follows: In the sugar model, the R of jujube, grape and pear were 0.853 3, 0.822 7 and 0.913 3 respectively; In the water model, the R were 0.741 3, 0.784 7 and 0.891 3 respectively; In the detection angle model, the R were 0.985 6, 0.992 7 and 0.974 7 respectively; In the azimuth angle model, the R were 0.941 8, 0.910 5 and 0.936 9 respectively; In the phase angle model, the R were 0.960 9, 0.957 0 and 0.956 3 respectively. In summary, the correlation of different fruit positional models was significantly higher than quality models. Therefore, the positional factor is the main reason affecting the characteristic spectrum. Therefore, the roujean model and waltall model are used to invert the characteristic spatial spectrum of different directions. The inversion results are as follows: roujean model is used when retrieving the spatial characteristic spectra of three kinds of fruits (in the order of jujube, grape and pear), R2 is 0.934 4, 0.928 1 and 0.830 6 respectively; R is 0.990 2, 0.983 9 and 0.969 1 respectively; RMSEP is 0.030 9, 0.048 7 and 0.062 7 respectively; the average model error is 7.27%, 11.02% and 8.61% respectively. The results showed that R2 was 0.943 3, 0.859 7, 0.839 0; R was 0.991 8, 0.971 8, 0.970 2; RMSEP was 0.036 6, 0.066 1, 0.068 7; the average model error was 6.19%, 15.40%, 7.84%. It can be seen that roujean model can well describe the characteristic spatial spectrum of jujube and grape, and also can better describe the characteristic spatial spectrum of pear; waltall model can well describe the characteristic spatial spectrum of jujube, and also can better describe the characteristic spatial spectrum of grape and pear. In conclusion, roujean model can be used to invert the characteristic spatial spectrum of grape and pear, and waltall model can be used to invert the characteristic spatial spectrum of jujube to improve the accuracy of outdoor fruit nondestructive testing.
|
|
Received: 2021-02-02
Accepted: 2021-03-15
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LUO Hua-ping
E-mail: luohuaping739@163.com
|
|
[1] WANG Dong, WANG Kun, WU Jing-zhu, et al(王 冬, 王 坤, 吴静珠, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(1): 52.
[2] Yang Peiyan, Zhuo min, Zhang M. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 148：118991.
[3] Shinichi Inoue, Masanori Maki, Norimichi Tsumura. JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL, 2020, 73(10): 1022.
[4] Luongo A, Falster V, Doest M B, et al. Computer Graphics Forum, 2020, 39(1): 347.
[5] ZHANG Ying-luo, WANG Ying-min, HUANG Ai-ping, et al(张英珞，王英民，黄爱平，等). Optoelectronics Letters(光电子快报)，2020，16(2)：137.
[6] Jong-Min Yeom, Jean-Louis Roujean, Kyung-Soo Han, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 239：111610.
[7] Farhad M M, Morakot Kaewmanee, Larry Leigh, et al. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12：806.
[8] Aval J, Alfalou A, Brosseau C. Optical Society of America, 2019, 11(2): 10.
[9] Zhou Qu, Tian Liqiao, Li Jian, et al. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2020, 160(12): 733.
[10] WU Hong-yi, TONG Ling(吴宏伊，童 玲). Chinese Optics Letters, 2011, 9(10): 83.
[11] Gong Chizhang, Henning Budden baum, Rebecca Retzlaff, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(21): 2561.
[12] Wierzbicki D, Kedzierski M, Fryskowska A, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(9): 1348.
|
| [1] |
SUO Yu-ting1，2, LUO Hua-ping1，2*, LIU Jin-xiu1，2, LI Wei1，2, CHEN Chong3, XU Jia-yi1，2, WANG Chang-xu1，2. A Comparative Study on Roujean and Ross Li Models of Winter Jujube in South Xinjiang Under Different Outdoor Light[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1737-1744. |
| [2] |
SUO Yu-ting1，2, LUO Hua-ping1，2*, LI Wei1，2，WANG Chang-xu1，2, XU Jia-yi1，2. Study on the Adaptability of Polarization Parameter Model of Winter Jujube in South Xinjiang to Outdoor Light Conditions[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(01): 223-228. |
|
|
|
|
