|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectral Discrimination of Rabbit Liver VX2 Tumor and Normal Tissue Based on Genetic Algorithm-Support Vector Machine |
LIU Chen-yang1,2, XU Huang-rong2,3, DUAN Feng4, WANG Tai-sheng1, LU Zhen-wu1, YU Wei-xing3* |
1. State Key Laboratory of Applied Optics, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics & Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Key Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology, Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Xi’an 710119, China
4. Department of Interventional Radiology, the General Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Beijing 100853, China |
|
|
Abstract Rabbit liver VX2 tumor is a tumor model that can grow rapidly in various organs, such as liver, lung, rectum, etc., and is often used in tumor research. In this paper, using high-near-infrared spectrum technology to four rabbits VX2 liver tumor and normal tissue in vivo and in vitro reflection spectrum detection, then respectively the Two categories based on support vector machine (normal liver tissue and liver VX2 tumor tissue) and Four categories (not bleeding living normal liver tissue, not living liver VX2 tumor tissue bleeding, bleeding in vitro normal liver tissue and hemorrhage in vitro liver VX2 tumor tissue). According to its spectral reflection curve characteristics, the data in the range of 400~1 800 nm are selected as characteristic variables. In order to further improve the classification accuracy, the kernel parameter g and penalty factor c of the support vector machine was optimized by using a 50 fold cross-validation and genetic algorithm, respectively. The optimization parameters and classification results of the 50-fold cross-validation are as follows: penalty parameter c of the dichotomy optimization is 4, kernel parameter g is 0.125 0, and the accuracy of the correction set and prediction set reaches 100%. The optimized parameters c and g are 8 and 0.121 1, and the accuracy of the correction set and the prediction set are 99.242 4% and 93.33 3%, respectively. The optimized parameters and results of the genetic algorithm are as follows: the optimized parameters c and g in dichotomy are 0.845 6 and 0.062 5, respectively, and the accuracy of Two categories, the correction set and the prediction set, is agreed to reach 100%.The optimized parameter C in the Four categories was 5.530 7 and g was 0.068 5, and the accuracy of the correction set and the prediction set reached 99.242 4% and 100%, respectively. The results show that the two optimization methods have achieved good results, and the genetic algorithm is more accurate in the classification of the Four categories. In order to further improve the speed of the algorithm, the method of variable selection at intervals was adopted to reduce the characteristic variables continuously. Finally, a variable was selected for every 100 nm spectral segment, and a total of 14 spectral segments were selected as the characteristic variables. Parameters of support vector machine were optimized by using genetic algorithm for the classification was studied, the results show that the Two categories and Four categories of both results of the calibration set and prediction set were 99.242 4%, and the running time of 11.4 s and 20.0 s respectively, and choosing all band running time: 340.3 s and 491.0 s compared to how spectroscopy can be in the identification of hepatic VX2 tumor tissue and normal liver tissue. The classification accuracy rate can reach more than 99%, and the running time shorten a lot. Therefore, it also lays a foundation for realising rapid real-time online detection and classification of tumor tissues in the future clinical tumor diagnosis with multi-spectrum technology, showing great application potential.
|
Received: 2020-09-11
Accepted: 2021-01-15
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
YU Wei-xing
E-mail: yuwx@opt.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Buijs M, Vossen J A, Geschwind J F, et al. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 2011, 22(8): 1175.
[2] Kang B, Choi W S, Kang J H, et al. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 2020, 31(3): 503.
[3] Depciuch J, Stanek-Widera A, Lange D, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2018, 204:18.
[4] Ferreira I C C, Aguiar E M G, Silva A T F, et al. J. Oncol., 2020, 2020: 4343590.
[5] Sun X, Xu Y, Wu J, et al. J. Surg. Res., 2013, 179(1): 33.
[6] Zhang W T, Tian P R, Zhu Q, et al. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2015, 31(2): 198.
[7] Saira K A, Safiullah A, Krishna Mohan S, et al. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2018, 9(3): 1056.
[8] Fischer C, Hsieh E. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2017, 80: 14.
[9] Kaur K, Yadav P K, Bumbrah G S, et al. Vib. Spectrosc., 2020, 110: 103146.
[10] Sim J Y, Ahn C G, Jeong E J, et al. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8(1): 1059.
[11] Schleif F-M, Lindemann M, Diaz M, et al. Computing and Visualization in Science, 2008, 12(4): 189.
[12] Duan F, Yuan J, Liu X, et al. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol., 2019, 11(1): 1.
[13] Lü P, Liu J, Yan X, et al. Eur. Radiol., 2017, 27(3): 918.
[14] Khazaee A, Ebrahimzadeh A. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2010, 5(4): 252.
[15] Saidi L, Ben Ali J, Fnaiech F. ISA Trans., 2015, 54: 193. |
[1] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[2] |
GAO Wei-ling, ZHANG Kai-hua*, XU Yan-fen, LIU Yu-fang*. Data Processing Method for Multi-Spectral Radiometric Thermometry Based on the Improved HPSOGA[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3659-3665. |
[3] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[4] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[5] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[6] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[7] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[8] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
[9] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
[10] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
[11] |
LÜ Shi-lei1, 2, 3, WANG Hong-wei1, LI Zhen1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Xu1, ZHAO Jing1. Hyperspectral Identification Model of Cantonese Tangerine Peel Based on BWO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2894-2901. |
[12] |
WANG Jun-jie1, YUAN Xi-ping2, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, ZHAO Hai-long1. Hyperspectral Identification Method of Typical Sedimentary Rocks in Lufeng Dinosaur Valley[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2855-2861. |
[13] |
TANG Ruo-han1, 2, LI Xiu-hua1, 2*, LÜ Xue-gang1, 2, ZHANG Mu-qing2, 3, YAO Wei2, 3. Transmittance Vis-NIR Spectroscopy for Detecting Fibre Content of
Living Sugarcane[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2419-2425. |
[14] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[15] |
NIU Fang-peng1, 2, LI Xin-guo1, 3*, BAI Yun-gang2, ZHAO Hui4. Hyperspectral Estimation Model of Soil Organic Carbon Content Based on Genetic Algorithm Fused With Continuous Projection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2232-2237. |
|
|
|
|