高分六号宽幅数据识别火烧迹地的光谱及指数分析

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)08-2536-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2290 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This study aims to explore the appropriate spectral bands and indices of GF-6 WFV data in identifying burned areas. The study area is located in three burned areas in the Greater Khingan Mountains forest region of Inner Mongolia of China. 11 indexes, including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Global Environment Monitoring Index (GEMI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Burned Area Index (BAI), Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Modified Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI), Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index (MTCI), Normalized Difference Red Edge Index 1 (NDRE1), Modified Chlorophyll Absorption Ratio Index 2 (MCARI2) and Modified Normalized Difference Soil Index (MNDSI) were selected according to the channels of GF-6 WFV data. To quantitatively evaluate the ability of selected spectral indexes and modified indexes to identify burned areas, the separability M was calculated between burned areas and other typical categories based on single-temporal and bi-temporal images. Then these 11 indexes and their differenced indexes were used to identify the burned areas. The results show that (1) the near-infrared band of GF-6 WFV and the two newly added red-edge bands provided better spectral separation, indicating an ability to reflect the characteristics of burned areas. (2) In terms of distinguishing between the same area before and after burned, NDVI, GEMI, EVI, BAI, SAVI, MSAVI and NDWI improved performance. Among four modified indexes, NDRE1 and MCARI2 performed better than MNDSI and MTCI. (3) As for distinguishing burned areas from other typical categories, BAI, NDVI, MCARI2 and NDWI performed better, followed by NDRE1, GEMI, EVI, SAVI and MSAVI, while MNDSI and MTCI performing poorly. (4) In extracting burned areas using indexes and differenced indexes, GEMI, EVI, BAI, SAVI and MSAVI performed better, followed by MCARI2, NDVI and NDWI with medium performance, while MTCI, MNDSI and NDRE1 performing poorly. In summary, BAI and GEMI had the best performance in identifying burned areas, followed by NDVI, EVI, SAVI, MSAVI, NDWI and MCARI2 with medium identification ability, while three modified indices MNDSI, NDRE1 and MTCI performing poorly.

Key words：GF-6 WFV data; Spectral index; Modified index; Separability index M; Burned area

Received: 2020-12-15 Accepted: 2021-04-04

ZTFLH:

TP79

Corresponding Authors: QIN Xian-lin E-mail: noaags@ifrit.ac.cn

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2021)08-2536-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2021/V41/I08/2536

[1] Liang S L. Comprehensive Remote Sensing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018: 13.
[2] SUN Gui-fen, QIN Xian-lin, LIU Shu-chao, et al（孙桂芬, 覃先林, 刘树超, 等）. Remote Sensing For Land & Resources（国土资源遥感）, 2019, 31(1): 204.
[3] Veraverbeke S, Harris S, Hook S. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(10): 2702.
[4] WU Li-ye, SHEN Run-ping, LI Xin-hui, et al（吴立叶, 沈润平, 李鑫慧, 等）. Remote Sensing Technology and Application（遥感技术与应用）, 2014, 29(4): 567.
[5] LI Ying, YU Hai-yang, WANG Yan, et al（李莹, 于海洋, 王燕, 等）. Remote Sensing Information（遥感信息）, 2019, 34(5): 63.
[6] ZHU Xi, QIN Xian-lin（朱曦, 覃先林）. Remote Sensing Technology and Application（遥感技术与应用）, 2013, 28(1): 72.
[7] WU Jin-wen, FENG Rui, SUN Long-yu, et al（武晋雯, 冯锐, 孙龙彧，等）. Journal of Catastrophology（灾害学）, 2018, 33(4): 53.
[8] QIN Xian-lin, LI Xiao-tong, LIU Shu-chao, et al（覃先林, 李晓彤, 刘树超, 等）. Journal of Remote Sensing（遥感学报）, 2020, 24(5): 511.
[9] FANG Can-ying, WANG Lin, XU Han-qiu（方灿莹, 王琳, 徐涵秋）. Journal of Geo-information Science（地球信息科学学报）, 2017, 19(10): 1382.
[10] ZHANG Qin-yu, LI Zhe, XIA Chao-zong, et al（张沁雨, 李哲, 夏朝宗, 等）. Journal of Geo-Information Science（地球信息科学学报）, 2019, 21(10): 1619.
[11] LING Cheng-xing, JU Hong-bo, ZHANG Huai-qing, et al（凌成星, 鞠洪波, 张怀清, 等）. Forest Research（林业科学研究）, 2014, 27(5): 639.
[12] Smith A M S, Drake N A, Woosterj M J, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2007, 28(12): 2753.
[13] ZHAO Ying-shi, et al（赵英时, 等）. Principles and Methods of Remote Sensing Application Analysis（遥感应用分析原理与方法）. 2nd ed（第2版）. Beijing: Science Press（北京: 科学出版社）, 2013. 23.
[14] Boschetti M, Stroppiana D, Brivio P A. Earth Interactions，2010, 14(17): 1.
[15] Dennison P E, Roberts D A. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(8): 1646.
[16] Long T, Zhang Z, He G, et al. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(5): 489.
[17] Bastarrika A，Alvarado M，Artano K, et al. Remote Sensing，2014, 6(12): 12360.