|
|
|
|
|
|
| Optimization of IBBCEAS Spectral Retrieval Range Based on Machine Learning and Genetic Algorithm |
| LING Liu-yi1,3*, HUANG You-rui1,2*, WANG Chen-jun1, HU Ren-zhi3, LI Ang3, XIE Pin-hua3 |
1. School of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
2. Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, China
3. Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics & Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS) can highly sensitively detect trace gases by using an optical resonator to enhance the absorption path. At present, IBBCEAS mainly uses light-emitting diode (LED) as its incoherent light source. The fitting result of the measured gas concentration with improper spectral retrieval range may have a large deviation if the reflectivity curve of the resonator’s mirror does not match well with the LED radiation spectrum with limited bandwidth. Taking the case of quantitative detection for atmospheric NO2, the influence of retrieval range on NO2 fitting results is analyzed. It is found that the relative fitting error will increase rapidly when the retrieval range is narrowed to a certain extent. In this paper, a method for optimizing retrieval range based on machine learning using RBF neural network and genetic algorithm is proposed in order to minimize the error. 435 sample data are obtained by retrieving NO2 concentrations with various spectral subranges, which are members of 430~480 nm and have different widths and center wavelengths. 80% of the sample data are used to train the RBF neural network, and the rest for the testing network. The nonlinear mapping relationship between input parameters, starting and ending wavelengths of retrieval range, and output parameter, relative fitting error, is obtained by the trained network. The optimal retrieval range is searched using a genetic algorithm, in which starting and ending wavelength of the retrieval range are encoded into an individual, and a population is generated with a number of random individuals. After the evolution of multi-generation populations, the optimal retrieval range is obtained by the genetic algorithm, which uses the output of the RBF neural network, i.e. relative fitting error, as individual fitness. Every population has 100 individuals, and the maximum evolution generation is set to 100. When the populations evolve in the 61st generation, the optimal individual, corresponding to 445.78~479.44 nm of the optimal retrieval range, appears, and the optimal fitness is 3.584%. The NO2 fitting results with the other four typical and the optimal retrieval ranges with the same width are compared. The results show that fitting error, relative fitting error and standard deviation of fitting residual with the optimal retrieval range are lower than those with the other four retrieval ranges. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using machine learning to determine the optimal retrieval range of an IBBCEAS system.
|
|
Received: 2020-06-10
Accepted: 2020-09-30
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LING Liu-yi, HUANG You-rui
E-mail: lyling@aust.edu.cn；hyr628@163.com
|
|
[1] Fang B, Zhao W X, Xu X Z, et al. Optics Express, 2017, 25(12): 26910.
[2] Min K E, Washenfelder R A, Dube W P, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2016, 9(2): 423.
[3] Liang S X, Qin M, Xie P H, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2019, 12(4): 2499.
[4] DUAN Jun, QIN Min, FANG Wu, et al(段 俊, 秦 敏, 方 武, 等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2015, 64(18): 180701.
[5] LIANG Shuai-xi, QIN Min, DUAN Jun, et al(梁帅西, 秦 敏, 段 俊, 等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2017, 66(9): 090704.
[6] Yi H M, Wu T, Wang G S, et al. Optics Express, 2016, 24(10): A781.
[7] Duan J, Qin M, Ouyang B, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2018, 11(7): 4531.
[8] Jordan N, Ye C Z, Ghosh S, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2019, 12(2): 1277.
[9] Liu J W, Li X, Yang Y M, et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 92(3): 2697.
[10] Washenfelder R A, Attwooda A R, Flores J M, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2016, 9(1): 41.
[11] Bahrini C, Gregoire A C, Obada D, et al. Optics Laser Technol., 2018, 108(12): 466.
[12] Meng L S, Wang G X, Augustin P, et al. Optics Lett., 2020, 45(7): 1611.
[13] Lamgridge J M, Ball S M, Shillings A J L, et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2008, 79(12): 123110.
[14] LING Liu-yi, WEI Ying, HUANG You-rui, et al(凌六一, 韦 颖, 黄友锐, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2018, 38(3): 670. |
| [1] |
BAO Hao1, 2，ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
| [2] |
LAN Yan1，WANG Wu1，XU Wen2，CHAI Qin-qin1*，LI Yu-rong1，ZHANG Xun2. Discrimination of Planting and Tissue-Cultured Anoectochilus Roxburghii Based on SMOTE and Inception-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 158-163. |
| [3] |
GAO Wei-ling, ZHANG Kai-hua*, XU Yan-fen, LIU Yu-fang*. Data Processing Method for Multi-Spectral Radiometric Thermometry Based on the Improved HPSOGA[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3659-3665. |
| [4] |
CHENG Gang1, CAO Ya-nan1, TIAN Xing1, CAO Yuan2, LIU Kun2. Simulation of Airflow Performance and Parameter Optimization of
Photoacoustic Cell Based on Orthogonal Test[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3899-3905. |
| [5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
| [6] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
| [7] |
FANG Zheng, WANG Han-bo. Measurement of Plastic Film Thickness Based on X-Ray Absorption
Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3461-3468. |
| [8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
| [9] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
| [10] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
| [11] |
LI Zhong-bing1, 2, JIANG Chuan-dong2, LIANG Hai-bo3, DUAN Hong-ming2, PANG Wei2. Rough and Fine Selection Strategy Binary Gray Wolf Optimization
Algorithm for Infrared Spectral Feature Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3067-3074. |
| [12] |
LI Xin1, LIU Jiang-ping1, 2*, HUANG Qing1, HU Peng-wei1, 2. Optimization of Prediction Model for Milk Fat Content Based on Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2779-2784. |
| [13] |
LÜ Shi-lei1, 2, 3, WANG Hong-wei1, LI Zhen1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Xu1, ZHAO Jing1. Hyperspectral Identification Model of Cantonese Tangerine Peel Based on BWO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2894-2901. |
| [14] |
CHEN Wen-jing, XU Nuo, JIAO Zhao-hang, YOU Jia-hua, WANG He, QI Dong-li, FENG Yu*. Study on the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer by Fluorescence Spectrometry Based on Machine Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2407-2412. |
| [15] |
JIN Hua-wei1, 2, 3, WANG Hao-wei1, 2, LUO Ping1, 2, FANG Lei1, 2. Simulation Design and Performance Analysis of Two-Stage Buffer
Photoacoustic Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2375-2380. |
|
|
|
|
