|
|
|
|
|
|
| Infrared Spectroscopic Image Segmentation Based on Neural Immune Network With Growing Immune Field |
| ZHOU Zi-jie1, ZHANG Bao-feng2*, YU Xiao2* |
1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China
2. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Pipeline transportation has great advantages in long-distance transportation of oil and gas, and it is crucial to detect pipeline safety. In order to ensure the effective detection of the pipeline condition at any time, infrared imaging technology is of great significance in the field of pipeline detection because it can reflect the characteristics of the target according to the thermal radiation information of the object and ignore the influence of visible light.However, due to the diversity of the outdoor environment, infrared pipeline images have many problems, such as the uneven distribution of target features, pipeline occlusion and background target interference. These problems increase the difficulty of extracting pipeline targets, which is not conducive to the segmentation and detection of pipelines. The biological immune system exhibits excellent recognition, learning, memory, tolerance and coordination in antigen detection, extraction and elimination. These characteristics are lacking in current complex system optimization strategies. Based on the biological nervous system’s mechanism regulating immune system, a neural immune network is designed to detect and extract infrared pipeline targets in complex background. According to the regulatory mechanism of the biological neural network in the immune system, the neural network for infrared pipeline target location is constructed using the basic pipeline shape feature model. In this paper, three typical infrared pipeline images are selected, and the traditional target detection algorithm is compared with the algorithm based on neural immune network. The true positive rate of the traditional target detection algorithm is 0.405 6, and the neural immune network algorithm is 0.980 5. The Jaccard similarity coefficient of the traditional target detection algorithm is 0.271 8, and the neural immune network algorithm is 0.944 4. The absolute error rate is 0.117 5, and the neural immune network algorithm is 0.011 8. The results show that the true positive rate of the neural immune network algorithm is 0.574 9 higher than that of the traditional algorithm, and the absolute error rate is 0.105 7 lower. It proves that the proposed algorithm can extract the complete infrared pipeline target more accurately than the traditional method in the complex background. This network structure can improve the detection efficiency for pipeline safety.
|
|
Received: 2020-05-14
Accepted: 2020-08-02
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Bao-feng, YU Xiao
E-mail: zhangbaofeng@263.net; yx_tjut@163.com
|
|
[1] Yang N, Yuan M, Wang P, et al. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 2019.
[2] Zhang J, Wang Y. Semiconductor Optoelectronics, 2016, 37(1): 126.
[3] Prakash R M, Bhuvaneshwari K, Divya M, et al. 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), 2017, 1.
[4] Bai X, Wang Y, Liu H, et al. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 26(4):1946.
[5] Li L, Zhou F, Bai X. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 99: 1.
[6] Fuliang H, Yongcai G, Chao G. Optics & Laser Technology, 2019, 110: 114.
[7] Wei L, Yi-Wei C, Microbiology D O. Progress in Biochemistry & Biophysics, 2017, 44(12): 1066.
[8] Fu D, Sun J. Proceedings of 2017 9th International Conference On Modelling, Identification and Control, 2017, 1026.
[9] Yu X, Zhou Z, Gao Q, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2018, 88: 184.
[10] Yu Xiao, Zhou Zijie, Kamil Riha. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2018, 38(11): 3645.
[11] Chavan S S, Pavlov V A, Tracey K J. Immunity, 2017, 46(6): 927.
[12] Ribeiro-Da-Silva M, Vasconcelos D M, Alencastre I S, et al. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1).
[13] Pavlov V A, Tracey K J. Nature Neuroscience, 2017, 20(2): 156.
[14] Sébastien Talbot, Foster S L, Woolf C J. Annual Review of Immunology, 2016, 34(1): 421.
[15] Ayesha O, Anam N, Aqsa I, et al. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 8874. |
| [1] |
ZHANG Qian1, YANG Ying1*, LIU Gang1, 2, 3, WU Xiao1, NING Yuan-lin1. Detection of Dairy Cow Mastitis From Thermal Images by Data Enhancement and Improved ResNet34[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 280-288. |
| [2] |
ZHU Wen-qing1, 2, 3, ZHANG Ning1, 2, 3, LI Zheng1, 2, 3*, LIU Peng1, 3, TANG Xin-yi1, 3. A Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network for Infrared and Visible Multi-Resolution Image Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 289-296. |
| [3] |
WANG Zhi-fen1, JIA Wei-kuan1,2*, MOU Shan-hao1, HOU Su-juan1,2, YIN Xiang3, ZE Ji4. KDC: A Green Apple Segmentation Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2980-2988. |
| [4] |
LIU You-fu, XIAO De-qin*, WANG Chun-tao. Fertilized Eggs’ Air-Cell Change Monitoring Algorithm Based on Thermal-Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 572-578. |
| [5] |
LIU Cui-ling1, 2, WANG Shao-min1, 2, WU Jing-zhu1, 2, SUN Xiao-rong1, 2. Study on Internal Quality Nondestructive Detection of Sunflower Seed Based on Terahertz Time-Domain Transmission Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3384-3389. |
| [6] |
WANG Zi-jun1, 2, LUO Yuan-yi1, 2*, JIANG Shang-zhi1, 2, XIONG Nan-fei1, 2, WAN Li-tao1, 2. An Improved Algorithm for Adaptive Infrared Image Enhancement Based on Guided Filtering[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3463-3467. |
| [7] |
LONG Yao-wei1, LI Min-zan1, GAO De-hua1, ZHANG Zhi-yong1, SUN Hong1*, Qin Zhang2. Chlorophyll Content Detection Based on Image Segmentation by Plant Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(07): 2253-2258. |
| [8] |
LONG Yao-wei, SUN Hong, GAO De-hua, ZHENG Zhi-yong, LI Min-zan*, YANG Wei. Detection of Crop Chlorophyll Content Based on Spectrum Extraction from Coating Imaging Sensor[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(05): 1581-1587. |
| [9] |
QIU Rong-chao1, LÜ Jun-wei1, GONG Jian1, LOU Shu-li2, XIU Bing-nan1, MA Xin-xing1. Smoothing Method for Sea Surface Rough Background Based on Multi-Spectral Forward-Looking Infrared Images Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(04): 1120-1126. |
| [10] |
SHAO Lei, ZHANG Yi-ming, LI Ji*, LIU Hong-li, CHEN Xiao-qi, YU Xiao*. Research on High Temperature Region Segmentation of Infrared Pipeline Image Based on Improved Two-Dimensional-Otsu[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(05): 1637-1642. |
| [11] |
SUN Hong1, LIU Ning1, WU Li1, ZHENG Tao1, LI Min-zan1*, WU Jing-zhu2. Visualization of Water Content Distribution in Potato Leaves Based on Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(03): 910-916. |
| [12] |
QIU Rong-chao1, LOU Shu-li2, LI Ting-jun1, GONG Jian1. Research on Detection of Ship Target at Sea Based on Multi-Spectral Infrared Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(03): 698-704. |
| [13] |
YU Xiao1, ZHOU Zi-jie1, Kamil Ríha2. Blurred Infrared Image Segmentation Using New Immune Algorithm with Minimum Mean Distance Immune Field[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(11): 3645-3652. |
| [14] |
YUE Jiang1, WANG Zhao-xin1，HAN Jing2, BAI Lian-fa2, LI Bao-ming1*. A Target Extraction Method of Infrared Image Based on Edge and Transition Region[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(06): 1729-1735. |
| [15] |
MA Jun-cheng1, DU Ke-ming1*, ZHENG Fei-xiang1, ZHANG Ling-xian2, SUN Zhong-fu1. A Segmenting Method for Greenhouse Cucumber Downy Mildew Images Based on Visual Spectral and Support Vector Machine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(06): 1863-1868. |
|
|
|
|
