|
|
|
|
|
|
Method for Evaluating Spectral Similarity Based on First-Order Gradient Information |
LIU Shi-jie1, 2, LI Chun-lai1,3*, XU Rui1, TANG Guo-liang1, 2, XU Yan1, 2, 4, WU Bing1, 2, WANG Jian-yu1, 2, 3* |
1. Key Laboratory of Space Active Opto-Electronics Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Shanghai 200083, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China
4. School of Information Science and Techno1ogy, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China |
|
|
Abstract Current evaluation methods for spectral similarity are mainly based on the shapes and amplitudes of spectra, but these two can only reflect the outline information of spectra, and cannot well reflect the fingerprint characteristics of spectra of ground objects. In order to better embody the application of spectral characteristics in the evaluation, it is proposed herein a method for evaluating spectral similarity based on first-order gradient information. Firstly, it is proposed an MSAM similarity evaluation method, further, a modified gradient spectral angle matching (MGSAM) method by adjusting the traditional spectral angle similarity evaluation method SAM. MGSAM compares the gradient angle matching degree of the two spectral curves. The gradient information of the spectral curves can highlight the existence of “fingerprint” characteristics such as spectral absorption peaks, so MGSAM can fully reflect the similarity of the spectral characteristics of the two contrast curves. By analyzing the influence of offset information and spectral depth on MSAM and MGSAM, it is pointed out that MGSAM has stronger robustness to offset information, and can objectively reflect the difference in spectral depth, so as to directly reflect the fidelity of spectral features in the photoelectric systems or related algorithms. By applying MGSAM as the evaluation method to the evaluation of compressed sensing imaging system, the simulation results showed that as the change of sampling rate, the MSAM values ranged between 0.998~1, while MGSAM values ranged between 0.72~1, with obvious change and great difference. It objectively reflects the fidelity ability of the compressed sensing system for spectral features and has a stronger differentiation ability, thereby providing a more objective evaluation method for such systems. By applying MGSAM to the classification of ground objects based on spectral similarity, and selecting Salinas, Pavia and Indian Pines for the test data, the results showed that the average classification accuracy based on MSAM was 0.86, while that based on MGSAM was 0.93. This shows that MGSAM can highlight the role of spectral features in classification and greatly improve the classification accuracy.
|
Received: 2020-02-19
Accepted: 2020-06-20
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LI Chun-lai, WANG Jian-yu
E-mail: jywang@mail.sitp.ac.cn;lichunlai@mail.sitp.ac.cn
|
|
[1] LIU Shi-jie, ZHANG Xu-dong, ZHANG Yue, et al(刘世界, 张旭东, 张 月,等). Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2017, 36(6): 799.
[2] Ding J G, Li X B, Huang L Q. Journal of Engineering Scienceand Technology Review,2015,8(5): 172.
[3] Padma S, Sanjeevi S. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2014, 32: 138.
[4] Nidamanuri R, Zbell B. Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE, 2011, 4(1):226.
[5] SU Ge, XU Rui, WANG Jian-yu(苏 歌,徐 睿,王建宇). Infrared(红外),2016,37(10):23.
[6] Qaisar S, Bilal R M, Iqbal W, et al. Journal of Communication and Networks, 2013, 15(5): 443.
[7] LIU Shi-jie, LI Chun-lai, XU Rui, et al(刘世界, 李春来, 徐 睿,等). Acta Optica(光学学报) , 2020, 40(1): 0111026-1.
[8] Ma D, Liu J, Huang J, et al. Sensors, 2016, 16(152): 1. |
[1] |
JIN Chun-bai1, YANG Guang1*, LU Shan2*, LIU Wen-jing1, LI De-jun1, ZHENG Nan1. Band Selection Method Based on Target Saliency Analysis in Spatial Domain[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2952-2959. |
[2] |
LI Hu1, 2, 3, LIU Xue-feng1, 3*, YAO Xu-ri4, 5*, ZHAI Guang-jie1, 3. Block Compressed Sensing Computed-Tomography Imaging Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 348-355. |
[3] |
WANG Qiang-hui, SHEN Xue-ju, ZHOU Bing*, HUA Wen-shen, YING Jia-ju, ZHAO Jia-le. Land-Based Hyperspectral Imaging and Core Drive Model for Ground
Object Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 614-622. |
[4] |
REN Yong-tian, HU Yi, CHEN Jun, CHEN Jun*. Study on Compressed Sensing Method for Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Isotope Hydrogen Gas[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 776-782. |
[5] |
ZHONG Ming-yu1, 2, 3, ZHOU Hai-jin2, SI Fu-qi2*, WANG Yu2, DOU Ke2, SU Jing-ming1, 2, 3. Reconstruction of Stack Plume Based on Imaging Differential Absorption Spectroscopy and Compressed Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1708-1712. |
[6] |
ZHAO Shou-bo1,2, LI Xiu-hong1,2. Research on Reflection Spectrum Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Compressed Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(04): 1092-1096. |
[7] |
LI Si-hai1, LIU Dong-ling2. Quantitative Analysis of Near Infrared Spectroscopy Based on Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(04): 1097-1101. |
[8] |
CAO Bing-hua1,LI Su-zhen1*,CAI En-ze1,FAN Meng-bao2,GAN Fang-xin1. Progress in Terahertz Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(09): 2686-2695. |
[9] |
ZHAO Ming-fu1, 2, TANG Ping1, 2, TANG Bin1, 2, 3*, HE Peng3, XU Yang-fei1, 2, DENG Si-xing1, 2, SHI Sheng-hui1, 2. Research on Denoising of UV-Vis Spectral Data for Water Quality Detection with Compressed Sensing Theory Based on Wavelet Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(03): 844-850. |
[10] |
WEN Jia1, 2, ZHAO Jun-suo2, WANG Cai-ling3, XIA Yu-li2 . Decomposition of Interference Hyperspectral Images Using Improved Morphological Component Analysis [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(01): 254-258. |
[11] |
LIU Jie1, PAN Jing-chang1*, LIU Meng1, WEI Peng2, LUO A-li2 . Comparison of Different Template Matching Methods of Automatic Stellar Spectrum Parameter Measurement[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(02): 558-561. |
[12] |
YANG Hui-hua1, GUO Tuo2, MA Jin-fang3, TANG Tian-biao2, LIANG Qiong-lin4, WANG Yi-ming4, LUO Guo-an4 . A Novel Online Process Monitoring Method Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Its Application to the Column Chromatographic Separation for Traditional Chinese Medicine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 32(05): 1247-1250. |
|
|
|
|