|
|
|
|
|
|
Detection of COD UV Absorption Spectra Based on PSO-PLS Hybrid Algorithm |
ZHENG Pei-chao, ZHAO Wei-neng, WANG Jin-mei*, LAI Chun-hong, WANG Xiao-fa, MAO Xue-feng |
Chongqing Municipal Level Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Information Sensing and Transmitting Technology, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400065, China |
|
|
Abstract Chemical oxygen demand (COD) is an important indicator of the degree of water pollution by organic matter. Ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy is the most widely used method for COD detection in water. It has the advantages of no pretreatment of samples, low cost, no pollution, and fast measurement speed. However, the original spectral data has high dimensions, and the spectral information contains a large number of redundant variables. Modeling the full spectral data has problems such as low accuracy and complicated calculations. Aiming at the low accuracy of UV absorption full-spectrum modeling and a large amount of collinearity in spectral data, this paper presents a method based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) and partial least squares (PLS) to select characteristic wavelengths to establish a prediction model. Improve the accuracy and applicability of the UV absorption spectrum prediction model and simplify the model. The UV spectrum data of 29 different concentrations of COD standard solutions were collected. Each standard solution was collected 5 times and averaged and smoothed to reduce the errors caused by the instrument and the environment. Taking into account the absorption of the standard solution in the spectral range of 200~310 nm, 246 wavelength points in this wavelength range were selected as modeling data, and the absorbance data at each wavelength point was used as a particle and numbered in order. PLS was used as the model Method, the correlation coefficient r and the root mean square error (RMSE) are used as evaluation indicators. The particle swarm algorithm fitness function f(x)=min (RMSE) is set. The initial population of particles is 20, the inertia weight w=0.6, and the self The learning factor c1=1.6, the group learning factor c2=1.6, the maximum number of iterations is 200, and the algorithm termination condition is to reach the maximum number of iterations. The output value of the optimal global variable of the algorithm is 168, 94, 181, 183, 175, 209, 106, 142. The correlation coefficient r and the predicted root mean square error RMSE of the PLS prediction model established by the eight wavelength points selected by the particle swarm optimization algorithm were 0.999 98 and 0.155 1, respectively. In order to verify the effectiveness of the prediction model established by PSO-PLS, three prediction models of PLS, iPLS and SVR were established for comparison. The verification results show that the correlation coefficient r and the root mean square error RMSE of the PSO-PLS model are better than those of the other three prediction models, which shows that the particle swarm algorithm can effectively extract the characteristic wavelengths used for PLS modeling and eliminate the common of sub-interval variables Linear, improving the accuracy of the prediction model. This method provides an effective way for real-time online monitoring of COD in water bodies.
|
Received: 2019-11-25
Accepted: 2020-03-20
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Jin-mei
E-mail: wangjm@cqupt.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Kolb Marit, Bahadir Mufit, Teichgraber Burkhard. Water Research, 2017, 122(19): 645.
[2] Yang L, Shin H S, Jin H. Sensors, 2014, 14(1): 1771.
[3] Pigani L, Simone G V, Foca G, et al. Talanta, 2018, 178: 178.
[4] Bleyen N, Albrecht A, De Canniere P, et al. Applied Geochemistry, 2019, 100: 131.
[5] Hu Yingtian, Wen Yizhang, Wang Xiaoping. Sensor and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016, 227: 393.
[6] Hou D, Liu S, Zhang J, et al. Journal of Spectroscopy, 2014, 2014: 1.
[7] Li Z, Guan A, Ge H, et al. Microchemical Journal, 2017, 132: 185.
[8] Brito R S, Pinheiro H M, Ferreira F, et al. Urban Water Journal, 2014, 11(4): 261.
[9] YANG Peng-cheng, DU Jun-lan, CHENG Chang-kuo(杨鹏程, 杜军兰, 程长阔). Marine Environmental Science(海洋环境科学), 2016, 35(6): 943.
[10] Li Jingwei, Tong Yifei, Guan Li, et al. Optik, 2018, 174: 591.
[11] Pan T, Ji Q, Chen J M, et al. Key Engineering Materials, 2012, 500: 820.
[12] TANG Bin, ZHAO Jing-xiao, WEI Biao, et al(汤 斌, 赵敬晓, 魏 彪, 等). China Environmental Science(中国环境科学), 2015, 35(2): 478.
[13] Chen Baisheng, Wu Huanan, Li Sam Fong Yau. Talanta, 2014, 120: 325.
[14] Mojtaba Shourian, Jamshid Mousavi S. Water Resources Management, 2017, 31: 4835. |
[1] |
ZHENG Pei-chao, YIN Yi-tong, WANG Jin-mei*, ZHOU Chun-yan, ZHANG Li, ZENG Jin-rui, LÜ Qiang. Study on the Method of Detecting Phosphate Ions in Water Based on
Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrum Combined With SPA-ELM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 82-87. |
[2] |
GAO Wei-ling, ZHANG Kai-hua*, XU Yan-fen, LIU Yu-fang*. Data Processing Method for Multi-Spectral Radiometric Thermometry Based on the Improved HPSOGA[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3659-3665. |
[3] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[4] |
WANG Jin-mei, HE Shi, ZHANG Hang-xi, YANG Chen, YIN Yi-tong, ZHANG Li, ZHENG Pei-chao*. Study on the Detection Method of Nitrate Nitrogen in Water Based on
Ultraviolet Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1037-1042. |
[5] |
GUO Yang1, GUO Jun-xian1*, SHI Yong1, LI Xue-lian1, HUANG Hua2, LIU Yan-cen1. Estimation of Leaf Moisture Content in Cantaloupe Canopy Based on
SiPLS-CARS and GA-ELM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2565-2571. |
[6] |
ZHANG Liu1, YE Nan1, MA Ling-ling2, WANG Qi2, LÜ Xue-ying1, ZHANG Jia-bao1*. Hyperspectral Band Selection Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3194-3199. |
[7] |
LI Hao-guang1, 2, YU Yun-hua1, 2, PANG Yan1, SHEN Xue-feng1, 2. Research of Parameter Optimization of Preprocessing and Feature Extraction for NIRS Qualitative Analysis Based on PSO Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2742-2747. |
[8] |
HUANG Li-ying, CHEN Quan-li*, GAO Xin-xin, DU Yang, XU Feng-shun. Study on Composition and Spectral Characteristics of Turquoise Treated by “Porcelain-Added”[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2245-2250. |
[9] |
LIAN Xiao-qin1, 2,LIU Yu1, 2,CHEN Yan-ming1, 2,HUANG Jing1, 2,GONG Yong-gang1, 2,HUO Liang-sheng1, 2. Research on Multi-Peak Spectral Line Separation Method Based on Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(05): 1452-1457. |
[10] |
HOU Yao-bin1, 2, FENG Wei-wei1, 2*, CAI Zong-qi1, WANG Huan-qing1, LIU Zeng-dong3. Nitrate Measurement in the Ocean Based on Neural Network Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 3211-3216. |
[11] |
BI Wei-hong1,2, FAN Jun-bo1,2, LI Zhe1,2, LI Yu1,2, WANG Si-yuan1,2, WANG Hao1,2, FU Guang-wei1,2, ZHANG Bao-jun1,2. In-Situ Measurement of Total Organic Carbon Concentration in Seawater Based on Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2484-2489. |
[12] |
ZHANG Nan, ZHUANG Ling-hua. Spectral Analysis and Structural Identification of Remifentanil Acid[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(07): 2059-2065. |
[13] |
TIAN Guang-jun1, XU Guang-yao1, TIAN Qing2. A Piecewise Mathematical Model for COD Measurement of Water by UV Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(06): 1741-1746. |
[14] |
YUAN Zi-ran, WEI Li-fei*, ZHANG Yang-xi, YU Ming, YAN Xin-ru. Hyperspectral Inversion and Analysis of Heavy Metal Arsenic Content in Farmland Soil Based on Optimizing CARS Combined with PSO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(02): 567-573. |
[15] |
MU Yong-huan1, QIU Bo1*, WEI Shi-ya1, SONG Tao1, ZHENG Zi-peng1, GUO Ping2*. Regression Prediction of Photometric Redshift Based on Particle Warm Optimization Neural Network Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(09): 2693-2697. |
|
|
|
|