PSO聚类算法的京津冀地区气溶胶光学厚度反演

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)11-3321-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3431 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Aerosol optical thickness (AOD) is an important characterization parameter of aerosol concentration and atmospheric turbidity. Inversion of atmospheric AOD by remote sensing is an important way in the process of atmospheric monitoring and management, and in which the selection of methods suitable for the imaging characteristics of satellite sensors and the type of aerosols in line with the study area has always been the focus and difficulty of AOD inversion. In view of the problem that the traditional dark target method can not be directly applied to the multispectral remote sensing data of Gaofen Ⅳ (GF-4) satellite, this paper studies the distribution of the red and blue band equivalent surface reflectivity in GF-4 multispectral data and the linear relationship between them, and improves the dark target method to make it suitable for GF-4 satellite multispectral remote sensing data in combination with AOD inversion principle. The effect of input parameters on AOD inversion accuracy in the 6S radiation transfer model was analyzed, and the experimental results showed that aerosol type is one of the key factors affecting the high-precision inversion of AOD. The samples of aerosol characteristics in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area was analyzed by particle swarm optimization (PSO) cluster algorithm, by analyzing the proportion and half-life changes of the clustering results of each aerosol type, the C1 and C4 aerosol types in cluster results and the continental aerosol type of 6S models are finally determined to invert the AOD in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The inversion results were compared with MODIS aerosol products and AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) ground-based site data, and the suitability and characteristics of different aerosol types are evaluated by evaluation criteria such as correlation coefficient and absolute error. The experimental results show that the C4 aerosol type, which is dominated by fine particles, is more satisfied with the characteristics of aerosols in the summer and autumn of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and has better consistency with AERONET ground-based data. It is further proved that the PSO clustering algorithm can effectively reduce the influence of aerosol type difference on AOD inversion accuracy.

Key words：Aerosol; GF-4 satellite multispectral data; Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region; PSO clustering algorithm

Received: 2019-11-18 Accepted: 2020-03-09

ZTFLH:

X87

Corresponding Authors: WANG Gui-chuan E-mail: wang.guichuan@outlook.com

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)11-3321-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2020/V40/I11/3321

[1] Kaufman Y J, Sendra C. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1988, 9(8): 1357.
[2] Kaufman Y J, Tanré D, Remer L A. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1997, 102(27): 51.
[3] Hsu N C, Si-chee T, King M D, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 42(3): 557.
[4] TANG Jia-kui, XUE Yong, YU Tong, et al(唐家奎，薛勇，虞统，等). SCIENCE IN CHINA Series D: Earth Sciences(中国科学·D辑: 地球科学)，2005，35(5)：474.
[5] ZHU Yu-xia, YU Yi-yong, ZHAO Ming-yao, et al(朱玉霞，喻义勇，赵明瑶，等). Retrieval and Analysis of Aerosal Optical Depth Using Chinese Satellites(基于国产卫星的气溶胶光学厚度反演和分析). Annual Meeting of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences(中国环境科学学会年会)，2014.
[6] SUN Lin, YU Hui-yong, FU Qiao-yan, et al(孙林，于会泳，傅俏燕，等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报)，2016，20(2)：216.
[7] Wang Zhongting, Chen Liangfu, Gong Hui, et al. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009, 13(06): 1047.
[8] Vermote E F, Tanre D. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35(3): 675.
[9] LU Yi, ZHANG Pei-pei, WANG Xue-ying, et al(陆艺，张培培，王学影，等). Acta Metrologica Sinica(计量学报)，2017，38(3)：271.
[10] Hess M, Koepke P, Schult I. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1998, 79(5): 831.
[11] Omar A H, Won J-G, Winker D M, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2005, 110(d10): D10S14.
[12] Lee K H, Kim Y J. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2010, 3(3): 1771.
[13] Taylor M, Kazadzis S, Amiridis V, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 116(2015): 112.
[14] LÜ Rui, YU Xing-na, SHEN Li, et al(吕睿，于兴娜，沈丽，等). China Environmental Science(中国环境科学)，2016，36(6)：1660.
[15] WANG Han, YANG Lei-ku, DU Wei-bing, et al(王涵，杨磊库，都伟冰，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2018，38(4)：1019.
[16] Ångsträm A. Tellus, 2010, 16(1): 64.