|
|
|
|
|
|
Detection of Prepared Steaks Freshness Using Hyperspectral Technology Combined With Wavelengths Selection Methods Combination Strategy |
SUN Zong-bao, WANG Tian-zhen, LIU Xiao-yu, ZOU Xiao-bo*, LIANG Li-ming, LI Jun-kui, NIU Zeng, GAO Yun-long |
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China |
|
|
Abstract When the freshprepared steaks exceed the shelf life, its putrid odour is easily masked by the seasoning odour, making it difficult for consumers to distinguish. Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) is an effective indicator of meat freshness. Due to the chemical method of TVB-N content determination was cumbersome and time-consuming, TVB-N content in freshlyprepared steaks were predicted by hyperspectral imaging technique in this study. Furthermore, the influence of different wavelengths selection algorithms on the prediction effect of the model was discussed. Fresh prepared steaks were taken out on day 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 respectively for hyperspectral data collection and TVB-N content determination. The spectral data were pretreated by six methods, first derivative (1st Der), second derivative (2nd Der), mean centering (MC), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), Savitzky-Golay (SG), standard normal variate transformation (SNVT), which established the Partial least squares model of TVB-N content and obtained the optimum pretreatment method by comparison. After the optimum pre-processing method, the characteristic wavelengths were selected by competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS), variables combination population analysis(VCPA),interval random frog (iRF), iRF-CARS, iRF-VCPA, the prediction effects of models were evaluated on different selection wavelengths methods. CARS and VCPA were run 50 times repeatedly to assess their stability, and higher frequency wavelengths were selected to establish the PLS model to compare with a single run. The results suggested that 1st Der was the best spectral pretreatment method among the six methods. 21 and 11 wavelengths were selected by CARS and VCPA single run respectively, and the prediction model by VCPA wavelengths selection method had better effect, with the RC and RP at 0.944 and 0.931 respectively, while RMSECV and RMSEP at 1.12 and 1.28 mg·(100 g)-1 respectively. The selected frequency for each wavelength when CARS and VCPA were run 50 times repeatedly indicated that VCPA had better stability because its binary matrix sampling method provided the same sampling opportunity for each variable. At the same time, it was found that the two methods have important common wavelengths: 694.9, 696.6, 761.8, 763.5, 811.5 and 813.3 nm, etc. The performance of the model established byhigher frequency wavelengths was poor.IRF was combined with CARS and VCPA respectively for wavelengths selection, and iRF-CARS showed good predictive performance. The prediction model by iRF-CARS was established using 24 wavelengths, with the RC and RP at 0.966 and 0.938 respectively, while RMSECV and RMSEP at 0.91 and 1.22 mg·(100 g)-1 respectively. The results suggested that the combination of wavelengths interval selection and wavelengths point selection couldrealize their complementary advantages. The research suggested that hyperspectral imaging technique combined with wavelengths selection method can predict TVB-N content in prepared steaks well,which provides a theoretical reference for hybrid variable selection strategy and rapid detection of the freshness of prepared steaks.
|
Received: 2020-02-28
Accepted: 2020-06-07
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZOU Xiao-bo
E-mail: zou_xiaobo@ujs.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Velásquez L, Cruz-Tirado J P, Siche R, et al. Meat Science, 2017, 133: 43.
[2] Zheng X C, Li Y Y, Wei W S, et al. Meat Science, 2019, 149: 55.
[3] XIE An-guo, KANG Huai-bin, WANG Fei-xiang, et al(谢安国,康怀彬,王飞翔,等). Food & Machinery(食品与机械), 2018, 34(11): 20.
[4] Yun Y H, Li H D, Deng B C, et al. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 113: 102.
[5] Guo Z M, Wang M M, Wu J Z, et al. Food Chemistry, 2019, 286: 282.
[6] Yu H D, Yun Y H, Zhang W M, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2020, 224: 117376.
[7] Jiang H, Xu W D, Ding Y H, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2020, 228: 117781.
[8] Guo Z M, Wang M M, Akwasi A A, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2020, 279: 109955.
[9] Ouyang Q, Yang Y C, Wu J Z, et al. LWT, 2020, 118: 108768.
[10] Yun Y H, Li H D, Wood L R E, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2013, 111: 31.
[11] PAN Xiao-qian, ZHAO Yan, ZHANG Shun-liang, et al(潘晓倩,赵 燕,张顺亮,等). Meat Research(肉类研究), 2016, 30(3): 15.
[12] Van Beers R, Kokawa M, Aernouts B, et al. Meat Science, 2018, 136: 50.
[13] HUANG Chang-ping, ZHU Xin-ran, ZHANG Chen-lu, et al(黄长平,朱欣然,张辰璐,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2018, 38(2): 552.
[14] Talens P, Mora L, Morsy N, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2013, 117(3): 272.
[15] Dai Q, Cheng J H, Sun D W, et al. Food Chemistry, 2016, 197: 257.
[16] YANG Bin, CAO Yin-juan, YU Qun-li, et al(杨 斌,曹银娟,余群力,等). Food Science(食品科学), 2019, 40(23): 199. |
[1] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[2] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[3] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[4] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[5] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[6] |
DONG Jian-jiang1, TIAN Ye1, ZHANG Jian-xing2, LUAN Zhen-dong2*, DU Zeng-feng2*. Research on the Classification Method of Benthic Fauna Based on
Hyperspectral Data and Random Forest Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3015-3022. |
[7] |
WEI Zi-kai, WANG Jie, ZHANG Ruo-yu, ZHANG Meng-yun*. Classification of Foreign Matter in Cotton Using Line Scan Hyperspectral Transmittance Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3230-3238. |
[8] |
SUN Bang-yong1, YU Meng-ying1, YAO Qi2*. Research on Spectral Reconstruction Method From RGB Imaging Based on Dual Attention Mechanism[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2687-2693. |
[9] |
MAO Yi-lin1, LI He1, WANG Yu1, FAN Kai1, SUN Li-tao2, WANG Hui3, SONG Da-peng3, SHEN Jia-zhi2*, DING Zhao-tang1, 2*. Quantitative Judgment of Freezing Injury of Tea Leaves Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2266-2271. |
[10] |
LIU Gang1, LÜ Jia-ming1, NIU Wen-xing1, LI Qi-feng2, ZHANG Ying-hu2, YANG Yun-peng2, MA Xiang-yun2*. Detection of Sulfur Content in Vessel Fuel Based on Hyperspectral
Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1697-1702. |
[11] |
LI Bin, HAN Zhao-yang, WANG Qiu, SUN Zhao-xiang, LIU Yan-de*. Research on Bruise Level Detection of Loquat Based on Hyperspectral
Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1792-1799. |
[12] |
HU Hui-qiang1, WEI Yun-peng1, XU Hua-xing1, ZHANG Lei2, MAO Xiao-bo1*, ZHAO Yun-ping2*. Identification of the Age of Puerariae Thomsonii Radix Based on Hyperspectral Imaging and Principal Component Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1953-1960. |
[13] |
ZHANG Fan1, WANG Wen-xiu1, ZHANG Yu-fan1, HU Ze-xuan1, ZHAO Dan-yang1, MA Qian-yun1, SHI Hai-yan2, SUN Jian-feng1*. Hyperspectral and Ensemble Learning Method for Rapid Identification of Black Spot in Yali Pear at Gley Stage[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(05): 1541-1549. |
[14] |
GUO Feng1, ZHAO Dong-e1*, YANG Xue-feng1, CHU Wen-bo2, ZHANG Bin1, ZHANG Da-shun3MENG Fan-jun3. Research on Hyperspectral Image Recognition of Iron Fragments[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 997-1003. |
[15] |
JIA Meng-meng, YIN Yong*, YU Hui-chun, YUAN Yun-xia, WANG Zhi-hao. Hyperspectral Imaging Combined With Feature Wavelength Screening for Monitoring the Quality Change of Tomato During Storage[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 969-975. |
|
|
|
|