|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment of Influence Sampling Position Variability on Precision of Near Infrared Models for Huanglongbing of Navel Orange |
ZOU Jun-cheng1,2, LU Zhan-jun1,3*, QIAO Ning2, RAO Min2,KUANG Min2, ZHONG Yan-wen2, HUANG Xue-yuan2 |
1. College of Life Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China
2. Ganzhou Customs, Ganzhou 341000, China
3. National Navel Orange Engineering Research Center, Ganzhou 341000, China |
|
|
Abstract The near-infrared models have been applied in huanglongbing detection and it has been proved to be feasible, but the present studies are limited to taking leaves as samples. The phloem of bark is a channel to transport pathogens and nutriment, it has been shown to play an important role in pathological initiation, progression and maintenance, so that we can detect huanglongbing in the early stages with the specific information of barks. In order to explore the feasibility of infrared spectroscopy based on the bark samples and analyze the influence of sampling position variability on near infrared models for huanglongbing, three kinds of sampling plan were designed in this paper: navel orange leaves, navel orange barks and composite samples (navel orange leaves and navel orange barks). Then, we established the prediction model of HLB (huanglongbing) with PLSR (partial least square regression) and PCR (principal component regression), when the normalization was turned out to be the optimal data preprocessing method. We found that the RMSEP (root mean squared error of prediction) are all at the level of 10-5: RMSEPL (RMSEP of leaves, 1.690 9×10-5) < RMSEPB (RMSEP of barks, 1.889 0×10-5) < RMSEPC (RMSEP of composite samples, 1.690 9×10-5);and the r2 (determination coefficient of prediction) are all greater than 0.9: r2L (r2 of leaves, 0.939 6) <r2B (r2 of barks, 0.941 5) <r2C (r2 of composite samples, 0.960 3). It means that all of the models have good accuracy and prediction ability. The model based on the leaves is the most accurate but the least predictive, and the model based on the composite samples is the least accurate but the most predictive. Only based on the barks can the accuracy and predictive ability of the model maintained at the mid-range level. In this study, the original spectra and model effects of leaves and barks were compared and analyzed, the feasibility of rapid infrared spectroscopy based on the bark samples was discussed, it provides a new idea for the application of near infrared in the diagnosis of huanglongbing.
|
Received: 2018-11-19
Accepted: 2019-07-18
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LU Zhan-jun
E-mail: luzhanjun7@139.com
|
|
[1] Luo L, Gao S, Ge Y, et al. Advances in Difference Equations, 2017, 2017(1): 355.
[2] WANG Xiao-liang, LI Xiao-nan, FENG Xiao-dong, et al(王晓亮,李潇楠,冯晓东,等). Plant Quarantine(植物检疫),2016,30:44.
[3] LIU Yan-de, XIAO Huai-chun, SUN Xu-dong, et al(刘燕德, 肖怀春, 孙旭东,等). Transcation of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2018, 34(3): 180.
[4] LIU Yan-de, XIAO Huai-chun, SUN Xu-dong, et al(刘燕德,肖怀春,孙旭东,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2018,38(2):528.
[5] RAO Min, GUI Jia-xiang, LU Zhan-jun, et al(饶 敏, 桂家祥, 卢占军,等). Plant Protection(植物保护),2017,43:135.
[6] JIA Zhi-cheng, Reza E, ZHENG Jia-qiang, et al(贾志成, Reza E, 郑加强,等). Transcation of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报),2017,33:219.
[7] Zou X, Jiang X, Xu L, et al. Plant Molecular Biology, 2017, 93(4-5): 1.
[8] CHEN Chuan-wu, FU Hui-min, DENG Chong-ling, et al(陈传武,付慧敏,邓崇岭,等). Journal of Southern Agriculture(南方农业学报), 2015, 46(6): 1024.
[9] ZHAO Yuan-yuan, MING Jia-jia, HU Cheng-xiao, et al(赵园园,明佳佳,胡承孝,等). Hubei Agricultural Science(湖北农业科学),2015,9: 2049.
[10] Johnson E G, Wu J, Bright D B, et al. Plant Pathology, 2014, 63(2): 290.
[11] Ding F, Duan Y, Paul C, et al. Plos One, 2015, 10(5): e0123939.
[12] CHU Li-ping, ZHENG Zheng, DENG Xiao-ling(褚丽萍,郑 正,邓晓玲). South China Fruits(中国南方果树),2016,45:42. |
[1] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[2] |
MU Da1, 2, WANG Qi-shu1, 2*, CUI Zong-yu1, 2, REN Jiao-jiao1, 2, ZHANG Dan-dan1, 2, LI Li-juan1, 2, XIN Yin-jie1, 2, ZHOU Tong-yu3. Study on Interference Phenomenon in Terahertz Time Domain
Spectroscopy Nondestructive Testing of Glass Fiber Composites[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3031-3040. |
[3] |
CAI Jian-rong1, 2, HUANG Chu-jun1, MA Li-xin1, ZHAI Li-xiang1, GUO Zhi-ming1, 3*. Hand-Held Visible/Near Infrared Nondestructive Detection System for Soluble Solid Content in Mandarin by 1D-CNN Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2792-2798. |
[4] |
TANG Ruo-han1, 2, LI Xiu-hua1, 2*, LÜ Xue-gang1, 2, ZHANG Mu-qing2, 3, YAO Wei2, 3. Transmittance Vis-NIR Spectroscopy for Detecting Fibre Content of
Living Sugarcane[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2419-2425. |
[5] |
LUO Zheng-fei1, GONG Zheng-li1, 2, YANG Jian1, 2*, YANG Chong-shan2, 3, DONG Chun-wang3*. Rapid Non-Destructive Detection Method for Black Tea With Exogenous Sucrose Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2649-2656. |
[6] |
ZHANG Yue1, 2, LI Yang1, 2, SONG Yue-peng1, 2*. Nondestructive Detection of Slight Mechanical Damage of Apple by Hyperspectral Spectroscopy Based on Stacking Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2272-2277. |
[7] |
SHENG Qiang1, 2, ZHENG Jian-ming1*, LIU Jiang-shan2, SHI Wei-chao1, LI Hai-tao2. Advances and Prospects in Inner Surface Defect Detection Based on Cite Space[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 9-15. |
[8] |
ZHU Jin-yan, ZHU Yu-jie*, FENG Guo-hong*, ZENG Ming-fei, LIU Si-qi. Optimization of Near-Infrared Detection Model of Blueberry Sugar Content Based on Deep Belief Network and Hybrid Wavelength Selection Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3775-3782. |
[9] |
WANG Wei, LI Yong-yu*, PENG Yan-kun, YANG Yan-ming, YAN Shuai, MA Shao-jin. Design and Experiment of a Handheld Multi-Channel Discrete Spectrum Detection Device for Potato Processing Quality[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3889-3895. |
[10] |
LI Ming1*, HAN Dong-hai2*, LU Ding-qiang1, LU Xiao-xiang1, CHAI Chun-xiang1, LIU Wen3, SUN Ke-xuan1. Research Progress of Universal Model of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Agricultural Products and Foods Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3355-3360. |
[11] |
JIN Cheng-qian1, 2, GUO Zhen1, ZHANG Jing1, MA Cheng-ye1, TANG Xiao-han1, ZHAO Nan1, YIN Xiang1. Non-Destructive Detection and Visualization of Soybean Moisture Content Using Hyperspectral Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3052-3057. |
[12] |
ZHANG Xu1, YAN Yue-er1*, ZHANG Chun-mei2*, YANG Guang-hui1, TANG Yi3. Non-Destructive Analysis of Yan’an Red Literature by FTIR Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3097-3102. |
[13] |
ZHOU Tong-tong1, SUN Xiao-lin1, SUN Zhi-zhong2, PENG He-huan1, SUN Tong1, HU Dong1*. Current Status and Future Perspective of Spectroscopy and Imaging
Technique Applications in Bruise Detection of Fruits and Vegetables:
A Review[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2657-2665. |
[14] |
LI Rui1, LI Bo1*, WANG Xue-wen1, LIU Tao1, LI Lian-jie1,2, FAN Shu-xiang2. A Classification Method of Coal and Gangue Based on XGBoost and
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2947-2955. |
[15] |
LIAN Xiao-qin1, 2, CHEN Qun1, 2, TANG Shen-miao1, 2, WU Jing-zhu1, 2, WU Ye-lan1, 2, GAO Chao1, 2. Quantitative Analysis Method of Key Nutrients in Lanzhou Lily Based on NIR and SOM-RBF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2025-2032. |
|
|
|
|