基于高光谱的草坪草叶绿素含量模拟估算

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)08-2571-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4371 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Lawn color is the most obvious indicator of ornamental lawn value. It is of great significance to explore the relationship between chlorophyll content of turfgrass and the hyperspectral reflectance. This relationship can be used to develop models to calculate the chlorophyll content for lawn quality evaluation purpose. In this study, three common lawn grass species—Festuca arundinacea CV. Hongxiang, Lolium perenne CV. Bailingniao and Poa pratensis CV. Kentucky was cultivated in pots. Measurements of chlorophyll content and hyperspectral reflectance were made during active growth period by tys-a3500 chlorophyll meter and SOC710VP imaging spectrometer to determine the relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) and spectral data of turf grass canopy, respectively. Person correlation analysis for each of the SPAD, 1/SPAD and log(1/SPAD) was conducted with a group of variables including vegetation index—10 G (green vegetation index), ARVI (atmospheric impedance difference vegetation index), VARI (visual pressure impedance index), NDVI705 normalized difference vegetation index (705), MSR705 red edge ratio vegetation index (improved), NDVI670 normalized difference vegetation index (670), CI (chlorophyll index), PSRI attenuation (vegetation index), RGI (relatively green index) and EVI ( Enhance the correlation of vegetation index). After screening the hyperspectral bands of vegetation index with the highest correlation with chlorophyll content, models were developed using the vegetation index based on these bands. After the best model was selecting through an accuracy test, the model was used to estimate the chlorophyll SPAD values change for turf grasses under different concentrations of heavy metals Pb²⁺ stress. The results are summarized as follows: (1) the overall trends of spectral curves of different turfgrass were not significantly different, but the reflectance (REF) of different species were different. At the band of 730~1 000 nm, there was no significant difference between “lark” perennial ryegrass and “red elephant” tallfestia REF, but the spectral characteristics of “Kentucky bluegrass” were unique with a higher REF. (2) among the 10 vegetation indexes, VARI, RGI and PSRI were extremely significantly correlated with 3 chlorophyll indexes of turfgrass, and the absolute value of correlation coefficient R² was all greater than 0.65, indicating that it is feasible to estimate the chlorophyll content of turfgrass with these 3 vegetation indexes. (3) Stepwise regression analysis of vegetation index and chlorophyll index shows that in the single-factor regression model, the model determination coefficient (R²) of estimating 1/SPAD using vegetation index VARI, RGI and PSRI was above 0.626, which was generally higher than the estimation of SPAD and log(1/SPAD). In multiple linear regression, the model determination coefficient (R²) constructed by 10 vegetation indexes and chlorophyll index 1/SPAD was also the highest (0.817), showing that SPAD reciprocal form is applicable to be used the in model estimation of chlorophyll in turfgrass. (4) The best model selected from the models with a high determination coefficient (>0.7) through accuracy test was y_1/SPAD=0.161x_RGI+0.007x_GI-0.054 (R²=0.817, RMSE=0.023).

Key words：Hyperspectral; Turfgrass; Chlorophyll; Vegetation indices

Received: 2019-07-19 Accepted: 2019-11-22

ZTFLH:

P237

Corresponding Authors: LIU Xiao-ni E-mail: liuxn@gsau.edu.cn

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)08-2571-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2020/V40/I08/2571

[1] WEI Xiu-hong, JIN Gui-li, FAN Yan-min, et al(魏秀红，靳瑰丽，范燕敏，等). Pratacultural Science(草业科学)，2016，33(10)：1924.
[2] ZHANG Wei, WANG Xin-mei, PAN Qing-mei, et al(张玮, 王鑫梅, 潘庆梅, 等). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2018, 38(18): 322.
[3] WANG Yong-min, LI Xi-can, TIAN Lin-ya, et al(王永敏, 李西灿, 田林亚, 等). Remote Sensing for Land and Resources(国土资源遥感), 2019, 31(1): 110.
[4] FAN Yun-bao, ZHAO Wen-ji, GONG Zhao-ning, et al(范云豹, 赵文吉, 宫兆宁, 等). Wetland Science(湿地科学), 2016, 14(5): 654.
[5] HAN Hao-kun, MIAO Jia-yuan, ZHANG Jue-yu, et al(韩浩坤, 妙佳源, 张钰玉, 等). Agricultural Research In Arid Regions(干旱地区农业研究), 2018, 36(1): 164.
[6] DOU Zhi-guo, CUI Li-juan, WU Gao-jie, et al(窦志国, 崔丽娟, 武高洁, 等). Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2018, 37(10): 298.
[7] ZHOU Min-gu, SHAO Guo-min, ZHANG Li-yuan, et al(周敏姑, 邵国敏, 张立元，等). Water Saving Irrigation(节水灌溉), 2019，44(9): 40.
[8] ZHENG Yi-li, ZHAO Yan-dong, DONG Wei, et al(郑一力, 赵燕东, 董玮, 等). Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报）, 2018, 49(S1): 393.
[9] YAO Yun-jun, QIN Qi-ming, ZHANG Zi-li, et al(姚云军, 秦其明, 张自力, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2008, 24(7)：301.
[10] GAO Jin-long, LIU Jie, YIN Jian-peng, et al(高金龙，刘洁，殷建鹏，等). Acta Prataculturae Sinica(草业学报)，2020，29(2)：172.
[11] SUN Yan, ZHOU He, YANG Qing-chuan(孙彦, 周禾, 杨青川). Lawn Practical Technical Manual(草坪实用技术手册). Beijing: Chemical Industry Press(北京: 化学工业出版社), 2001.
[12] LI Zhe, ZHANG Fei, CHEN Li-hua, et al(李哲, 张飞, 陈丽华, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2018, 38(5): 211.
[13] YASENJIANG Kahaer, NIJAT Kasim, NIGARA Tashpola, et al(亚森江·喀哈尔, 尼加提·卡斯木, 尼格拉·塔什甫拉提, 等). Journal of Wheat Crops(麦类作物学报), 2019, 39(2): 225.
[14] YU Jiao-yang, CHANG Qing-rui, YOU Ming-ming, et al(余蛟洋, 常庆瑞, 由明明, 等). Journal of Northwest Forestry University(西北林学院学报), 2018, 33(2): 156.
[15] TANG Peng, LIU Guang, XU Jun-feng(唐鹏, 刘光, 徐俊锋). Journal of Hangzhou Normal University·Natural Science Edition(杭州师范大学学报·自然科学版), 2014, 13(6): 634.