|
|
|
|
|
|
The Determination of Potassium Sorbate Concentration Based on ICSO-SVM Combining Three-Dimensional Fluorescence Spectra |
WANG Shu-tao, LIU Shi-yu*, WANG Zhi-fang, ZHANG Jing-kun, KONG De-ming, WANG Yu-tian |
Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Test/Measurement Technology and Instruments, School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China |
|
|
Abstract Potassium sorbate is a typical food preservative in daily life. Excessive consumption of the preservative potassium sorbate shall do harm to people’s health seriously. Using orange juice as background solution, 22 sets of samples of potassium sorbate orange juice solution with potassium sorbate content ranging from 0.007 0~0.100 0 g·L-1 were prepared. In this paper, the fluorescence characteristics of potassium sorbate in aqueous solution and in orange juice solution are studied by using FS920 fluorescence spectrometer. Due to the interference of orange juice, the concentration of potassium sorbate no longer satisfies the linear relationship with fluorescence intensity, and the prediction of the concentration of the substance is complicated. In this paper, an improved chicken swarm optimization support vector machine (ICSO-SVM) model is constructed to process the fluorescence spectrum data. Eighteen samples are selected as training set and four samples as prediction set. Under the optimum excitation wavelength λex=375 nm, the fluorescence intensity of each samples in the range of 450~520 nm are taken as input, and the concentrations of potassium sorbate orange juice are taken as output. Firstly, the parameters of the improved chicken swarm algorithm (ICSO) are initialized, then the optimal values of penalty factor C and kernel parameter g of the support vector machine (SVM) are found by training, and the optimal values are input into the ICSO-SVM model. The predicted concentration values of four groups are 0.011 5,0.026 0,0.077 0 and 0.092 0 g·L-1, respectively. The mean square error of ICSO-SVM model is 1.01×10-5 g·L-1, and the average recovery is 101.73%. Compared with chicken swarm optimization support vector machine (CSO-SVM), genetic algorithm optimization support vector machine (GA-SVM) and particle swarm optimization support vector machine (PSO-SVM) under the same conditions. The results show that the prediction accuracy of ICSO-SVM model is higher than that of CSO-SVM, GA-SVM and PSO-SVM. Moreover, the improved chicken swarm algorithm is easier to find the global optimal value in the training process and has faster iteration speed. This paper provides a new method for predicting the concentration of substances.
|
Received: 2019-03-27
Accepted: 2019-07-22
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIU Shi-yu
E-mail: 2576954766@qq.com
|
|
[1] XIAN Zhi-feng(冼志锋). Enterprise Science and Technology and Development(企业科技与发展), 2014, 14(18): 21.
[2] Cao Yu, Li Jia-yu, Liu Jun, et al. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2018, 135(48): 46885.
[3] Xie Shengming, Yuan Liming. Journal of Separation Science, 2017, 40(1): 124.
[4] JI Jie, LI Xiu-qin, MAO Ting, et al(纪 洁, 李秀琴, 毛 婷, 等). Acta Metrologica Sinica(计量学报), 2017, 38(4): 507.
[5] Tighrine Abderrahmane, Amir Youcef, Alfaro Pilar, et al. Food Chemistry, 2019, 277: 586.
[6] WANG Shu-tao, CHEN Dong-ying, WEI Meng, et al(王书涛, 陈东营, 魏 蒙, 等). Chinese Journal of Laser(中国激光), 2015, 42(5): 0515004.
[7] SHEN Hai-dong, BAI Yu-hong, ZHENG Hua, et al(沈海东, 白玉洪, 郑 华, 等). Offshore Oil(海洋石油), 2017, 37(2): 61.
[8] MA Yan, ZHAO Han-dong, HUANG Xin(马 焱, 赵捍东, 黄 鑫). Journal of Detection and Control(探测与控制学报), 2017, 39(2): 124.
[9] YANG Jing, LI Jun-fu, ZHANG Gao-qing(杨 旌, 李俊付, 张高青). Journal of Guangxi University·Natural Science Edition(广西大学学报·自然科学版), 2017, 42(4): 1623.
[10] ZHANG Ying-jie, ZHANG Shu-qun(张莹杰, 张树群). Computer Engineering and Science(计算机工程与科学), 2018, 40(12): 2252.
[11] WANG Dong-feng, MENG Li(王东风, 孟 丽). Acta Automatica Sinica(自动化学报), 2016, 42(10): 1552.
[12] Baqheri Majid, Rezaei Hadi. Carbonates and Evaporites, 2019, 34:699.
[13] Torabi Shadi, Safi-Esfahani Faramarz. Soft Computing, 2019,23(20): 10129.
[14] KONG Fei, WU Ding-hui(孔 飞, 吴定会). Journal of Jiangnan University·Natural Science Edition(江南大学学报·自然科学版), 2015, 14(6): 681.
[15] LI Zhen-bi, WANG Kang, JIANG Yuan-yuan(李振璧, 王 康, 姜媛媛). Microellectronics and Computer(微电子学与计算机), 2017, 34(2): 30.
[16] XU Yi-xun, LI Wang, LI Dong-dong, et al(许仪勋, 李 旺, 李东东, 等). Power System Protection and Control(电力系统保护与控制), 2016, 44(13): 27.
[17] MA Wang-qiong, CHEN Hua-cai, CHEN Xiao-zhen, et al(麻望琼, 陈华才, 陈小珍). Journal of China University of Metrology(中国计量学院学报), 2015, (2): 182. |
[1] |
LEI Hong-jun1, YANG Guang1, PAN Hong-wei1*, WANG Yi-fei1, YI Jun2, WANG Ke-ke2, WANG Guo-hao2, TONG Wen-bin1, SHI Li-li1. Influence of Hydrochemical Ions on Three-Dimensional Fluorescence
Spectrum of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Water Environment
and the Proposed Classification Pretreatment Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 134-140. |
[2] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[3] |
GU Yi-lu1, 2,PEI Jing-cheng1, 2*,ZHANG Yu-hui1, 2,YIN Xi-yan1, 2,YU Min-da1, 2, LAI Xiao-jing1, 2. Gemological and Spectral Characterization of Yellowish Green Apatite From Mexico[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 181-187. |
[4] |
HAN Xue1, 2, LIU Hai1, 2, LIU Jia-wei3, WU Ming-kai1, 2*. Rapid Identification of Inorganic Elements in Understory Soils in
Different Regions of Guizhou Province by X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 225-229. |
[5] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[6] |
WANG Hong-jian1, YU Hai-ye1, GAO Shan-yun1, LI Jin-quan1, LIU Guo-hong1, YU Yue1, LI Xiao-kai1, ZHANG Lei1, ZHANG Xin1, LU Ri-feng2, SUI Yuan-yuan1*. A Model for Predicting Early Spot Disease of Maize Based on Fluorescence Spectral Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3710-3718. |
[7] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[8] |
SONG Yi-ming1, 2, SHEN Jian1, 2, LIU Chuan-yang1, 2, XIONG Qiu-ran1, 2, CHENG Cheng1, 2, CHAI Yi-di2, WANG Shi-feng2,WU Jing1, 2*. Fluorescence Quantum Yield and Fluorescence Lifetime of Indole, 3-Methylindole and L-Tryptophan[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3758-3762. |
[9] |
YANG Ke-li1, 2, PENG Jiao-yu1, 2, DONG Ya-ping1, 2*, LIU Xin1, 2, LI Wu1, 3, LIU Hai-ning1, 3. Spectroscopic Characterization of Dissolved Organic Matter Isolated From Solar Pond[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3775-3780. |
[10] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[11] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[12] |
LI Xiao-li1, WANG Yi-min2*, DENG Sai-wen2, WANG Yi-ya2, LI Song2, BAI Jin-feng1. Application of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry in Geological and
Mineral Analysis for 60 Years[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2989-2998. |
[13] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
[14] |
XUE Fang-jia, YU Jie*, YIN Hang, XIA Qi-yu, SHI Jie-gen, HOU Di-bo, HUANG Ping-jie, ZHANG Guang-xin. A Time Series Double Threshold Method for Pollution Events Detection in Drinking Water Using Three-Dimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3081-3088. |
[15] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
|
|
|
|