|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on the Shrimp Quality of Different Storage Conditions Based on Raman Spectroscopy and Prediction Model |
SUI Ya-nan1,2, ZHANG Lei-lei1,2, LU Shi-yang1,2, YANG De-hong1,2, ZHU Cheng1,2* |
1. College of Life Sciences, China Jiliang University,Hangzhou 310018, China
2. Key Laboratory of Marine Food Quality and Hazard Controlling Technology of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou 310018, China |
|
|
Abstract About the prawn’s freshness characteristics of quality deterioration, the research takes color (L*, a*, b*), volatile base nitrogen(TVB-N), ph, and other quality indexes as the object of the study, and uses Raman nondestructive testing technology to select the spectral information of fresh prawn on the temperature of 4 ℃ and under -20 ℃, also makes the quick quantitative test by combining with ridge regression, partial least squares method and forward stepwise regression, establishes the quantitative mode of the quality index. And the spectral data preprocessing includes SG smoothing, background deduction, second order differential and standard normal variable transform, combines 4 types of preprocessing in a certain way and deals with the data by PCA dimension reduction technology, in order to select the best mode. The result shows that, when using ridge regression to establish the quantitative mode of color (a*, b*), under the combined pretreatment mode, the modeling centralization R are 0.983 and 0.973 respectively, RMSE are 0.114 and 0.179 respectively; the forecast concentration R are 0.513 and 0.564 respectively, RMSE are 0.615 and 0.918 respectively, the accuracy of the modeling set is much higher than that of the prediction set, which indicates that there exists over-fitting, and the over-fitting decreases after dimension reduction by PCA, but the prediction effect of prediction sets is not satisfactory; partial least squares method and the ridge regression are about the same on the accuracy of indicator modeling sets, the accuracy of partial least squares method is lower on the prediction sets. After PCA dimension reduction, the related coefficient of partial index modeling sets decrease, the root mean square error increases, and the prediction accuracy decreases. The final result shows that, after 4 types of preprocessing, the mode of forward stepwise regression is the best, the modeling centralization L*, a*, b*, pH, TVB-N index R are 0.904, 0.885, 0.864, 0.934, 0.940 respectively, RMSE are 1.141, 0.280, 0.535, 0.131, 2.345 respectively; the forecast concentration R are 0.863, 0.850, 0.859, 0.900, 0.916 respectively, RMSE are 1.394, 0.406, 0.605, 0.194, 2.734 respectively, the modeling effect is good. Therefore, it is practicable to use the Raman spectroscopy technology, combining with forwarding stepwise regression to quick test the prawn’s L*, a*, b*, pH and volatile base nitrogen content, which provide meaningful guidance for the application of Raman technology in prawn quality detection.
|
Received: 2019-04-28
Accepted: 2019-08-16
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHU Cheng
E-mail: pzhch@cjlu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Chu Bingquan,Lin Lei,He Yong. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2017,10(4): 252.
[2] Neto A I,Meredith H J,Jenkins C L,Wilker J J,et al. RSC Advances,2013,3(24): 9352.
[3] Killeen Daniel P,Marshall Susan N,Burgess Elaine,et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2017,65(17): 3551.
[4] Husan Murat Velioğlu,Havva Tümay Temiz,Ismail Hakki Boyaci. Food Chemistry,2015, 172: 283.
[5] Zhang Dongjie,You Hongjun,Yuan Lei,et al. Analytical Chemistry,2019,91(7): 4697.
[6] Hassoun Abdo,Sahar Amna,Lakhal Lyes,et al. LWT-Food Science and Technology,2019,103: 279.
[7] Hikima Jun-ichi,Ando Masahiro,Hamaguchi Hiro-o,Marine Biotechnology,2017,19: 157.
[8] Zhang Yuanyuan,Yu Wansong,Pei Lu,Food Chemistry,2015,169: 80.
[9] Cheng Junhu,Sun Dawen,Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,2015,14(4): 478.
[10] WANG Xue,SUN Mei-juan,LIU Jun-xian,et al(王 雪,孙美娟,刘军贤,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2012,32(9): 2433.
[11] YUAN Li,JI Xiu,SHI Tong,et al(袁 丽,纪 秀,石 彤,等). Food Science(食品科学),2016,37(18): 202.
[12] GAO Wen-hong,YE Rui-sen,PAN Ting-tiao,et al(高文宏,叶瑞森,潘廷跳,等). Food Science(食品科学),2018,39(24): 71.
[13] DOU Ying,SUN Xiao-rong,LIU Cui-ling(窦 颖,孙晓荣,刘翠玲). Food Science(食品科学),2014,35(22): 185. |
[1] |
HAO Zi-yuan1, YANG Wei1*, LI Hao1, YU Hao1, LI Min-zan1, 2. Study on Prediction Models for Leaf Area Index of Multiple Crops Based on Multi-Source Information and Deep Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3862-3870. |
[2] |
LI Xin-xing1, 2, ZHANG Ying-gang1, MA Dian-kun1, TIAN Jian-jun3, ZHANG Bao-jun3, CHEN Jing4*. Review on the Application of Spectroscopy Technology in Food Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2333-2338. |
[3] |
FENG Ying-chao1, HUANG Yi-ming2*, LIU Jin-ping1, JIA Chen-peng2, CHEN Peng1, WU Shao-jie2*, REN Xu-kai3, YU Huan-wei3. On-Line Monitoring of Laser Wire Filling Welding Process Based on Emission Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1927-1935. |
[4] |
SI Gan-shang1, 2, LIU Jia-xiang1, LI Zhen-gang1, 2, NING Zhi-qiang1, 2, FANG Yong-hua1, 2*, CHENG Zhen1, 2, SI Bei-bei1, 2, YANG Chang-ping1, 2. Raman Signal Enhancement for Liquid Detection Using a New Sample Cell[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 712-717. |
[5] |
HAI Jing-pu1, 2, GUO Ling-hua1, 2*, QI Yu-ying1, 2, LIU Guo-dong1, 2. Research on the Spectral Prediction Model of Gravure Spot Color Scale Based on Density[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 31-36. |
[6] |
LIU Feng-xiang, HE Shuai, ZHANG Li-hao, HUANG Xia, SONG Yi-zhi*. Application of Raman Spectroscopy in Detection of Pathogenic Microorganisms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3653-3658. |
[7] |
LI Jun-meng1, ZHAI Xue-dong1, YANG Zi-han1, ZHAO Yan-ru1, 2, 3, YU Ke-qiang1, 2, 3*. Microscopic Raman Spectroscopy for Diagnosing Roots in Apple
Rootstock Under Heavy Metal Copper Stress[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2890-2895. |
[8] |
ZHANG Yuan-zhe1, LIU Yu-hao1, LU Yu-jie1, MA Chao-qun1, 2*, CHEN Guo-qing1, 2, WU Hui1, 2. Study on the Spectral Prediction of Phosphor-Coated White LED Based on Partial Least Squares Regression[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2347-2352. |
[9] |
GUO Jing-jing1, YU Hai-ye1, LIU Shuang2, XIAO Fei1, ZHAO Xiao-man1, YANG Ya-ping1, TIAN Shao-nan1, ZHANG Lei1*. Study on the Hyperspectral Discrimination Method of Lettuce Leaf
Greenness[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2557-2564. |
[10] |
SHI Wen-qiang1, XU Xiu-ying1*, ZHANG Wei1, ZHANG Ping2, SUN Hai-tian1, 3, HU Jun1. Prediction Model of Soil Moisture Content in Northern Cold Region Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1704-1710. |
[11] |
NIU Teng1, 3, LU Jie1, 2*, YU Jia-xin4, WU Ying-da5, LONG Qian-qian3, YU Qiang3. Research on Inversion of Water Conservation Distribution of Forest Ecosystem in Alpine Mountain Based on Spectral Features[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 530-536. |
[12] |
MA Jin-ge1, YANG Qiao-ling2, DENG Xiao-jun1*, SHI Yi-yin1, GU Shu-qing1, ZHAO Chao-min1, YU Yong-ai3, ZHANG Feng4. On-Site Rapid and Non-Destructive Identification Method for Imported Bulk Olive Oil Quality Based on Portable Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2789-2794. |
[13] |
LIU Tan1, 2, XU Tong-yu1, 2*, YU Feng-hua1, 2, YUAN Qing-yun1, 2, GUO Zhong-hui1, XU Bo1. Chlorophyll Content Estimation of Northeast Japonica Rice Based on Improved Feature Band Selection and Hybrid Integrated Modeling[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2556-2564. |
[14] |
HAN Qian-qian, YANG Ke-ming*, LI Yan-ru, GAO Wei, ZHANG Jian-hong. SVD-ANFIS Model for Predicting the Content of Heavy Metal Lead in Corn Leaves Using Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1930-1935. |
[15] |
LI Xin-xing1, GUO Wei1, BAI Xue-bing1, YANG Ming-song2*. Review on the Application of Spectroscopy Technology in Aquatic Product Quality Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(05): 1343-1349. |
|
|
|
|