H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>氧化-荧光分析法测定乌骨鸡黑色素细胞中黑色素含量

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)05-1595-06

Abstract
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (1619 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract We established a simple, accurate and highly sensitive fluorescence analysis method for detecting the melanin content of Black-bone Silky Fowl (BSF) melanocytes for the first time. Melanins did not fluoresce but, once they were subjected to oxidative conditions (heating in alkaline hydrogen peroxide solution), they acquired strong fluorescence. Melanin content of melanocytes was determined by measuring its relative fluorescence intensity. In this paper, the excitation wavelength and emission wavelength of BSF melanin were determined by fluorescence spectrophotometer with a bandwidth of 5 nm, scanning speed of 2 400 nm·min^-1 and scanning pitch of 1 nm. The optimal oxidation conditions of BSF melanin in the range of 10～100 μg·mL^-1 were screened by a single factor experiment. The linear range, detection limit, instrument precision and repeatability of the method were analyzed and evaluated. 25, 40 and 80 μg·mL^-1 melanin standards were added to samples of A375 cells (melanoma cells without melanin), and the melanin content in the cell samples was determined after that the reaction was carried out under optimal oxidation conditions. Calculate the relative error value of the measured value and the theoretical value for exploring the effect of heterologous proteins and lipids in cells on the quantitative results of melanin; After that 5.00, 7.50 and 10.00 μg melanin standards were added to BSF melanocyte samples, the total melanin content in the cell samples was determined under optimal oxidation conditions and then the spiked recovery was calculated. The results showed that the BSF melanin had an excitation wavelength of 354 nm and an emission wavelength of 453 nm; The optimal oxidation conditions for BSF melanin were as follows: the PH value was 8, oxidation temperature was 55 ℃, hydrogen peroxide concentration ranged from 24% to 26% and oxidation time was 2 h; The concentration of melanin in the range of 10～100 μg·mL^-1 showed a good linear relationship with the relative fluorescence intensity. The correlation coefficient was 0.997 4 and the linear regression equation was y=0.014 7x+0.313 8. The detection limit of the method of fluorescence analysis was 0.30 μg·mL^-1 and the detection limit of ultraviolet spectrophotometry was 3.68 μg·mL^-1. The RSD value of the precision experiment was 1.87%, and the RSD value of the repeat experiment was 4.59%. After adding melanin standards of different quality to A375 cells, the relative errors of measured values and theoretical values were 2.78%, 3.53%, and 0.25%, respectively; After adding different melanin standards to BSF melanocytes, the measured recovery rates were 95.94%, 92.14%, 99.83% and the RSD value was 4.00%. In summary, the method was simple, accurate, stable, and low detection limit. In addition, the measurement result was not interfered by intracellular heteroprotein and lipid. So the method was more suitable for determining the content of melanin in BSF melanocytes.

Key words：Black-bone silky fowl; Melanocyte; Melanin content; Fluorescence analysis

Received: 2019-04-06 Accepted: 2019-08-19

ZTFLH:

O657.39

Corresponding Authors: TIAN Ying-gang E-mail: yinggangtian@163.com

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)05-1595-06 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2020/V40/I05/1595

[1] TIAN Ying-gang, HU Qing-qing, XIE Ming-yong(田颖刚, 胡清清, 谢明勇). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2018, 38(11): 3563.
[2] LIU Qing, JIANG Yan, HE Zi-ying, et al(刘青, 江彦, 何资颖, 等). Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine(黑龙江畜牧兽医), 2018，(11): 93.
[3] TIAN Ying-gang, LIAO Chun-yan, XU De-li(田颖刚, 廖春艳, 徐德利). China Poultry(中国家禽), 2014, 36(12): 6.
[4] Chen S R, Jiang B, Zheng J X, et al. Food Chemistry, 2008, 111(3): 745.
[5] ZHANG Kun, BIAN Liang-yong, XU Sheng-hai, et al(张琨, 卞良勇, 许盛海). China Poultry(中国家禽), 2017, 39(15): 12.
[6] Iris U, Raquel T. V, Lorena M. P. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2015, 80: 80.
[7] WANG Huan-huan, ZHANG Le, LI Qing-hai, et al(王欢欢, 张乐, 李庆海, 等). China Poultry(中国家禽), 2014, 36(21): 12.
[8] LI Rui-cheng, SHANG Yong-biao, GUAN Jun-feng(李瑞成, 尚永彪, 管俊峰). Meat Research(肉类研究), 2010，(10): 54.
[9] JIANG Ming, LI Zhi, DONG Lian-hua, et al(蒋明, 李智, 董莲花, 等). Animal Science Abroad—Pigs and Poultry(国外畜牧学—猪与禽), 2016, 36(4): 77.
[10] Fernandes B, Teresa Matamá, Diana Guimarães, et al. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, 2016, 29(6): 707.
[11] Rosenthal M H, Kreider J W, Shiman R. Anal. Biochem.，1973, 56: 91.
[12] Matsuda H，Hirata N，Kawaguchi Y, et al. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 2005, 28: 1229.
[13] WANG Ya-lan, LIU Zi-jun, LI Qi-ling, et al(王亚兰, 刘子君, 李绮玲，等). Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine(辽宁中医杂志), 2018, 45(1): 111.
[14] TU Cai-xia, ZHANG Rong-xin, LIU Ya-ling, et al(涂彩霞, 张荣鑫, 刘亚玲, 等). Chinese Journal of Dermatology (中华皮肤科杂志), 2006，(7): 400.
[15] TIAN Ying-gang, ZHAO Xi-yan, QIAO Juan-juan, et al(田颖刚, 赵溪雁, 乔娟娟, 等). Science and Technology of Food Industry(食品工业科技), 2013, 34(12): 86.
[16] Delijewski M, Beberok A, Otreba M, et al. Environmental Research, 2014, 134: 309.
[17] IUPAC Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature, 1998.
[18] ICH. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology Q2B.
[19] Ito S, Wakamatsu K, Ozeki H. Analytical Biochemistry, 1993, 215(2): 273.
[20] Kayatz P, Thumann G, Luther T T, et al. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2001, 42(1)：241.