|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectral Characteristics Analysis and Remote Sensing Retrieval of COD Concentration |
CHEN Yao1, 2, HUANG Chang-ping1*, ZHANG Li-fu1, QIAO Na1, 2 |
1. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract Organic pollutants are the main source of water pollution. The degree of organic pollution in water bodies can be comprehensively reflected by chemical oxygen demand (COD) indicator. Compared with the traditional methods, which are highly time-consuming and cause secondary pollution, remote sensing techniques can detect water COD quickly and effectively, particularly over large areas. However, due to complex composition of COD, detecting water CODusing remote sensing technology is still insufficient, and the spectral response mechanism of COD in the visible-short-wave infrared range is not yet clear. To clarify the spectral response mechanism of water COD, the reflectance spectra of 45 different concentrations of COD standard solution (potassium hydrogen phthalate) were measured by using PSR hyperspectral instrument in the laboratory simulation environment in this study. The continuum removal and reflectance normalization methods were used to analyze the spectral characteristics of COD standard solution with different concentrations, and results showed that with the increasing of COD concentration, the water reflectance spectra increased gradually in the visible-short-wave infrared range, as well as the spectral response increased rapidly in the range of 540~580 and 1 000~1 060 nm, showing the three-stage frequency doubling of —OH stretching vibration and the combined frequency absorption characteristics of —CH stretching vibration and deformation vibration. In order to further verify the effectiveness of sensitive bands, the partial least squares (PLS) regression models were developed by using sensitive bands and full bands, respectively. The correlation coefficient and RMSE of COD standard solution based on the sensitive bands were 0.972 and 39.629 mg·L-1, respectively, while the correlation coefficient and RMSE based on full bands were 0.961 and 46.639 mg·L-1, respectively. It showed that for COD standard solution that is not interfered byexternal factors, high accuracy can be achieved with only a small number of sensitive bands, even higher than the full bands model. The model retrieval accuracy based on the sensitive bands was also significantly better than the accuracy based on full bands when the model are applied to the field-measured water spectra. The results suggested that using the 540~580 and 1 000~1 060 nm sensitive bands can effectively improve the accuracy of detecting water COD, and significantly advance our ability for large-area rapid monitoring of COD using remote sensing in practical cases.
|
Received: 2018-12-10
Accepted: 2019-03-13
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HUANG Chang-ping
E-mail: huangcp@radi.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Andreja Drolc, Janez Vrtovsek. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 101(11): 4228.
[2] Hu Y, Wen Y, Wang X. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016, 227: 393.
[3] Ma J. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2017, 14: 37.
[4] Liu F, Zheng P, Huang B, et al. A Review on Optical Measurement Method of Chemical Oxygen Demand in Water Bodies. In Li D, Li Z (eds) Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture IX. CCTA 2015. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol 478. Cham: Springer,2016.
[5] XIE Qi-meng, LIN Mao-sen, YANG Guo-fan, et al(解启蒙, 林茂森, 杨国范, 等). China Rural Water and Hydropower(中国农村水利水电), 2017, (10): 57.
[6] Yang B, Liu Y, Ou F, et al. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2011, 10: 2703.
[7] HUANG Miao-fen, SONG Qing-jun, MAO Zhi-hua, et al(黄妙芬, 宋庆君, 毛志华, 等). Acta Oceanological Sinica(海洋学报), 2011, 33(3): 47.
[8] Gholizadeh M H, Melesse A M, Reddi L. Sensors, 2016, 16(8): 1298.
[9] Kumar V, Sharma A, Chawla A, et al. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016, 188(3): 137.
[10] ZHANG Bing, LI Jun-sheng, WANG Qiao, et al(张 兵, 李俊生, 王 桥, 等). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Inland Water(内陆水体高光谱遥感). Beijing: Science Press(北京:科学出版社), 2012.
[11] WANG Xiao-yong, TANG Jun-wu, LI Tong-ji, et al(汪小勇, 唐军武, 李铜基, 等). Ocean Technology(海洋技术), 2012, 31(1): 72.
[12] Lu Y, Qian W, Lyu C, et al. Optical Review, 2013, 20(6): 509.
[13] CHEN Yuan-yuan, WANG Zhi-bin, WANG Zhao-ba(陈媛媛, 王志斌, 王召巴). Infrared and Laser Engineering(红外与激光工程), 2014, 43(8): 2715.
[14] FENG Wei-wei, LI Ling-wei, LI Wei-ran, et al(冯巍巍, 李玲伟, 李未然, 等). Acta Photonica Sinica(光子学报), 2012, 41(8): 883. |
[1] |
LIANG Ye-heng1, DENG Ru-ru1, 2*, LIANG Yu-jie1, LIU Yong-ming3, WU Yi4, YUAN Yu-heng5, AI Xian-jun6. Spectral Characteristics of Sediment Reflectance Under the Background of Heavy Metal Polluted Water and Analysis of Its Contribution to
Water-Leaving Reflectance[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 111-117. |
[2] |
FENG Hai-kuan1, 2, YUE Ji-bo3, FAN Yi-guang2, YANG Gui-jun2, ZHAO Chun-jiang1, 2*. Estimation of Potato Above-Ground Biomass Based on VGC-AGB Model and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2876-2884. |
[3] |
JIN Chun-bai1, YANG Guang1*, LU Shan2*, LIU Wen-jing1, LI De-jun1, ZHENG Nan1. Band Selection Method Based on Target Saliency Analysis in Spatial Domain[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2952-2959. |
[4] |
GAO Yu1, SUN Xue-jian1*, LI Guang-hua2, ZHANG Li-fu1, QU Liang2, ZHANG Dong-hui1, CHANG Jing-jing2, DAI Xiao-ai3. Study on the Derivation of Paper Viscosity Spectral Index Based on Spectral Information Expansion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2960-2966. |
[5] |
KONG Bo1, YU Huan2*, SONG Wu-jie2, 3, HOU Yu-ting2, XIANG Qing2. Hyperspectral Characteristics and Quantitative Remote Sensing Inversion of Gravel Grain Size in the North Tibetan Plateau[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2381-2390. |
[6] |
ZHANG Xia1, WANG Wei-hao1, 2*, SUN Wei-chao1, DING Song-tao1, 2, WANG Yi-bo1, 2. Soil Zn Content Inversion by Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data and Considering Soil Types[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2019-2026. |
[7] |
WANG Hui-min1, 2, YU Lei1, XU Kai-lei1, 2, JIANG Xiao-guang1, 2, WAN Yu-qing1, 2*. Estimation of Salt Content of Saline Soil in Arid Areas Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2278-2286. |
[8] |
CAO Yang1, 2, LI Yan-hong1, 2*. Study on the Effects of NO2 Pollution Under COVID-19 Epidemic
Prevention and Control in Urumqi[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1981-1987. |
[9] |
ZHANG Chao1*, SU Xiao-yu1, XIA Tian2, YANG Ke-ming3, FENG Fei-sheng4. Monitoring the Degree of Pollution in Different Varieties of Maize Under Copper and Lead Stress[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1268-1274. |
[10] |
LI Ai-min1, FAN Meng2*, QIN Guang-duo2, WANG Hai-long2, XU You-cheng2. Water Quality Parameter COD Retrieved From Remote Sensing Based on Convolutional Neural Network Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 651-656. |
[11] |
XU Long-xin1, 2, 3, 4, SUN Yong-hua2, 3, 4*, WU Wen-huan1, ZOU Kai2, 3, 4, HE Shi-jun2, 3, 4, ZHAO Yuan-ming2, 3, 4, YE Miao2, 3, 4, ZHANG Xiao-han2, 3, 4. Research on Classification of Construction Waste Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3927-3934. |
[12] |
DAI Qian-cheng1, XIE Yong1*, TAO Zui2, SHAO Wen1, PENG Fei-yu1, SU Yi1, YANG Bang-hui2. Research on Fluorescence Retrieval Algorithm of Chlorophyll a Concentration in Nanyi Lake[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3941-3947. |
[13] |
FENG Tian-shi1, 2, 3, PANG Zhi-guo1, 2, 3*, JIANG Wei1, 2, 3. Remote Sensing Retrieval of Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Lake Chaohu Based on Zhuhai-1 Hyperspectral Satellite[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2642-2648. |
[14] |
ZHANG Jie1, 2, XU Bo1, FENG Hai-kuan1, JING Xia2, WANG Jiao-jiao1, MING Shi-kang1, FU You-qiang3, SONG Xiao-yu1*. Monitoring Nitrogen Nutrition and Grain Protein Content of Rice Based on Ensemble Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(06): 1956-1964. |
[15] |
JING Xia1, ZHANG Jie1, 2, WANG Jiao-jiao2, MING Shi-kang2, FU You-qiang3, FENG Hai-kuan2, SONG Xiao-yu2*. Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Remote Sensing
Monitoring of Rice Yields[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1620-1627. |
|
|
|
|