|
|
|
|
|
|
Identification of Sodium Ion Spectral Characteristics of Halophytes Based on Parameter Optimized SVM Method |
DENG Lai-fei1, 2, ZHANG Fei1, 2, 3*, QI Ya-xiao1, 2, YUAN Jie1, 2 |
1. College of Resources & Environmental Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2. Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
3. Engineering Research Center of Central Asia Geoinformation Development and Utilization, National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Urumqi 830002, China |
|
|
Abstract There are a wide range of saline soils in Xinjiang. It covers a large area. Various types of halophytes which have prominent significance for improving the saline lands, maintaining ecological stability and promoting ecological balance grow on these saline soils. Studies have shown that many halophytes absorb a large amount of sodium. Both sodium and potassium can increase the cell osmotic pressure to adapt to the high-salt condition, producing turgor pressure and promoting cell elongation. So it is beneficial to its growth and can partially replace the function of potassium. Thus, mastering the sodium characteristics of halophytes is helpful to understand the long-term adaptation and response of halophytes to the ecological environment. In this paper, HyperSpectral technique was used to effectively explore the characteristics of leaf sodium. Firstly, the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and db5 wavelet were used to decompose the original spectral in 9 layers, and the optimal decomposition layer is 5 layers. Secondly, the original spectral were decomposed by db5 wavelet in 5 layers, and the wavelet vegetation indices were created by the decomposed high-frequency components and low-frequency components. We selected the wavelet vegetation indices which could sensitively characterize sodium ion content of halophytes. Finally, the SVR, LS-SVR, PSO-SVR and PSO-LS-SVR models were used to estimate the sodium ion content of halophytes vegetation. The results were compared to the models created by the spectral vegetation indices of original spectral. In addition, we used the partial least squares regression model as a comparison to evaluate the advantages of the parameter-optimized support vector machine method in estimating the sodium ion content of the leaves of the halophytes vegetation using hyperspectral techniques. The results showed that: (1) The prediction results of the five models showed that PSO can effectively optimize the parameters (c, g) of SVR and LS-SVR models, and improve the accuracy and prediction ability of the models. The optimized models had the advantages of high prediction accuracy, strong generalization ability and good robustness performance. (2) The model constructed by the multiple wavelet index was an inversion model of integrated multi-scale and multi-resolution data, which can reflect the vegetation information from different aspects. Therefore, the four models constructed by the multiple wavelet index were superior to the models constructed by the single wavelet index. (3) Contrasting the inversion results of two types index, the Na+ content prediction model constructed by a single wavelet vegetation index can achieve a better prediction results. The single spectral index is not effective in estimating Na+ content, which is because the wavelet transform can reduce the noise of the original spectral and highlight the detailed feature of the spectral, improving the prediction results. The model accuracy and prediction effect of the integrated wavelet vegetation index were better than those of the integrated spectral index. More spectral subtle feature can be highlighted by wavelet transform, thus improving the ability of retrieving Na+ content in leaves by HyperSpectral method.
|
Received: 2018-11-09
Accepted: 2019-03-12
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Fei
E-mail: zhangfei3s@163.com
|
|
[1] Yi Q X, Bao A M, Wang Q, et al. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2013, 90(1): 144.
[2] Jin X, Yang G, Li Z, et al. Precision Agriculture, 2018, 19(1): 1.
[3] Qi Y, Dennison P E, Jolly W M, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 150(7): 198.
[4] Zhang C, Wang Q, Liu F, et al. Measurement, 2017, 97: 149.
[5] Zhang L, Zhou Z, Zhang G, et al. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 2014,47: 593.
[6] Mirzaie M, Darvishzadeh R, Shakiba A, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 2014, 26: 1.
[7] LI Yuan-yuan, CHANG Qing-rui, LIU Xiu-ying, et al(李媛媛, 常庆瑞, 刘秀英, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(16): 135.
[8] LI Zhe, ZHANG Fei, FENG Hai-kuan, et al(李 哲, 张 飞, 冯海宽, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2017, 22(11): 1128002.
[9] Liu M, Liu X, Wu L, et al. Computers & Geosciences, 2011, 37(9): 1254.
[10] LI Jun, LI Pei-jun, GUO Jian-cong, et al(李 军, 李培军, 郭建聪). Progress in Natural Science(自然科学进展), 2007, 17(11): 1500.
[11] XIAO Yan, JIANG Qi-gang, WANG Bin, et al(肖 艳, 姜琦刚, 王 斌, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2016, 32(4): 211.
[12] ZHANG Jian-wei, JIANG Qi, LIU Xuan-ran, et al(张建伟, 江 琦, 刘轩然, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2017, 33(11): 75.
[13] YANG Liu, SUN Jin-hua, FENG Zhong-ke, et al(杨 柳, 孙金华, 冯仲科, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2016, 47(8): 273. |
[1] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[2] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[3] |
LI He1, WANG Yu2, FAN Kai2, MAO Yi-lin2, DING Shi-bo3, SONG Da-peng3, WANG Meng-qi3, DING Zhao-tang1*. Evaluation of Freezing Injury Degree of Tea Plant Based on Deep
Learning, Wavelet Transform and Visible Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 234-240. |
[4] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[5] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[6] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[7] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[8] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[9] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[10] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[11] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[12] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[13] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[14] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[15] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
|
|
|
|