|
|
|
|
|
|
The Research on Quantitative Analysis of Feed Crude Fat and Corase Fiber Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Variables Selection Methods |
HAO Yong, WU Wen-hui, SHANG Qing-yuan |
School of Mechatronics & Vehicle Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China |
|
|
Abstract Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) combined with partial least squares (PLS) method was used to achieve rapid quantitative analysis of crude fat and corase fiber in feed. The norris-williams derivation (NW) and multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) methods were used to pretreat the spectrum, and the monte carlo based uninformative variable elimination (MCUVE), variables combination population analysis (VCPA) and interval variable iterative space shrinkage approach (iVISSA) were used to select and optimize the variables of the spectrum. PLS was used for the establishment of the spectral calibration model, and the parameters of calibration set correlation coefficient (Rc), root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV), prediction set correlation coefficient (Rp) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) were used to evaluate the models. Compared with other pretreatment methods, the RMSECV and RMSEP values of the spectral model after MSC treatment decreased, while the Rc and Rp values increased. In the crude fat quantitative analysis model, the RMSECV and Rc of the original spectral model were 0.21 and 0.87, RMSEP and Rp were 0.20 and 0.88, and the number of variables (Vn) was 1501. After selecting variables by MCUVE method, RMSECV and Rc were 0.17 and 0.92, RMSEP and Rp were 0.19 and 0.89, and Vn was 400. For VCPA-PLS model, the RMSECV and Rc were 0.206 and 0.87, RMSEP and Rp were 0.25 and 0.81, and Vn was 12. For iVISSA-PLS model, the RMSECV and Rc were 0.21 and 0.86, RMSEP and Rp were 0.20 and 0.87, and Vn was 20. In the corase fiber model, the RMSECV and Rc of the original PLS model were 0.28 and 0.91, RMSEP and Rp were 0.23 and 0.95, and Vn was 1 501. After MCUVE selection, the RMSECV and Rc of the model were 0.23 and 0.95, RMSEP and Rp were 0.25 and 0.94, and Vn was 740. After VCPA selection, the RMSECV and Rc of the model were 0.27 and 0.91, RMSEP and Rp were 0.30 and 0.91, and Vn was 11. After iVISSA selection, the RMSECV and Rc of the model were 0.29 and 0.90, RMSEP and Rp were 0.27 and 0.93, and Vn was 20. The results showed that the MSC method could effectively improve the spectral quality and eliminate the spectral translation error; the MCUVE variable selection method could simplify the model to improve the model accuracy and stability, and establish the optimal model. In the crude fat quantitative analysis model, after the MSC-processed spectrum was selected by MCUVE, the remaining 400 were used to establish the PLS model, Rc and Rp were improved by 0.05 and 0.01 compared to the full-spectrum model, and the RMSECV and RMSEP were reduced to 0.17 and 0.19; The model selected by VCPA and iVISSA had almost the same result as the full-spectrum model, and its greatest feature was that only 12 and 20 variables were selected. In the corase fiber model, 740 variables selected by MCUVE were used to establish the PLS model with Rc and Rp of 0.95 and 0.94, RMSECV and RMSEP of 0.23 and 0.23, respectively; VCPA and iVISSA used 11 and 12 variables to establish the regression model, but its model results were all worse than the MCUVE model. The establishment of MSC-MCUVE-PLS quantitative analysis model using feed near-infrared spectroscopy could effectively quantify crude fat and corase fiber in feed.
|
Received: 2018-11-21
Accepted: 2019-03-19
|
|
|
[1] Sagrario M, Ana S, Adela MF, et al. Talanta, 2017, 162: 597.
[2] Patrica A H, Sarah N, Harry B C, et al. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 2018, 71: 13.
[3] Luisa M, Ilaria F, Giuseppina A, et al. Food Chemistry, 2018, 267: 240.
[4] Kelton S S, Anderson S S, Telma W L, et al. Journal of Computer Science, 2015, 11(4): 621.
[5] Hideyuki S, Junji M. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2018, 192: 236.
[6] Asmund R, Frans B, Soren B E. Trebds in Analytical Chemistry, 2009, 28(10): 1201.
[7] Li C, Zhao T L, Li C, et al. Food Chemistry, 2017, 221: 990.
[8] Liu X W, Cui X Y, Yu X M, et al. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2017, 28: 1447.
[9] WU Jing-zhu, WANG Feng-zhu, WANG Li-li, et al(吴静珠, 汪凤珠, 王丽丽, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2015, 35(1): 99.
[10] Yun Y H, Wang W T, Deng B C, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2015, 862: 14.
[11] Yang Y N, Xie F F, Yan B, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2017, 170: 102.
[12] ZHAO Huan, HUAN Ke-wei, ZHENG Feng, et al(赵 环, 宦克为, 郑 峰, 等). Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(长春理工大学学报·自然科学版), 2016, 39(5): 51.
[13] Deng B C, Yun Y H, Liang Y Z, et al. Analyst, 2014, 139: 4836.
[14] Deng B C, Yun Y H, Ma P, et al. Analyst, 2015, 140: 1876.
[15] Ripoll G, Lobon S, Joy M. Meat Science, 2018, 143: 24.
[16] Fien D L, Elisabeth P, Hasna D, et al. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2018, 151: 274.
[17] Pedro S S, Andreia S, Ana C, et al. Food Chemistry, 2018, 242: 196. |
[1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
[2] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[3] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
[4] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
[5] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[6] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
[7] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[8] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
[9] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[10] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[11] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[12] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
[13] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
[14] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
[15] |
GUO Ge1, 3, 4, ZHANG Meng-ling3, 4, GONG Zhi-jie3, 4, ZHANG Shi-zhuang3, 4, WANG Xiao-yu2, 5, 6*, ZHOU Zhong-hua1*, YANG Yu2, 5, 6, XIE Guang-hui3, 4. Construction of Biomass Ash Content Model Based on Near-Infrared
Spectroscopy and Complex Sample Set Partitioning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3143-3149. |
|
|
|
|