|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Inversion of Water Quality Parameters in Industrial and Mining Cities from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing |
PENG Ling1, MEI Jun-jun1, WANG Na1, XU Su-ning1*, LIU Wen-bo1, XING Gu-lian1, CHEN Qi-hao2 |
1. China Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China
2. Faculty of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China |
|
|
Abstract Industrial and mining cities are affected by activities of these industries that damage the water environment to various degrees and make water pollution a particular problem. At present, field sampling with a grid pattern and indoor laboratory analysis are mainly used for routine water quality monitoring. However, the environment is complex and variable, and spatial differences are considerable. Therefore, the survey sites render limited representativeness, low overall accuracy, and poor efficiency, making it difficult to realize dynamic monitoring regionally. In this study, we took Daye City under Huangshi City, Hubei Province, as the research area. Daye is an important mining city that thrives on mining. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) hyperspectral imaging, ground spectral measurements, and water body sampling were carried out simultaneously. As a result, 49-band hyperspectral imaging data and water body spectra with a spectral resolution of 1 nm were obtained. The imaging data have a wavelength range of 505~890 nm, a spectral resolution of 7.78 nm, and a spatial resolution of 30 cm. After outlier removal, spectral calibration and radiometric correction were performed on the hyperspectral imaging data and spectral measurements and a comparative analysis was carried out between the spectral data of various water bodies located in the study area in terms of their absorption/reflectance spectra and the morphological features of their spectral curves. We subsequently extracted 25 spectral features from these hyperspectral images and measurement spectra, and these were classified under the following categories: morphological features of reflectance spectra, morphological features of continuum-removed spectra, morphological features of third-derivative spectra, and 4-value spectral encoding. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the water quality parameters and the spectral features of the water specimens and to select the water quality parameters and spectral features that were significantly correlated with each other. On this basis, a multivariate linear inversion model was constructed for the water quality parameters using the following model variables, which were selected via stepwise regression analysis: the maximum reflectance and its corresponding wavelength, symmetry, and spectral code Ⅲ, and the maximum and minimum third derivative values. F-tests and t-tests were then performed on this model. After the tests, our inversion model was used to obtain the water quality parameters of typical water bodies, such as tailings ponds, rivers, and lakes, from the hyperspectral imaging data from the study area. We have thus succeeded in achieving the rapid acquisition of water quality information in a “point-to-surface” manner. The results of this study indicate that our model has high inversion accuracies for water quality parameters such as pH, hardness (Ca2++Mg2+), potassium-to-chloride ratio (K+/Cl-), and magnesium-to-alkalinity ratio [Mg2+/(HCO3-+CO2-3)]. Between these parameters, pH has the lowest coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.669, whereas the magnesium-to-alkalinity ratio has the highest R2 of 0.895. The relative root mean square errors (RRMSE) were generally lower than 28%. In contrast, the inversion accuracy of our model for total dissolved solids (TDS) was relatively low, and its R2 and RRMSE were 0.463 and 36.762%, respectively. This study proposes a hyperspectral remote-sensing quantitative inversion method of water quality parameters based on spectral curve patterns. The method achieves hyperspectral quantitative inversion of water quality parameters such as pH, hardness and magnesium-to-alkalinity ratio, and it provides a new technique for dynamic monitoring of the regional water environment.
|
Received: 2018-07-06
Accepted: 2018-11-10
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
XU Su-ning
E-mail: xusn@mail.cigem.gov.cn
|
|
[1] DUAN Rui-qi, DONG Yan-hui, ZHOU Peng-peng, et al(段瑞琪,董艳辉,周鹏鹏,等). Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology(水文地质工程地质),2017,44(4):23.
[2] ZHOU Yi, ZHOU Wei-qi, WANG Shi-xin, et al(周 艺,周伟奇,王世新,等). Advances in Water Science(水科学进展),2004,15(3):312.
[3] Palmer S C J, Kutser T, Hunter P D. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 157:1.
[4] ZHANG Bing, SHEN Qian, LI Jun-sheng, et al(张 兵,申 茜,李俊生,等). Journal of Lake Sciences(湖泊科学),2009,21(2):182.
[5] YANG Ting, ZHANG Hui, WANG Qiao, et al(杨 婷,张 慧,王 桥,等). Environmental Science(环境科学),2011,32(11):3207.
[6] PAN Bang-long, WANG Xian-hua, ZHU Jin, et al(潘邦龙,王先华,朱 进,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2013,33(6):1665.
[7] Olmanson L G, Brezonik P L, Bauer M E. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2013, 130: 254.
[8] Brezonik P L, Olmanson L G, Finlay J C, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 157: 199.
[9] Kutser T, Paavel B, Verpoorter C, et al. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8(6): 497.
[10] SONG Ting, ZHOU Wen-lin, LIU Jun-zhi, et al(宋 挺,周文鳞,刘军志,等). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报),2017,37(3):888.
[11] Zabcic N, Rivard B, Ong C, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2014, 32: 152.
[12] Rostom N G, Shalaby A A, Issa Y M, et al. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2017, 20: S39.
[13] LIU Sheng-wei, GAN Fu-ping, WANG Run-sheng(刘圣伟,甘甫平,王润生). Geological Bulletin of China(地质通报),2003,22(11-12):1013.
[14] Van Der Meer F. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2004, 5(1): 55.
[15] SU Hong-jun, DU Pei-jun, SHENG Ye-hua(苏红军,杜培军,盛业华). Application Research of Computers(计算机应用研究),2008,25(2):390. |
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[5] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[6] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[7] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[8] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[9] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[10] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[11] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[12] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[13] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[14] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
[15] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
|
|
|
|