LED红蓝光连续光照及其光强对生菜生长及矿质元素吸收的影响

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)08-2474-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2114 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Red light and blue light are the main spectra of photosynthesis and photomorphogenesis in plants, and also is a developing tendency of light source in plant factory. Therefore, to realize the application of continuous light in plant factory, the response characteristics and mechanism of plants to continuous light in red and blue spectra need to be explored. The effect of continuous light and its intensity on the growth and mineral elements absorption of lettuce was investigated by ICP-AES technology in an environmental-controlled plant factory. Five lettuce cultivars were cultivated under normal light(12 h/12 h) and continuous light (24 h/0 h) in experiment 1, and grown under continuous light with five light intensity(80，120，160，200 and 240 μmol·m^-2·s^-1) in experiment 2. The results showed that dry weights and dry weight ratios of lettuce significantly increased during 30 days’ continuous light, and increased with light intensity. However, continuous light only enhanced fresh weight in first 15 days, which also increased with light intensity. 30 days’ continuous light had no positive effect on fresh weight, even significantly reduced the fresh weight of Yidali cultivar. Compared with normal light, 30 days’ continuous light significantly reduced the Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn contents, but slightly or significantly enhanced the accumulation of these mineral elements. Under different light intensity, the contents of Ca, Fe, Cu, and Zn decreased with light intensity, the accumulation of Ca and Fe increased with light intensity, while that of Cu and Zn were not affected by light intensity. Content and accumulation of Mg increased first and then decreased with the increase of light intensity. The content of Mn element was not significantly affected by light intensity, but the accumulation increased with the increase of light intensity. In addition, 30 days’ continuous light induced severe leaf chlorosis and necrosis, and this negative effect aggravated with light intensity, which indicated that the decrease of mineral element content aggravated the injury of continuous light to some extent. In conclusion, 15 days’ continuous light could enhance lettuce yield remarkably. However, although 30 days’ continuous light improved the dry weight, it had no positive effect on yield and induced the decrease of mineral elements contents and leaf injury. Even though lettuce plants grown under continuous light with low light intensity (80 and 120 μmol·m^-2·s^-1) had no leaf injury and relative higher mineral elements contents, it had no positive effect on yield. This study indicated that short-term continuous light is more suitable for the cultivation of lettuce in the plant factory, and can obtain higher yield than energy input. The decrease of mineral element content may be one of the mechanisms of long-term continuous light injury.

Key words：ICP-AES; Photoperiod; Biomass; Cultivar; Nutrient absorption

Received: 2018-06-12 Accepted: 2018-10-06

ZTFLH:

O657.3

Corresponding Authors: LIU Wen-ke E-mail: liuwenke@caas.cn

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)08-2474-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2019/V39/I08/2474

[1] Amoozgar A, Mohammadi A, Sabzalian M R. Photosynthetica, 2017, 55(1): 85.
[2] Haque M S, Kjaer K H, Rosenqvist E, et al. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6: 522.
[3] Ohyama K, Omura Y, Kozai T. HortScience, 2005, 40(5): 1304.
[4] YU Yi, YANG Qi-chang, LIU Wen-ke(余意, 杨其长, 刘文科). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 2015, 26(11): 3361.
[5] Pettersen R I, Torre S, Gislerød H R. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 125(2): 82.
[6] Van Gestel N, Nesbit A D, Green C, et al. Physiologia Plantarum, 2005, 125(2): 235.
[7] Velez-Ramirez A I, Van I W, Vreugdenhil D, et al. Trends in Plant Science, 2011, 16(6): 310.
[8] Kang J H, Krishnakumar S, Atulba S L S, et al. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2013, 54: 501.
[9] Kitaya Y, Niu G, Kozai T, et al. HortScience, 1998, 33: 988.
[10] Goto E. Ⅶ International Symposium on Lighting Horticultural Systems-Acta Horticulturae, 2012, 956：37.
[11] Goins G D, Yorio N C, Sanwo M M, et al. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1997, 48: 1407.
[12] Velez-Ramirez A I, Heuvelink E, Van Ieperen W, et al. Acta Horticulturae, 2012, 956: 51.
[13] Sysoeva M I, Markovskaya E F, Shibaeva T. Plant Stress, 2010, 4: 5.
[14] Arve L E, Terfa M T, Gislerød H R, et al. Plant Cell and Environment, 2013, 36 (2): 382.
[15] Velez-Ramirez A I, Dunner-Planella G, Vreugdenhil D, et al. Functional Plant Biology, 2017, 44(6): 597.
[16] LIU Xiao-ying, XU Zhi-gang, CHANG Tao-tao, et al(刘晓英，徐志刚，常涛涛，等). Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica(西北植物学报), 2010, 30(4): 725.
[17] LI Hai-yun, LIU Huan-hong(李海云, 刘焕红). Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin(中国农学通报), 2013, 29(16): 74.
[18] ZHA Ling-yan, LIU Wen-ke (查凌雁, 刘文科). Plant Physiology Journal(植物生理学报), 2017, 53(9): 1735.
[19] Cakmak I, Kirkby E A. Physiologia Plantarum, 2008, 133：692.