|
|
|
|
|
|
Study on the Slit Function of Atmospheric Trace Gas Differential Optical Absorption Spectrometer |
HUANG Shan1, 2, SI Fu-qi1*, ZHAO Min-jie1, ZHOU Hai-jin1, JIANG Yu1 |
1. Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mecchnics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
2. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, spaceborne atmospheric trace gas differential absorption spectrometer is introduced. This instrument is a new optical remote sensing instrument whose spectral resolution is better than 0.5 nm. With high resolution (spectral resolution 0.3~0.5 nm), wide wavelength range (240~720 nm), large field (114°field of view corresponds to the ground 2 600 km) features, the load is pushed and swept to achieve 1 day global coverage monitoring. This instrument acquires high accuracy UV/Vis radiation scattered or reflected by air or earth surface, and can monitor distribution and variation of trace gases (NO2, SO2, O3 and so on) based on differential optical absorption spectrum algorithm. Calibration is the premise when formally putting this instrument into operation. At the same time, in order to obtain the spectral characteristics of the load, on-ground spectral calibration is needed. According to the large field, wide wavelength range, high spatial resolution and high spectral resolution of this load, a set of spectral calibration system based on two dimensional turntables is set up. This system can finish the spectral calibration of full field of view. Spectral calibration was performed using standard spectral line method with mercury lamp as calibration source. The spectral response function is an important parameter to describe the spectral response characteristics of the spectrometer. The spectral resolution of the load can be obtained according to the spectral response function. It is also the key input parameter of inversion which is based on DOAS method. The accuracy of the spectral response function directly affects the inversion results of the atmospheric trace gas. According to the spectral response data of load tests, three function models of Gauss, Lorentz and Voigt are selected as the potential spectral response functions. In order to find the most suitable function model, two kinds of contrast tests are carried out. First, the Gauss function, Lorentz function and Voigt function are used to fit the monochromatic light response data of the load, and the sum of the squares of the three kinds of functions is used as the evaluation criterion, the fitting results show that the sum of the residual squares of the Gauss function as the slit function is 0.01, and the sum of the residual squares of the Lorentz and Voigt functions as the slit function is 0.033 and 0.021 respectively. From the analysis of the fitting results of monochromatic light response data, the Gauss function could be used as a spectral response function model of load. In order to further verify this conclusion, DOAS inversion of NO2 experiment was carried out, and the influence of three kinds of function models on inversion was investigated. The NO2 sample gas test was carried out in the laboratory. The atmospheric scattering light was incident through the 30 cm×40 cm quartz window to the load slit, and the NO2 sample pool was placed in the middle of the load slit and the quartz window. The data obtained were NO2 like gas absorption spectra, and then it was filled into the N2 gas to obtain the reference spectrum of the inversion. The experiment was carried out in sunny weather and can be completed in a short time, which can reduce the influence of weather conditions on the inversion results. In the experiment, the concentration of NO2 sample gas is 8.481 2×1016 molec·cm-2. During the inversion, Gauss function, Lorentz function, Voigt function were set as slit function respectively. The results of NO2 concentration corresponding to the different functional models of three groups are analyzed, and the function model is evaluated according to the relative deviation of the inversion results. The experimental results show that the relative deviation of the Gauss function as a slit function is 5.6%, and the relative deviation of the Lorentz and Voigt functions as the slit functions is 28% and 15.1%, respectively. The fitting results of spectral response data and gas sample inversion results show that the Gauss function can be used as a spectral response function model of load.
|
Received: 2018-04-25
Accepted: 2018-08-11
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SI Fu-qi
E-mail: sifuqi@aiofm.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Chan K L, Pohler D, Kuhlmann G, et al. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2011, 4: 6615.
[2] ZHAO Min-jie, SI Fu-qi, JIANG Yu, et al(赵敏杰, 司福祺, 江 宇, 等). Optics and Precision Engineering(光学精密工程), 2013, 21(03): 567.
[3] SI Fu-qi, JIANG Yu, JIANG Qing-wu, et al(司福祺, 江 宇, 江庆五, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2013, 33(3): 244.
[4] Dobber M R, Dirksen R J, Levelt P F, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(5): 1209.
[5] ZHOU Hai-jin, LIU Wen-qing, SI Fu-qi, et al(周海金, 刘文清, 司福祺, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2012, 32(11): 2881.
[6] QI Xiang-dong, HAN Peng-peng, PAN Ming-zhong, et al(齐向东, 撖芃芃, 潘明忠, 等). Optics and Precision Engineering(光学精密工程), 2011, 19(12): 2870.
[7] YIN Zeng-qian, WU Chen, GONG Wan-jue, et al(尹增谦,武 臣,宫琬珏,等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2013, 62(12): 212.
[8] Barry P S, Shepanski J, Segal C. Proc. SPIE, 2002, 4480: 231.
[9] DAI Cong-ming, WEI He-li, CHEN Xiu-hong(戴聪明, 魏合理, 陈秀红). Infrared and Laser Engineering(红外与激光工程), 2013, 42(1): 174. |
[1] |
WANG Jian-wei1, 2, LI Wei-yan1, SUN Jian-ying1, LI Bing1, CHEN Xin-wen1, TAN Zheng1, ZHAO Na1, LIU Yang-yang1, 3, LÜ Qun-bo1, 3*. Fast Spectral Calibration Method of Spectral Imager[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2013-2017. |
[2] |
CHENG Liang-xiao1, 2, TAO Jin-hua1*, ZHOU Hai-jin3, YU Chao1, FAN Meng1, WANG Ya-peng4, WANG Zhi-bao5, CHEN Liang-fu1. Evaluations of Environmental Trace Gases Monitoring Instrument (EMI) Level 1 Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3881-3886. |
[3] |
PEI Guo-chao1, 2, LI Yuan3, 4*, BAI Ting-zhu1, 2. Temporal Variation Model of Ultraviolet Hyperspectral Solar Reference Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2332-2338. |
[4] |
CHANG Zhen1, 2, ZHAO Min-jie1*, WANG Yu1, SI Fu-qi1, ZHOU Hai-jin1, LIU Wen-qing1. Study on the Spectral Features of Space-Borne Aluminum Diffuser[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(04): 997-1000. |
[5] |
ZOU Yao-pu1, 2, ZHANG Lei1, 2, HAN Chang-pei2*, LI Li-bing2. Study of High Accuracy Spectral Calibration of Fourier Transform Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(04): 1268-1275. |
[6] |
XU Na, HU Xiu-qing*, CHEN Lin. Evaluation and Correction of Atmosphere Contamination on the Measurement of the Spectral Response of FY-2 Water Vapor Channels[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(08): 2325-2330. |
[7] |
MAO Jing-hua1, 2, WANG Yong-mei1,2*, SHI En-tao1, ZHANG Zhong-mou1, JIANG Fang1. Study on the Slitfunction Test Method Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Instrument[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(04): 1286-1290. |
[8] |
SHI Hai-liang, LI Zhi-wei, LUO Hai-yan, XIONG Wei . Error Correction of Spectral Calibration for Hyper-Spectral Atmosphere CO2 Monitoring Instrument[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(07): 2296-2299. |
[9] |
ZHAO Min-jie, SI Fu-qi*, LU Yi-huai, WANG Shi-mei, JIANG Yu,ZHOU Hai-jin, LIU Wen-qing. Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function of Space-Borne Quartz Volume Diffuser[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(05): 1565-1570. |
[10] |
LI Xin1, 2, ZHANG Li-ming1, 2*, CHEN Hong-yao1, 2, XU Wei-wei1, 2 . On-Orbit Multispectral Sensor Characterization Based on Spectral Tarps [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(03): 811-816. |
[11] |
LIN Jun, SHAO Jun, SONG Chao-yu,LI Yun-wei, LEI Yu-fei . High Precision Spectral Calibration Method of Fourier Interferometric Spectrometer [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35(12): 3534-3537. |
[12] |
ZHAO Min-jie, SI Fu-qi*, LU Yi-huai, WANG Yu, WANG Shi-mei, JIANG Yu, ZHOU Hai-jin, LIU Wen-qing . Spectral Calibration of Space-born Imaging Spectrometers Using Spectrum-Matching Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 35(07): 2049-2053. |
[13] |
SUN Ci1, 2, Bayanheshig1*, CUI Ji-cheng1, PAN Ming-zhong1, LI Xiao-tian1, TANG Yu-guo1 . Full-Field and Automatic Methodology of Spectral Calibration for PGP Imaging Spectrometer [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(08): 2289-2292. |
[14] |
WANG Ming-zhi, YAN Lei, YANG Bin, GOU Zhi-yang . Central Wavelength Shift Analysis between Laboratory and Field Spectral Calibrations of Grating Based Imaging Spectrometer [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(08): 2280-2285. |
[15] |
GOU Zhi-yang1,2, YAN Lei1, 2*, CHEN Wei1, 2, ZHAO Hong-ying1, 2, YIN Zhong-yi1, 2, DUAN Yi-ni1, 2 . Spectral Calibratioo of Hyperspectral Imager Based on Spectral Absorption Target[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(02): 571-574. |
|
|
|
|