|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investigation on the Volatility of Ammonium Nitrate Using Optical Tweezers |
| Lü Xi-juan, GAO Xiao-yan, MA Jia-bi*, ZHANG Yun-hong* |
| Institute of Chemical Physics, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Measurements of the particle-to-gas partitioning of semi-volatile atmospheric aerosols are crucial for providing more accurate descriptions of the compositional and size distributions of atmospheric aerosol. As a major component of semi-volatile aerosol species, ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) is ubiquitous in the sub-micron particulate matter, particularly in high pollution episodes. In order to further understand gas-particle partitioning of NH4NO3, determination of the saturated vapor pressure of NH4NO3 is needed. Here, we investigate the volatility of NH4NO3 at different relative humidities (RHs) using aerosol optical tweezers coupled with Raman spectroscopy as an instrument for sampling and detecting. According to the Maxwell equation, the vapor pressures at different RHs are calculated, and the values are (1.67±0.24)×10-3, (1.82±0.19)×10-3, (2.91±0.13)×10-3, (3.5±0.28)×10-3, (4.59±0.22)×10-3 and (6.64±0.3)×10-3 Pa, when the RH is 80%, 73%, 68%, 57.3%, 55.4%, 44.8% respectively. Obviously, the vapor pressures of NH4NO3 increase with RH decreasing, i.e. low RH promotes the evaporation of ammonium nitrate. Additionally, we also calculate the volatilizing flux of NH4NO3 at different RHs, and the values are in the range of (4.01±0.79)×10-7~(3.32±0.77)×10-8 mol·(s·m2)-1. The results obtained herein are of important significance in understanding the partitioning processes of semi-volatile aerosols.
|
|
Received: 2018-03-30
Accepted: 2018-08-05
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
MA Jia-bi, ZHANG Yun-hong
E-mail: majiabi@bit.edu.cn；yhz@bit.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Bouwman A F, Lee D S, Asman W A H, et al. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1997，11(4): 561.
[2] Renard J J, Calidonna S E, Henley M V. Journal of Hazardous Materials B, 2004，108(1-2): 29.
[3] James M, Lightstone T B O, Dan Imre. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2000，104(41)：9337.
[4] Hu Dawei, Chen Jianmin, Ye Xingnan, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2011，45(14): 2349.
[5] Chien Wen-ming, Chandra Dhanesh, Lau K H, et al. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2010，42(7): 846.
[6] Hong J, Äijälä Mikko, Hme S A K, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017，17(6): 4387.
[7] Zardini A A, Krieger U K. Optics Express, 2009, 17(6): 4659.
[8] Cai C, Stewart D J, Reid J P, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2015，119(4): 704.
[9] Wang L N, Cai C，Zhang Y H. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2017，121(36): 8551.
[10] Cai C, Tan S, Chen H, et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015, 17(44): 29753.
[11] Preston T C，Reid J P. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 2013，30(8): 2113.
[12] Miles R E, Walker J S, Burnham D R, et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012，14(9): 3037.
[13] Marshall F H, Miles R E H, Song Y C, et al. Chemical Science, 2016, 7(2): 1298.
[14] Xue H, Moyle A M, Magee N, et al. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2005, 62(12): 4310.
[15] Massman W J. Atmospheric Environment, 1998，32(6): 1111.
[16] Huffman J A, Docherty K S, Aiken A C, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2009，9(1): 2645. |
| [1] |
XU Qiu-yi1, 3, 4, ZHU Wen-yue3, 4, CHEN Jie2, 3, 4, LIU Qiang3, 4 *, ZHENG Jian-jie3, 4, YANG Tao2, 3, 4, YANG Teng-fei2, 3, 4. Calibration Method of Aerosol Absorption Coefficient Based on
Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 88-94. |
| [2] |
GUO He-qing1, 2, ZHANG Sheng-zi2*, LIU Xiao-meng2, JING Xu-feng1, WANG Hong-jun2. Research Progress of the Real-Time Detection System of Bioaerosols Based on Fluorescence Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2339-2347. |
| [3] |
LI Jing-yi1, 3, 4, YANG Xin1, 3, 4, ZHANG Ning2, YANG Xin-ting3, 4, WANG Zeng-li1*, LIU Huan3, 4*. Feasibility Study on Detecting the Freshness of Chilled Pork Based on Functionalized MOFs Gas-Sensitive Materials Combined With Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2105-2111. |
| [4] |
WU Zhi-yu1, XIN Zhi-ming2, JIANG Qun-ou1*, YU Yang1, WANG Zi-xuan1. Analysis of Dust Source and Dust Transport Path of a Typical Dust Event in Arid Area of Northwest China Based on HYSPLIT Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1862-1868. |
| [5] |
WANG Chao1, LIU Yan1*, XIA Zhen-zhen2, WANG Qiao1, DUAN Shuo1. Fast Evaluation of Freshness in Crayfish (Prokaryophyllus clarkii) Cased on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 156-161. |
| [6] |
LI Feng1, LIN Jing-jing2, YUN Jie3, ZHANG Shuai4*, WANG He5, ZHANG Hai4, TAO Zong-ming6. Analysis on Variation Characteristics of Air Pollution in Jining City Based on Lidars Networking Observation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3467-3475. |
| [7] |
ZHANG Fei1, 5，HUA Xia2*，YUAN Jia-ying3，YOU Fan1，YE Ren-cai4，DING Li4, ZHAO Jian-mei4. Determination of Thallium in Blood of Occupational Exposed Population by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry With High Matrix Introduction[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2870-2874. |
| [8] |
JIANG Cheng1, TANG Gui-qian2*, LI Qi-hua1*, LIU Bao-xian3, WANG Meng2, WANG Yue-si2. Vertical Profile of Aerosol in Spring in Beijing Based on Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 265-271. |
| [9] |
ZHANG Xu1, BAI Xue-bing1, WANG Xue-pei2, LI Xin-wu2, LI Zhi-gang3, ZHANG Xiao-shuan2, 4*. Prediction Model of TVB-N Concentration in Mutton Based on Near Infrared Characteristic Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3377-3384. |
| [10] |
OU Jin-ping1, LIU Hao-ran1*, ZHU Peng-cheng1, XU Heng1, WANG Zhuang2, TIAN Yuan1, LIU Guo-hua1, LI Qi-hua1. Characteristics of Aerosol Optical Properties and Their Potential Source in Hefei in Autumn[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3014-3020. |
| [11] |
CHEN Geng-yin1, ZHANG Qi-hang1, LIU Yu-zhu1, 2*, ZHANGCHENG Yuan-zhe1, CHEN Yu1, CHEN Guo-qing1, HAN Bo-yuan1, ABULIMITI Bumaliya3*. Online Detection of VOCs Based on LIBS and Raman Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2729-2733. |
| [12] |
ZHANG Shuai1, WANG Ming1, SHI Qi-bing1, YE Cong-lei1, LIU Dong2. Study on the Haze Process in Huainan City From October 2019 to March 2020 Observed by Raman-Mie Aerosol Lidar[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2484-2490. |
| [13] |
ZHENG Feng-xun1, ZHU Jia-yi2, HOU Wei-zhen3, LI Zheng-qiang3*. Effect Analysis of Using Different Polarization Quantities in Aerosol Retrieval From Satellite Observation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(07): 2212-2218. |
| [14] |
WANG Shu-tao, WANG Gui-chuan*, FAN Kun-kun, WU Xing, WANG Yu-tian. Inversion of Aerosol Optical Depth in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region Based on PSO Clustering Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3321-3327. |
| [15] |
CHEN Jie1, 2, 3, QIAN Xian-mei1, 3, LIU Qiang1, 3*, ZHENG Jian-jie1, 2, 3, ZHU Wen-yue1, 3, LI Xue-bin1, 3. Research on Optical Absorption Characteristics of Atmospheric Aerosols at 1 064 nm Wavelength[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 2989-2995. |
|
|
|
|
