|
|
|
|
|
|
Study on Mixed Prediction Model of Nitrate Concentration in Water Based on Ultraviolet Spectroscopy |
CHEN Ying1, HE Lei1, CUI Xing-ning1, HAN Shuai-tao1, ZHU Qi-guang2, ZHAI Ying-jian3, LI Shao-hua3 |
1. Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Test/Measurement Technology and Instrument, School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
2. Key Laboratory for Special Fiber and Fiber Sensor of Hebei Province, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004,China
3. Hebei Sailhero Environmental Protection Hi-tech Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, China |
|
|
Abstract High concentration of nitrates in water will not only cause water environment pollution but also pose a great threat to human health. The traditional methods for detecting nitrates have a long detection time and are complex to operate. In view of the difficulty in rapid on-line detection of nitrate nitrogen in water, a method combined a mixed prediction model with spectral integration was proposed to rapidly detect nitrate concentration in water based on ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy. The mixed prediction model is a model after data fusion of the dual wavelength prediction model established by low-concentration samples and the partial least-squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) prediction model based on the high concentration samples. According to the appropriate concentration gradient, 19 sets of nitrate nitrogen standard solution were equipped, and the spectral data of nitrate nitrogen samples of different concentrations were measured by experiment. First, Regression analysis was performed on all samples based on the dual wavelength method. Absorbance A was calculated for different experimental samples according to A=A220-2A275, where A220 and A275 were the absorbance of the samples at 220 and 275 nm. The values were linearly regressed to fit the predicted values of the sample concentrations. The results showed that when the sample concentration is small, the correlation is very good, and r is 0.997 4. The two-wavelength method is only suitable for the establishment of low-concentration samples prediction model with a serious nonlinear drift in the rising curve of the experimental samples concentration. For high-concentration samples, spectral overlap is severe and it is suitable for establishing nonlinear prediction models. Both support vector machine (SVM) and partial LS-SVM are suitable for nonlinear data modeling of small samples. The LS-SVM has a slightly higher prediction accuracy and a slightly faster operating speed. By performing full-wavelength spectral integration on all experimental samples and comparing the rate of change of the spectral integrals of adjacent samples, the critical concentration of the sample can be selected. The 4 mg·L-1 nitrate sample has the largest change rate before and after the integrated value, so it is appropriate to select 4 mg·L-1 as the the critical concentration value. The LS-SVM prediction model was established for experimental samples with concentrations higher than 4 mg·L-1. Cross-validation methods were used to select the appropriate parameters. The regularization parameter was γ=50, and the Gaussian kernel function width was σ2=0.36. The other samples were used to establish the dual-wavelength prediction model, and finally performed the data fusion of the two models, which formed the detection of nitrate from low concentration to high concentration. In order to verify the prediction accuracy of the mixed prediction model, the model of SVM, LS-SVM and PLS was established, and evaluated the model with mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (r), and root mean squared error (RMSE). The verification results showed that compared with other models, the correlation coefficient of the proposed mixed model regression is 0.999 86, which is increased by 1.8%, 1.6%, and 0.45% respectively, and the average absolute error between the predicted value and the true concentration is 2.55%, which decreased by 6.27%, 4.49%, and 1.01% respectively, and the root-mean-square error is 0.303, which is the smallest of the four prediction models. The relative error of SVM and LS-SVM is relatively high, and PLS model fluctuates up and down relatively. The relative error of mixed forecasting model is the most stable and remains at a low level, and the forecasting effect of mixed forecasting model is obviously better than that of other models. Compared with the measurement method in [5-7], this hybrid prediction method can simply and quickly measure the nitrate nitrogen concentration in water without reagents and no secondary pollution,andthe prediction accuracy is significantly improved compared with the model in [9]. Therefore, the proposed mixed model can correctly and quickly predict the concentration of nitrate in water, and provide an effective technical reference for on-line monitoring of nitrate concentration in water.
|
Received: 2018-03-30
Accepted: 2018-07-21
|
|
|
[1] ZHANG Cui-yun, ZHANG Sheng, LI Zheng-hong, et al(张翠云, 张 胜, 李政红, 等). Advances in Earth Science(地球科学进展), 2004, 19(2): 183.
[2] ZHANG Ya-li, ZHANG Yi-zhang, ZHANG Yuan, et al(张亚丽, 张依章, 张 远,等). China Environmental Science(中国环境科学), 2014, 34(1): 170.
[3] HUANG Jian-feng, ZHANG Yi-zhang, ZHANG Yuan, et al(黄剑峰, 张依章, 张 远,等). Research of Environmental Sciences(环境科学研究), 2012, 25(11): 1229.
[4] SUN Hao, GUO Hui, ZHAO Hui, et al(孙 浩, 郭 慧, 赵 辉,等). Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering(环境工程学报), 2016, 10(4): 2122.
[5] Horioka Y, Kurata S, Ito K. Bunseki Kagaku, 2014, 63(8): 657.
[6] Lorrana N N Nóbrega, Laiz de O Magalhóes, Alexandre Fonseca. Microchemical Journal, 2013, 110: 553.
[7] Manea F, Remes A, Radovan C,et al. Talanta, 2010, 83(1): 66.
[8] ZHAO You-quan, LI Xia, LIU Xiao, et al(赵友全, 李 霞, 刘 潇, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2016, 36(11): 3592.
[9] YANG Peng-cheng, DU Jun-lan, CHENG Chang-kuo(杨鹏程, 杜军兰, 程长阔). Marine Environmental Science(海洋环境科学), 2016, 35(6): 943.
[10] YUAN Yue, YAO Shuang-quan, WANG Shuang-fei(袁 月, 姚双全, 王双飞). Modern Chemical Industry(现代化工), 2016,(2): 176.
[11] WANG Shuai, ZHANG Yun-jia, WANG Xue-mei, et al(王 帅, 张云佳, 王雪梅,等). Computer Systems and Applications(计算机系统应用), 2017, 26(5): 232.
[12] ZOU Yong-jie, DUANMU Jing-shun, GAO Hai-long(邹永杰, 端木京顺, 高海龙). Computer Engineering and Design(计算机工程与设计), 2010, 31(10): 2290.
[13] Zhang C, Zhang H. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2016, 29(1): 76. |
[1] |
LI Xiao-dian1, TANG Nian1, ZHANG Man-jun1, SUN Dong-wei1, HE Shu-kai2, WANG Xian-zhong2, 3, ZENG Xiao-zhe2*, WANG Xing-hui2, LIU Xi-ya2. Infrared Spectral Characteristics and Mixing Ratio Detection Method of a New Environmentally Friendly Insulating Gas C5-PFK[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3794-3801. |
[2] |
YANG Wen-feng1, LIN De-hui1, CAO Yu2, QIAN Zi-ran1, LI Shao-long1, ZHU De-hua2, LI Guo1, ZHANG Sai1. Study on LIBS Online Monitoring of Aircraft Skin Laser Layered Paint Removal Based on PCA-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3891-3898. |
[3] |
WU Chao1, QIU Bo1*, PAN Zhi-ren1, LI Xiao-tong1, WANG Lin-qian1, CAO Guan-long1, KONG Xiao2. Application of Spectral and Metering Data Fusion Algorithm in Variable Star Classification[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1869-1874. |
[4] |
WANG Wen-jun1, SHA Yun-fei1, WANG Yang-zhong1, YU Jie1, LIU Tai-ang2, ZHANG Xu-feng3, MENG Xiang-zhou3, GE Jiong1*. Discriminating Flavor Styles via Data Fusion of NIR and EN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 133-137. |
[5] |
ZHANG Xue-fei1, DUAN Ning1, 2*, JIANG Lin-hua1, 2*, CHENG Wen2, YU Zhao-sheng3, LI Wei-dong2, ZHU Guang-bin4, XU Yan-li2. Study on Stability and Sensitivity of Deep Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry Detection System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3802-3810. |
[6] |
CHEN Feng-xia1, YANG Tian-wei2, LI Jie-qing1, LIU Hong-gao3, FAN Mao-pan1*, WANG Yuan-zhong4*. Identification of Boletus Species Based on Discriminant Analysis of Partial Least Squares and Random Forest Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(02): 549-554. |
[7] |
LU Li-min, SHI Bin, TANG Tian-yu, ZHAO Xian-hao, WEI Xiao-nan, TANG Yan-lin*. Spectral Analysis of Epinephrine Molecule Based on Density Functional Theory[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 248-252. |
[8] |
LIN Yan1, SU Jun-hong1*, TANG Yan-lin2, YANG Dan3. Ultraviolet Spectrum and Excitation Properties Calculations of Vitamin C Based on Density Functional Theory[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 304-309. |
[9] |
XU Hui-hua, SHI Dong-po*, WU Hao, YIN Xian-qing, ZHENG Yan-cheng, CHEN Wu, LI Geng. Influence of AEO-9 on Ultraviolet Absorbance Spectrum of TDBAC Reduced by β-CD[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3931-3935. |
[10] |
WANG Dong1,2, HAN Ping1,2*, WU Jing-zhu3*, ZHAO Li-li4, XU Heng4. Non-Destructive Identification of the Heat-Damaged Kernels of Waxy Corn Seeds Based on Near-Ultraviolet-Visible-Shortwave and Near-Infrared Multi-Spectral Imaging Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(09): 2696-2702. |
[11] |
HU Guo-qing1, 2, GUAN Ying-chun1, 2, 3*. Research Progress of Spectral Measurement on the On-Line Monitoring of Laser Processing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2343-2356. |
[12] |
LIU Tan1, 2, XU Tong-yu1, 2*, YU Feng-hua1, 2, YUAN Qing-yun1, 2, GUO Zhong-hui1, XU Bo1. Chlorophyll Content Estimation of Northeast Japonica Rice Based on Improved Feature Band Selection and Hybrid Integrated Modeling[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2556-2564. |
[13] |
ZOU Jin-ping1, ZHANG Shuai2, DONG Wen-tao2, ZHANG Hai-liang2*. Application of Hyperspectral Image to Detect the Content of Total Nitrogen in Fish Meat Volatile Base[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(08): 2586-2590. |
[14] |
ZHANG Jiao1, 2, WANG Yuan-zhong1, YANG Wei-ze1, ZHANG Jin-yu1*. Data Fusion of ATR-FTIR and UV-Vis Spectra to Identify the Origin of Polygonatum Kingianum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(05): 1410-1416. |
[15] |
YANG Lu-ze, LIU Miao*. Construction of a 3D-QSAR Model With Dual Spectral Effects and Its Application in Molecular Modification of Environmentally Friendly PBBs[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 430-434. |
|
|
|
|