光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of Methods for Estimating Soybean Leaf Area Index |
YANG fei1,2,ZHANG Bai1*,SONG Kai-shan1,WANG Zong-ming1,LIU Dian-wei1,LIU Huan-jun1,2,LI Fang1, LI Feng-xiu1,2,GUO Zhi-xing1,2,JIN Hua-an1,2 |
1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Changchun 130012, China 2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100039, China |
|
|
Abstract Leaf area index (LAI) is an important biophysical parameter,and is the critical variable in many ecology models,productivity models and carbon circulation study. Based on the field experiment data,an evaluation of soybean LAI retrieval methods was conducted using NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) and RVI (ratio vegetation index),principle component analysis (PCA) and neural network (NN) methods,and the estimate effects of three methods were compared.The results showed that the three methods have an ideal effect on the LAI estimation. R2 of validated model of vegetation indices,PCA,NN were 0.753 (NDVI),0.758 (RVI),0.883,0.899. PCA and NN methods were better with higher precision,and PCA method was the best,as its RMSE (0.202) was slower than the two vegetation indices (RMSEs of NDVI and RVI were 0.594 and 0.616) and NN (RMSE was 0.413) method. While the LAI was small,vegetation indices were obvious for removing the noise from soil and atmospheric effect and obtained the good evaluation result. PCA showed better effect for all LAI. LAI affected the estimating result of NN method moderately. As for the NN method,modeled LAI value and measured LAI regression formula slope was the nearest to 1 with R2 of 0.949,which showed a great potential for LAI estimating. As a whole, PCA and NN methods were the prior selection for LAI estimation,which should be attributed to the application of hyperspectral information of many bands.
|
Received: 2007-05-28
Accepted: 2007-09-08
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Bai
E-mail: zhangbai@neigae.ac.cn
|
|
[1] WANG Xi-qun, MA Lu-yi, JIA Zhong-kui, et al(王希群, 马履一, 贾忠奎, 等). Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志),2005,24(5):537. [2] Sellers P J,Dickinson R E,Randall D A, et al. Science,1997,275:502. [3] Cramer W,Kicklighter D W,Bondeau A. Global Change Biology, 1999, 5(suppl.1): 1. [4] Running S W,Nemani R R,Heinsch F A,et al. Bioscience,2004,54(6):547. [5] Chen J M, Cihlar J. Remote Sensing of Environment,1996,55: 153. [6] Turner P D,Warren B C,Robert E K. Remote Sensing of Environment,1999,70:52. [7] Chen J M,Pavlica G,Browna L,et al. Remote Sensing of Environment,2002,85:165. [8] Myneni R B,Nemani R R,Running S W. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,1997,35(66):1380. [9] Wythers K R,Reich P B,Turner D P. Tree Physiology,2003,23:1171. [10] WANG Xiu-zhen, HUANG Jing-feng, LI Yun-mei, et al(王秀珍, 黄敬峰, 李云梅,等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报),2004,8(1):81. [11] JI Hai-yan, WANG Peng-xin, YAN Tai-lai, et al(吉海彦, 王鹏新, 严泰来, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2007,27(3):514. [12] SONG Kai-shan, ZHANG Bai, WANG Zong-ming, et al(宋开山, 张 柏, 王宗明, 等). Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学),2006,39(6):1138. [13] Gong P,Pu R L,Biging G S,et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2003,41(6):1355. [14] Haboudane D,Miller J R,Pattey E,et al. Remote Sensing of Environment,2004,90(3):337. [15] Gupta R K,Vijayan D,Prasad T S. Advances in Space Research,2006,38(10):2212. [16] Gong P. International Journal of Remote Sensing,1999,20(1):111. [17] Bacour C,Baret F,Béal D,et al. Remote Sensing of Environment,2006,105:313. [18] Fang H,Liang S. Remote Sensing of Environment,2005,94:405. [19] PU Rui-liang, GONG Peng(浦瑞良, 宫 鹏). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Its Application(高光谱遥感及其应用),2000. [20] Pearson R L,Miller L D. In Proc 8th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment,ERIM,Ann Arbor,MI,1972. 1357. [21] Rouse J W,Jr Hasas R H,Schell J A,et al. Progress Report 1978-1,NTIS No. E73-10693,Remote Sensing Center,Texas A&M University,College Station,1973. 93. |
[1] |
LI Xin-ting, ZHANG Feng, FENG Jie*. Convolutional Neural Network Combined With Improved Spectral
Processing Method for Potato Disease Detection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 215-224. |
[2] |
LAN Yan1,WANG Wu1,XU Wen2,CHAI Qin-qin1*,LI Yu-rong1,ZHANG Xun2. Discrimination of Planting and Tissue-Cultured Anoectochilus Roxburghii Based on SMOTE and Inception-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 158-163. |
[3] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[4] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[5] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
[6] |
LI Wei1, TAN Feng2*, ZHANG Wei1, GAO Lu-si3, LI Jin-shan4. Application of Improved Random Frog Algorithm in Fast Identification of Soybean Varieties[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3763-3769. |
[7] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
[8] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[9] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[10] |
FANG Zheng, WANG Han-bo. Measurement of Plastic Film Thickness Based on X-Ray Absorption
Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3461-3468. |
[11] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[12] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[13] |
JIA Zong-chao1, WANG Zi-jian1, LI Xue-ying1, 2*, QIU Hui-min1, HOU Guang-li1, FAN Ping-ping1*. Marine Sediment Particle Size Classification Based on the Fusion of
Principal Component Analysis and Continuous Projection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3075-3080. |
[14] |
CHEN Jia-wei1, 2, ZHOU De-qiang1, 2*, CUI Chen-hao3, REN Zhi-jun1, ZUO Wen-juan1. Prediction Model of Farinograph Characteristics of Wheat Flour Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3089-3097. |
[15] |
XUE Fang-jia, YU Jie*, YIN Hang, XIA Qi-yu, SHI Jie-gen, HOU Di-bo, HUANG Ping-jie, ZHANG Guang-xin. A Time Series Double Threshold Method for Pollution Events Detection in Drinking Water Using Three-Dimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3081-3088. |
|
|
|
|