| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sensitivity Study of a Revised Leaf Photochemical Reflectance Index(PRI) |
| WU Chao-yang1,2,NIU Zheng1,TANG Quan1,2 |
1. The State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) defined as a normalized difference index using two narrow reflectance bands at 531 and 570 nm that are closely related to xanthophyll cycle pigment content has been successfully used to estimate leaf photosynthetic light use efficiency (LUE) across species which vary in water content and nitrogen concentration. Previous research demonstrated that a consistent relationship could be established between PRI and LUE calculated from gas exchange measurements at the leaf, small canopy, and full forest or crop canopy scales. However, a number of problems, such as the saturation of PRI when LUE exceeds 0.03 mol CO2 mol-1PPED(photosynthetic photon flux density) and disjunctive relationships of PRI and LUE in seasonal changes, still existed and need to be handled in order to evaluate LUE more accurately. A sensitivity study of a revised PRI with four leaf parameters was performed based on PROSPECT model in the present article to study the effects of different biochemical concentrations on leaf SR-PRI (simple ratio PRI). Sensitivity study proved that leaf SR-PRI is more sensitive to leaf mesophyll structure parameter (N) and chlorophyll a+b content (cab) than parameters of dry matter content (cm) and equivalent water thickness (cw), indicating that leaf mesophyll structure parameter (N) and chlorophyll a+b content (cab) should be especially considered when acquiring leaf SR-PRI. And changes in the two parameters would cause large variation in SR-PRI which would reduce the precision for estimating light use efficiency. Validation study of SR-PRI was carried out in the analysis and the results proved that SR-PRI can also be a feasible index of estimating LUE for four species of plants with correlation coefficients better than that of PRI and LUE. The advantage of SR-PRI compared to PRI is its much clearer physical meaning and its sensitivity to the changes in reflectance at 531 nm which serves as a core parameter to evaluate light use efficiency.
|
|
Received: 2007-05-10
Accepted: 2007-08-20
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WU Chao-yang
E-mail: hefery@163.com
|
|
[1] Adams J M, Faure H, Faure-Denard L. Nature, 1990, 348: 711.
[2] Demmig-Adams B, Adams B. Trends in Plant Science, 1994, (1): 21.
[3] Gamon J A, Serrano L, Surfus J S. Oecologia, 1997, 112(4): 492.
[4] Peňuelas J, Llusia J, Pinaol J, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1997, 18: 2863.
[5] Peňuelas J, Filella I, Gamon J A. New Phytologist, 1995, 131(3): 291.
[6] Guo J M, Trotter C M. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 27: 4677.
[7] Barton C V M, North P R J. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 78: 264.
[8] Nakaji T, Oguma H, Fujinuma Y. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 27: 493.
[9] Gamon J A, Peňuelas J, Field C B. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992, 41: 35.
[10] Jacquemoud S, Baret F. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1990, 34: 75.
[11] Sims D A, Gamon J A. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81: 337. |
| [1] |
LIANG Shou-zhen1, SUI Xue-yan1, WANG Meng1, WANG Fei1, HAN Dong-rui1, WANG Guo-liang1, LI Hong-zhong2, MA Wan-dong3. The Influence of Anthocyanin on Plant Optical Properties and Remote Sensing Estimation at the Scale of Leaf[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 275-282. |
| [2] |
LIANG Hao1, XU Wei-xin1*, DUAN Xu-hui1, ZHANG Juan2, DAI Na1, XIAO Qiang-zhi1, WANG Qi-yu1. Threshold Calibration of Key Parameters of Withered Grass Based on PROSAIL Model in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1144-1149. |
| [3] |
ZHAO Rui1, SONG Hai-yan1*, ZHAO Yao2, SU Qin1, LI Wei1, SUN Yi-shu1, CHEN Ying-min1. Research on Anti-Moisture Interference Soil Organic Matter ModelBased on Characteristic Wavelength Integration Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(03): 984-989. |
| [4] |
ZHOU Peng, WANG Wei-chao, YANG Wei*, JI Rong-hua, LI Min-zan. Effect of Soil Particle Size on Prediction of Soil Total Nitrogen Using Discrete Wavelength NIR Spectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(12): 3682-3687. |
| [5] |
LIU Hai-feng, MING Zhen-yang, WEN Ming-sheng, CUI Yan-qing, LIU Wei, YAO Ming-fa. Study on the Influence of Fuel Sensitivity on the Spectral Characteristics of Partially Premixed Combustion in Internal Combustion Engines[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 2999-3006. |
| [6] |
WAN Shun-kuan1, 2, LÜ Bo1, ZHANG Hong-ming1*, HE Liang1, FU Jia1, JI Hua-jian3, WANG Fu-di1, BIN Bin1, LI Yi-chao1, 2. Quick Measurement Method of Condensation Point of Diesel Based on Temperature-Compensation Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3111-3116. |
| [7] |
WANG Xin-hui1, 2, GONG Cai-lan1, 2*, HU Yong1, 2, LI Lan1, 2, HE Zhi-jie1, 2. Spectral Feature Construction and Sensitivity Analysis of Water Quality Parameters Remote Sensing Inversion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1880-1885. |
| [8] |
SU Wei1,2, WU Jia-yu1,2, WANG Xin-sheng1,2, XIE Zi-xuan1,2, ZHANG Ying1,2, TAO Wan-cheng1,2, JIN Tian1,2. Retrieving Corn Canopy Leaf Area Index Based on Sentinel-2 Image and PROSAIL Model Parameter Calibration[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1891-1897. |
| [9] |
WU Zhi-feng, LI Ling, DAI Cai-hong, WANG Yan-fei, XIE Yi-hang, CHENG Qiu-tong. Temperature and Humidity Influence in Field Spectroradiometer Measurement[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(05): 1639-1643. |
| [10] |
TONG Ang-xin, TANG Xiao-jun*, ZHANG Feng, WANG Bin. Species Identification of NaCl, NaOH and β-Phenylethylamine Based on Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry and Supervised Pattern Recognition Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 448-453. |
| [11] |
LIU Jun1, 2, 3, LIANG Shao-qing3, LI Yan-rong3, QIN Rong-rong3, ZHANG Tao-ran3, YANG Qiang3, DU Ling-tong4. Evaluation and Modifying of Multispectral Drought Severity Index[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3522-3529. |
| [12] |
SUN Yan-hua1, 2, FAN Yong-tao1, 2*. Correction of Temperature Influence in Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(06): 1690-1695. |
| [13] |
LI Ling, WU Zhi-feng, WANG Yan-fei, DAI Cai-hong. The Effects of Light Source Differences on Array Spectroradiometer Measurements and the Research of Ultraviolet Stray Light Correction[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(03): 837-841. |
| [14] |
ZHAO Heng-qian1,2, ZHANG Wen-bo2, ZHU Xiao-xin2, BI Yin-li2*, LI Yao3, ZHAO Xue-sheng2, JIN Qian4. Analysis on Susceptibility of Vegetation Canopy Spectra in Coal Mining Area to Land Reclamation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(06): 1858-1863. |
| [15] |
LI Ling, DAI Cai-hong, WU Zhi-feng, WANG Yan-fei. Laboratory Calibration and Temperature Research of Spectral Radiometric Instruments[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(06): 1965-1969. |
|
|
|
|
