|
|
|
|
|
|
| Simulated Lunar Soil Emissivity Spectrum Measurement Experiment and Accuracy Valuation |
| MA Ming1, 2, CHEN Sheng-bo1*, LU Peng1, XIAO Yang1，2, YANG Qian2 |
1. College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
2. College of Surveying and Exploration Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu Univerdity, Changchun 130118, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The minerals identification and component retrieval obtained from reflectance spectrum of lunar samples were greatly affected by the environment of lunar surface，and had been applied to approximately 5% of the lunar surface where lunar soil was immature. In contrast, the emission spectrum of lunar samples which is mainly composed of silicate minerals not only had obvious spectral characteristics, but also had little influence by the lunar’s atmosphere, temperature difference and vacuum. Thus a new approach to study the component and physical properties of lunar surface was offered. In the future, the emission spectrum of lunar samples collected by Chang’e 5 detector can be used to extract the compositional analysis of silicate minerals which are the main components of lunar crust. And it is important supplement to visible-near infrared spectrum in remote sensing study. However, the greatest challenge in the laboratory emissivity measurement is finding out the best measuring methods and instruments in order to obtain accurate and reliable spectrum data. In this study, using TurboFT 102F and Bruker VERTEX 70V, based on fourier infrared spectroscopy method, independent blackbody method and reflectivity method, the emission spectrums of simulated lunar soil were measured under natural laboratory, the nitrogen cold background and vacuum environment. The numerical accuracy of emissivity spectrums was analyzed and evaluated using the error propagation law or the thermal infrared emissivity spectra of Apollo samples. The study found that the reflectivity emission spectral characteristics were the most obvious and reflectivity emissivity spectral values in which measurement accuracy was the highest in the three emission spectrum measurement methods. Thus reflectivity method under sealed laboratory environment is the best choice for lunar sample emission spectrum measurement now before the simulate lunar vacuum environment is built. We hope that research and analysis results of the paper can provide a theoretical basis and technical reference for emissivity spectrum measurement of Chang’e 5 sample.
|
|
Received: 2017-09-05
Accepted: 2017-12-26
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CHEN Sheng-bo
E-mail: chensb@jlu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Stffler D, Bischoff A, Borchardt R, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1985, 90(S02).
[2] Swann G A, Bailey N G, Batson R M, et al. Preliminary Geologic Investigation of the Apollo 15 Landing Site，1972.
[3] Arvidson R, Drozd R, Guinness E, et al. Cosmic ray exposure ages of Apollo 17 Samples and the Age of Tycho. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings，1976, 7: 2817.
[4] Wang Z Z, Li Y, Zhang X H, et al. Science China Earth Sciences, 2010, 53(9): 1392.
[5] MA Ming, CHEN Sheng-bo, ZHOU Chao, et al(马 明, 陈圣波, 周 超, 等). Acta Petrologica Sinica(岩石学报), 2016, 32(1): 144.
[6] Donaldson Hanna K L, Wyatt M B, Thomas I R, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 2012, 117(E12).
[7] Lucey L, Korotev R L, Gillis J J, et al. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2006，60：83.
[8] Salisbury J W, Basu A, Fischer E M. Icarus, 1997, 130(1): 125.
[9] Conel J E. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1969, 74(6): 1614.
[10] Lyon R J P. Economic Geology, 1965, 60(4): 715.
[11] Salisbury J W, Walter L S. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1989, 94(B7): 9192.
[12] Thomas I R, Greenhagen B T, Bowles N E, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2012, 83(12): 124502.
[13] Newcombe M E, Brett A, Beckett J R, et al. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2017, 200: 330. |
| [1] |
LI Chun-qiang1, 2, GAO Yong-gang1, 2, XU Han-qiu1, 2*. Cross Comparison Between Landsat New Land Surface Temperature
Product and the Corresponding MODIS Product[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 940-948. |
| [2] |
FU Ming-hai1, 2, DAI Jing-jing1*, WANG Xian-guang3, HU Zheng-hua4, PENG Bo1, WAN Xin3, ZHANG Zhong-xue2, ZHAO Long-xian1, 2. A Study on the Thermal Infrared Spectroscopy Characteristics of the Skarn Minerals in Zhuxi Tungsten Deposit, Jiangxi Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 70-77. |
| [3] |
LIU Ting-yue1, DAI Jing-jing2*, TIAN Shu-fang1. A Neural Network Recognition Method for Garnets Subclass Based on Hyper Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1758-1763. |
| [4] |
LI Tian-zi2, LIU Shan-jun1*, SONG Liang3, WANG Dong1, HUANG Jian-wei4, YU Mo-li1. Experimental Study on the Effect of Observation Angle on Thermal Infrared Spectral Unmixing of Rock[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1769-1774. |
| [5] |
XU Ji-kun1, LI Tian-zi1, 2*, REN Yu-juan1. Experimental Study on the Effect of Roughness on the Inversion of SiO2 Content in Iron Ore by the Thermal Infrared Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(07): 2153-2158. |
| [6] |
XIA Jun1, ZHANG Fei2. A Study on Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Salt Content in Arid Area Based on Thermal Infrared Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1063-1069. |
| [7] |
CAI Ting-ni1, 2, LI Chun-lai1*, HE Zhi-ping3, REN Xin1, LIU Bin1, XU Rui3. Experimental Ground Validation of Spectral Quality of the Chang’E-5 Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(01): 257-262. |
| [8] |
HUANG Jian-wei1,2, LIU Shan-jun1,2*, XU Zhong-yin1,2, MA Chun-yan1,2, WU Li-xin3. Experimental Study on the Influence of the Radiation Background on the Variation in Thermal Infrared Radiance of Loaded Rock[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(01): 49-53. |
| [9] |
XIA Qing, HU Zhen-qi* . A Novel Method to Monitor Coal Fires Based on Multi-Spectral Landsat Images [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(08): 2712-2720. |
| [10] |
XU Han-qiu, HUANG Shao-lin. A Comparative Study on the Calibration Accuracy of Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensor Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(06): 1941-1948. |
|
|
|
|
