基于红外光谱的城市生活垃圾高值化利用深度分选

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)05-1353-08

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3390 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Due to the advantages of high speed and high accuracy, infrared spectra play a vital role in classification and identification. For municipal solid wastes, the application of infrared spectra mainly focuses on recyclable garbage such as plastics, neglecting the deep separation of the non-recyclable wastes. Based on the current “Quartering Method” of municipal solid wastes, the residual wastes contain various high-value potential ingredients that can be sorted into cellulose, vinyl-polymers, and woods. These ingredients have different constituents and structures, so they have different infrared spectra. Therefore, the useful constituents can be further separated from the residual wastes by combing their infrared spectra and the machine learning classification models. This study collected cellulose, vinyl-polymers, woods, and low-value residual wastes, and 72 groups of infrared spectra data were obtained. The influence of data preprocessing, dimension reduction and algorithms on the sorting models’ accuracy was investigated. Infrared spectra data were preprocessed by standard normal variate (SNV), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), derivative correction (DC), and smooth. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimension of the preprocessed data, and 72×8 and 72×5 datasets were obtained. Sorting models were built using probabilistic neural network (PNN), generalized regression neural network (GRNN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RDF) algorithms. As a result, the classification accuracy of 5-Dimensional data was superior to that of 8-Dimensional data, with the average accuracy increasing 2.4%~4.4%. Based on 5-Dimensional data, DC/Smooth preprocessing achieved the highest average accuracy of 96.5% among the three preprocessing methods. The average accuracy of the PNN model was 4.2%~6.5% higher than the other three sorting models, up to 98.1%. As for the four types of residual wastes, the sorting accuracy for vinyl polymers was 93.8%, it was over 95% for cellulose and woods, and it could be up to 100% for the low-value wastes. This study examined the possibility and scientific potentiality of the combination of infrared spectroscopy and machine learning to achieve the deep sorting of residual wastes, providing a theoretical basis for the future development of fast and accurate deep separation equipment of municipal solid wastes.

Key words：Infrared spectra; Machine learning; Residual wastes; Deep sorting; High-value utilization

Received: 2021-03-01 Accepted: 2021-07-27

ZTFLH:

O433.4

Corresponding Authors: TANG Fan, LU Qiang E-mail: tfan.108@gmail.com；qianglu@mail.ustc.edu.cn

Cite this article:

HU Bin,FU Hao,WANG Wen-bin, et al. Research on Deep Sorting Approach Based on Infrared Spectroscopy for High-Value Utilization of Municipal Solid Waste[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1353-1360.

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)05-1353-08 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2022/V42/I05/1353

[1] CHU Xiao-li, CHEN Pu, LI Jing-yan, et al(褚小立, 陈瀑, 李敬岩, 等). Journal of Instrumental Analysis(分析测试学报), 2020, 39(10): 1181.
[2] Bec Krzysztof B, Grabska Justyna, Huck Christian W. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2020, 1133: 150.
[3] LIU Wei-lai, JIA Si-liang, LIU Jing(刘维来, 贾思良, 刘静). Environmental Engineering(环境工程), 2019, 37(5): 293.
[4] LIU Yan-de, XIAO Huai-chun, DENG Qing, et al(刘燕德, 肖怀春, 邓清, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2019, 32(40): 202.
[5] PAN Xi, LIU Hui, WANG Hao, et al(潘曦, 刘辉, 王昊, 等). Journal of Instrumental Analysis(分析测试学报), 2020, 39(11): 1385.
[6] YIN Feng-fu, YAN Lei, HAN Qing-xin, et al(尹凤福, 闫磊, 韩清新, 等). Environmental Engineering(环境工程), 2017, 35(12): 134.
[7] ZHAO Dong-e, WU Rui, ZHAO Bao-guo, et al(赵冬娥, 吴瑞, 赵宝国, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(3): 921.
[8] YUAN Jing-zhu, ZHU Tong(袁惊柱, 朱彤). Energy of China(中国能源), 2018, 40(6): 16.
[9] QIAN Le, JIANG Li-qun, YUE Yuan-mao, et al(钱乐, 蒋丽群, 岳元茂, 等). CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2020, 71(12): 5376.
[10] LAN Mei-chen, SHEN Bo-xiong, WANG Jian-qiao, et al(兰美晨, 沈伯雄, 王建桥, 等). Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology(燃料化学学报), 2019, 47(11): 1313.
[11] Shafaghat H, Sirous-Rezaei P, Daud W M A. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016, 35: 268.
[12] ZHAO Yue-shu, XUE Xiao-ming, SONG Xiao-jiao, et al(赵阅书, 薛晓明, 宋小娇, 等). Journal of Forestry Engineering(林业工程学报), 2019, 4(5): 40.
[13] WEI Chen-jie, WANG Ji-fen, JI Jia-hua, et al(卫辰洁, 王继芬, 季佳华, 等). Chemical Research and Application(化学研究与应用), 2021, 33(2): 269.
[14] Saeys W, Do Trong N N, Van Beers R, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2019, 158: 110981.
[15] Porizka Pavel, Klus Jakub, Kepes E, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2018, 148: 65.