|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary Study on the Intertemporal Predictability of the Physiological Index of Early Rice Based on Hyperspectral |
ZHU Hai-jun1, FU Hong-yu1, 2, WANG Xue-hua1*, CUI Guo-xian1, 2*,SHI Ai-long1, XUE Wei-chun3 |
1. Agronomy College, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2. Ramie Research Institute, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3. Agriculture and Rural Bureau of Heshan District, Yiyang 413000, China |
|
|
Abstract Chlorophyll and leaf nitrogen content (LNC) are important indicators of crop growth. Real-time and accurate monitoring of Chlorophyll and LNC is helpful for field management and improvement of crop quality and yield. Currently, hyperspectral technology and empirical regression methods are widely used to construct crop biochemical parameter prediction models. However, there are still gaps in the research on predicting leaf biochemical parameters across periods. In this study, 120 leaf hyperspectral data, chlorophyll and LNC were obtained at five stages of early rice. Three different algorithms, namely, Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were used to establish inter-temporal prediction models for Chlorophyll and LNC in different growth stages. In addition, the intertemporal prediction model and the traditional non-intertemporal prediction model were evaluated. The results showed that the early rice chlorophyll inter-temporal prediction SVR model had the best prediction effect, with the inter-tillering prediction model having R2 of 0.54, the inter-booting prediction model has R2 of 0.36, the inter-heading prediction model has R2 of 0.30, inter-grouting prediction model has R2 of 0.55, and inter-mature prediction model has R2 of 0.74. The intertemporal prediction model of early rice leaf LNC was poor, and the LNC cannot be intertemporally predicted. Compared with the non-intertemporal prediction model, although the accuracy of the intertemporal prediction model has decreased, it can effectively overcome the shortcomings of poor universality of the empirical model, which is beneficial to realize the physiological characteristics of different growth stages of crops in the same life cycle. At the same time, we found that crop physiological indicators have inter-temporal predictability. This concept provides new ideas for the prediction of crop phenotype, internal crop quality and yield.
|
Received: 2020-12-04
Accepted: 2021-03-19
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Xue-hua, CUI Guo-xian
E-mail: 13873160151@163.com;627274845@qq.com
|
|
[1] Yao X, Huang Y, Shang G, et al. Remote Sensing,2015, 7:14939.
[2] LIN Yi, LIU Si-yuan, YAN Lei, et al(林 沂, 刘思远, 晏 磊, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020, 40(6): 1956.
[3] Hu H, Bai Y L, Yang L P, et al. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(6): 1317.
[4] Zhang Manyin, Li Mengjie, Liu Weiwei, et al. Spectroscopy Letters, 2019, 52(9): 483.
[5] Qiu Shanshan, Wang Jun, Gao Liping. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2014, 62(27): 6426.
[6] ZHANG Yin-jie, WANG Lei, BAI You-lu, et al(张银杰, 王 磊, 白由路, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2019, 39(9): 2829.
[7] Li Zhenhai, Jin Xiuliang, Yang guijun, et al. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(9): 1.
[8] YANG Fu-qin, FENG Hai-kuan, LI Zhen-hai, et al(杨福芹, 冯海宽, 李振海, 等). Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University·Nature Science Edition(山西农业大学学报·自然科学版), 2020, 40(5): 99.
[9] Katherine Meacham-Hensold, Christopher M Montes, Jin Wu, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 231: 111176.
[10] LIANG Xue-ying, FAN Feng-lei(梁雪映, 樊风雷). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(中国农业科技导报), 2019, 21(1): 51.
[11] Ghasemi J B, Tavakoli H. Analytical Methods, 2013, 5: 1863.
[12] Shao Y, Zhao C, Bao Y, et al. Food & Bioprocess Technology, 2012, 5(1): 100.
[13] Yang J, Du L, Gong W, et al. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13(1), 1. |
[1] |
WANG Cai-ling1,ZHANG Jing1,WANG Hong-wei2*, SONG Xiao-nan1, JI Tong3. A Hyperspectral Image Classification Model Based on Band Clustering and Multi-Scale Structure Feature Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 258-265. |
[2] |
GAO Hong-sheng1, GUO Zhi-qiang1*, ZENG Yun-liu2, DING Gang2, WANG Xiao-yao2, LI Li3. Early Classification and Detection of Kiwifruit Soft Rot Based on
Hyperspectral Image Band Fusion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 241-249. |
[3] |
WU Hu-lin1, DENG Xian-ming1*, ZHANG Tian-cai1, LI Zhong-sheng1, CEN Yi2, WANG Jia-hui1, XIONG Jie1, CHEN Zhi-hua1, LIN Mu-chun1. A Revised Target Detection Algorithm Based on Feature Separation Model of Target and Background for Hyperspectral Imagery[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 283-291. |
[4] |
CHU Bing-quan1, 2, LI Cheng-feng1, DING Li3, GUO Zheng-yan1, WANG Shi-yu1, SUN Wei-jie1, JIN Wei-yi1, HE Yong2*. Nondestructive and Rapid Determination of Carbohydrate and Protein in T. obliquus Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3732-3741. |
[5] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[6] |
HUANG You-ju1, TIAN Yi-chao2, 3*, ZHANG Qiang2, TAO Jin2, ZHANG Ya-li2, YANG Yong-wei2, LIN Jun-liang2. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Mangroves in Maowei Sea of Beibu Gulf Based on ZY-1-02D Satellite Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3906-3915. |
[7] |
ZHOU Bei-bei1, LI Heng-kai1*, LONG Bei-ping2. Variation Analysis of Spectral Characteristics of Reclaimed Vegetation in an Ionic Rare Earth Mining Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3946-3954. |
[8] |
YUAN Wei-dong1, 2, JU Hao2, JIANG Hong-zhe1, 2, LI Xing-peng2, ZHOU Hong-ping1, 2*, SUN Meng-meng1, 2. Classification of Different Maturity Stages of Camellia Oleifera Fruit
Using Hyperspectral Imaging Technique[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3419-3426. |
[9] |
FU Gen-shen1, LÜ Hai-yan1, YAN Li-peng1, HUANG Qing-feng1, CHENG Hai-feng2, WANG Xin-wen3, QIAN Wen-qi1, GAO Xiang4, TANG Xue-hai1*. A C/N Ratio Estimation Model of Camellia Oleifera Leaves Based on
Canopy Hyperspectral Characteristics[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3404-3411. |
[10] |
SHEN Ying, WU Pan, HUANG Feng*, GUO Cui-xia. Identification of Species and Concentration Measurement of Microalgae Based on Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3629-3636. |
[11] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[12] |
QIAN Rui1, XU Wei-heng2, 3 , 4*, HUANG Shao-dong2, WANG Lei-guang2, 3, 4, LU Ning2, OU Guang-long1. Tea Plantations Extraction Based on GF-5 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Imagery in the Mountainous Area[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3591-3598. |
[13] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[14] |
YANG Lei1, 2, 3, ZHOU Jin-song1, 2, 3, JING Juan-juan1, 2, 3, NIE Bo-yang1, 3*. Non-Uniformity Correction Method for Splicing Hyperspectral Imager Based on Overlapping Field of View[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3582-3590. |
[15] |
SUN Lin1, BI Wei-hong1, LIU Tong1, WU Jia-qing1, ZHANG Bao-jun1, FU Guang-wei1, JIN Wa1, WANG Bing2, FU Xing-hu1*. Identification Algorithm of Green Algae Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3637-3643. |
|
|
|
|