|
|
|
|
|
|
Discrimination of Human, Dog and Rabbit Blood Using Raman Spectroscopy |
DONG Jia-lin1, HONG Ming-jian1, 3*, ZHENG Xiang-quan2, 3, XU Yi2, 3 |
1. School of Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
3. National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science of Micro/Nano-Device and System Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China |
|
|
Abstract The identification of multiple species blood is particularly important for entry-exit inspection and quarantine, forensic investigation and wildlife protection. The traditional methods often destroy blood samples and make further analysis of samples impossible. Raman Spectroscopy is a vibrational spectrum, which can obtain the information of molecular vibration and rotation so as to analyze the chemical composition of the material. It provides the possibility of non-destructive blood identification. Currently, there are several methods of blood identification based on Raman spectroscopy, but these methods use the linear classification model, ignoring nonlinear relationship between the spectrum and sample, and lead to the bad performance of the model. Moreover, the small sample number of each species usually results in the under-fitting the model. Therefore, this paper set up a classification model for the nonlinear relationship using the support vector machine to identify Raman spectra of blood, overcame the shortcoming of the linear classification model which emphasizes the linear characteristic of the spectrum in the training, and absorbed the nonlinear relationship in the Raman spectrum effectively, realizing the three classification of human, dog and rabbit blood. There are a total of 326 samples which were measured by Ocean Raman spectrometer with excitation wavelength of 785 nm, including 110 humans, 116 dogs and 100 rabbits. Savitzky-Golay smoothing filter, weighted least squares baseline correction, and vector normalization were used to preprocess them. The 2/3 of these samples were used as calibration set for training and the remaining samples were used as test set for blind testing. Experimental results showed that the classification accuracy of proposed model for the calibration set and the blind test were 100% and 93.52%, and outperformed the existing linear classification models. This indicates that proposed classification model has good application prospects and research value.
|
Received: 2016-10-18
Accepted: 2017-03-10
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HONG Ming-jian
E-mail: hmj@cqu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Mclaughlin G, Doty K C, Lednev I K. Forensic Science International, 2014, 238(5): 91.
[2] WANG Xiao-bin, WU Rui-mei, LIU Mu-hua, et al(王晓彬,吴瑞梅,刘木华,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2014,34(6): 1566.
[3] LU Ming-zi, GUO Yan-jun, ZHAO Lian, et al(卢明子,郭延军,赵 莲,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2014,34(2): 439.
[4] Virkler K, Lednev I K. Analytical Chemistry, 2009, 81(18): 7773.
[5] Mclaughlin G, Doty K C, Lednev I K, et al. Anal. Chem.,2014, 86:11628.
[6] Mclaughlin G, Doty K C, Lednev I K. Forensic Science International, 2014, 238(5): 91.
[7] Fujihara J, Fujita Y, Yamamoto T, et al. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2016. 1.
[8] CHEN Da, YAN Meng-yu, LI Qi-feng, et al(陈 达,闫孟雨,李奇峰,等). Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering(纳米技术与精密工程), 2015, 13(3): 226.
[9] Li J, Deng H, Li P, et al. Applied Physics B, 2015, 120(2): 207.
[10] Huang G, Ruan X, Chen X, et al. Analytical Methods, 2014, 6(9): 2900.
[11] Premasiri W R, Lee J C, Ziegler L D. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2012, 116(31): 9376.
[12] WANG Gui-wen, PENG Li-xin, SHEN Wei-dong, et al(王桂文,彭立新,申卫东,等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2011(6): 276.
[13] Skrobot V L, Castro E V R, Pereira R C C, et al. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 21(6): 5.
[14] Wong T T. Pattern Recognition, 2015, 48(9): 2839.
[15] Guerbai Y, Chibani Y, Hadjadji B. Pattern Recognition, 2015, 48(1): 103. |
[1] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[2] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[3] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
[4] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[5] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[6] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
[7] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
[8] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
[9] |
LÜ Shi-lei1, 2, 3, WANG Hong-wei1, LI Zhen1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Xu1, ZHAO Jing1. Hyperspectral Identification Model of Cantonese Tangerine Peel Based on BWO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2894-2901. |
[10] |
WANG Jun-jie1, YUAN Xi-ping2, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, ZHAO Hai-long1. Hyperspectral Identification Method of Typical Sedimentary Rocks in Lufeng Dinosaur Valley[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2855-2861. |
[11] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[12] |
LI Hao-dong1, 2, LI Ju-zi1*, CHEN Yan-lin1, HUANG Yu-jing1, Andy Hsitien Shen1*. Establishing Support Vector Machine SVM Recognition Model to Identify Jadeite Origin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2252-2257. |
[13] |
LI Bin, HAN Zhao-yang, WANG Qiu, SUN Zhao-xiang, LIU Yan-de*. Research on Bruise Level Detection of Loquat Based on Hyperspectral
Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1792-1799. |
[14] |
PAN Zhao-jie1, SUN Gen-yun1, 2*, ZHANG Ai-zhu1, FU Hang1, WANG Xin-wei3, REN Guang-wei3. Tobacco Disease Detection Model Based on Band Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1023-1029. |
[15] |
WANG Yu-ye1, 2, LI Hai-bin1, 2, JIANG Bo-zhou1, 2, GE Mei-lan1, 2, CHEN Tu-nan3, FENG Hua3, WU Bin4ZHU Jun-feng4, XU De-gang1, 2, YAO Jian-quan1, 2. Terahertz Spectroscopic Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Ischemia in Rats[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 788-794. |
|
|
|
|