|
|
|
|
|
|
| Atmospheric Correction of Airborne Hyperspectral Image Based on Fruit Fly-Powell Optimization Algorithm |
| PAN Cen-cen1, YAN Qing-wu1, DING Jian-wei2, ZHANG Qian-qian1, TAN Kun1* |
1. School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2. The Second Surveying and Mapping Institute of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050037, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Atmospheric correction of airborne hyperspectral is the basis of quantitative retrieval of hyperspectral remote sensing. However, the comparison analysis of aerial and field synchronous data was relatively rare, and it was mainly studied in this paper that the different atmospheric correction methods are compared with the fieldwork spectral of Hyspex hyperspectral remote sensing data. Based on the existing several atmospheric correction methods, a novel atmospheric correction method was proposed in this paper: Firstly, we used Fruit fly-Powell optimization algorithm, spectral performance parameters, that is, shift at the center wavelength (σλ) and Full Width of Half Maximum (σFWHM) are retrieved, so the original spectral is recalibrated. We used the spectral of recalibration, and MODerate spectral resolution atmospheric TRANsmittance algorithm (MODTRAN) was applied for atmospheric correction. Ground synchronous measured reflectance data of five types of typical objects was used, and it was then evaluated the accuracy of the method proposed in this paper and other five generally used atmospheric correction methods: QUick Atmospheric Correction (QUAC), Empirical Line Correction (ELC), Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum(6S) atmospheric correction, Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercubes (FLAASH) correction and MODTRAN atmospheric correction. Determination coefficient (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) were introduced to evaluate the accuracy of the atmospheric correction results. Accuracy evaluation results showed that the proposed MODTRAN optimized based on Fruit fly-Powell algorithm in this paper was the best, with R2 above 80%, and RMSE within 15%; the results of MODTRAN，FLAASH and 6S atmospheric correction methods were closer to the proposed new method, and also the accuracy of the three atmospheric correction results were relatively stable, with R2 above 70%, RMSE around 20%. Moreover, QUAC and ELC methods were instable. It is concluded that Fruit fly-Powell algorithm is effective and feasible to estimate σλ and σFWHM, and thus the accuracy of the novel atmospheric correction method is better than the existing various atmospheric correction methods.
|
|
Received: 2016-01-06
Accepted: 2016-08-17
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
TAN Kun
E-mail: tankuncu@gmail.com
|
|
[1] Goetz A F. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113：S5.
[2] Brook A, Dor E B. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(6): 1543.
[3] Griffin M K, Burke H-H K. Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 2003, 14(1): 29.
[4] Milton E J, Schaepman M E, Anderson K, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113: S92.
[5] Gao B C, Montes M J, Davis C O, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113: S17.
[6] Kruse F. Proceedings of the Summaries of 13th JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, Jet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA, F, 2004.
[7] Liu Y, Wang T, Ma L, et al. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(6): 2630.
[8] Wang T, Yan G, Ren H, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(11): 3924.
[9] Richter R, Schl?pfer D, Müller A. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(5): 1772.
[10] Gao B C, Montes M J, Davis C O. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 90(4): 424.
[11] Green R O, Pavri B E, Chrien T G. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(6): 1194.
[12] Vermote E F, Tanré D, Deuzé J L, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35(3): 675.
[13] Liang S, Fang H. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2004, 1(2): 112. |
| [1] |
YE Fa-wang, WANG Jian-gang*, QIU Jun-ting, ZHANG Chuan. A Geological Application Oriented Comparison Research on Different Atmospheric Correction Methods for Airborne CASI-SASI Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(09): 2677-2685. |
| [2] |
SONG Ting1, 2, GONG Shao-qi3, LIU Jun-zhi4, 5*, GU Zheng-fan2, SHI Jun-zhe2, WU Wei2. Performance Assessment of Atmospheric Correction for Multispectral Data of GF-4 on Inland Case Ⅱ Turbid Water[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(04): 1191-1197. |
| [3] |
XU Kai-jian1, 2, ZENG Hong-da3, 4, ZHU Xiao-bo1, 2, TIAN Qing-jiu1*. Evaluation of Five Commonly Used Atmospheric Correction Algorithms for Multi-Temporal Aboveground Forest Carbon Storage Estimation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(11): 3493-3498. |
| [4] |
XIE Dong-hai1, 3, CHEN Tian-hai2*, WU Yu2, YU Jie1, 3, GUO Hong2, ZHONG Ruo-fei1, 3. Atmospheric Correction for HJ-1 CCD Data Coupling with Aerosol Models of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(05): 1284-1290. |
| [5] |
QIU Yu-bao1, SHI Li-juan2, 4, SHI Jian-cheng2, ZHAO Shao-jie3 . Atmospheric Influences Analysis on the Satellite Passive Microwave Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(02): 310-315. |
| [6] |
GUO Hong1, 2, GU Xing-fa1*, XIE Yong1, YU Tao1, GAO Hai-liang1, WEI Xiang-qin1, LIU Qi-yue1 . Evaluation of Four Dark Object Atmospheric Correction Methods Based on ZY-3 CCD Data [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(08): 2203-2207. |
| [7] |
WANG Zhong-ting1，2, WANG Hong-mei3, LI Qing1, ZHAO Shao-hua1, LI Shen-shen2, CHEN Liang-fu2 . A Quickly Atmospheric Correction Method for HJ-1 CCD with Deep Blue Algorithm [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(03): 729-734. |
| [8] |
XU Hua1, 2, LI Zheng-qiang1, 2, YIN Qiu3, GU Xing-fa1, 2* . Influence of Measurement Errors of Radiation in NIR Bands on Water Atmospheric Correction [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(07): 1781-1785. |
| [9] |
YANG Lei1, PAN Zhi-qiang1，FU Qiao-yan1, HAN Qi-jin1, SUN Ke2, ZHANG Xue-wen1, WANG Ai-chun1 . Research on the Atmospheric Correction for ZY-3 MUX Image [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(07): 1903-1907. |
| [10] |
ZENG Qun1，2, ZHAO Yue2, TIAN Li-qiao3*, CHEN Xiao-ling3, 4 . Evaluation on the Atmospheric Correction Methods for Water Color Remote Sensing by Using HJ-1A/1B CCD Image-Taking Poyang Lake in China as a Case[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 33(05): 1320-1326. |
| [11] |
XU Hua1,2,3, GU Xing-fa1,2*, LI Zheng-qiang1,2，LI Li1,2，CHEN Xing-feng1,2 . Atmospheric Correction Method for HJ-1 CCD Imagery over Waters Based on Radiative Transfer Model [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 31(10): 2798-2803. |
| [12] |
ZHOU Li-guo1, MA Wei-chun1*, GU Wan-hua1, HUAI Hong-yan2 . Atmospheric Correction of HJ-1 CCD Data for Water Imagery Based on Dark Object Model [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 31(08): 2238-2242. |
| [13] |
ZHAO Shao-hua1,2, QIN Qi-ming2, ZHANG Feng1, WANG Qiao1, YAO Yun-jun3, YOU Lin2，JIANG Hong-bo2， CUI Rong-bo2, YAO Yian-juan1 . Research on Using a Mono-Window Algorithm for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from Chinese Satellite for Environment and Natural Disaster Monitoring(HJ-1B) Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 31(06): 1552-1556. |
| [14] |
ZHENG Qiu-gen1，QUAN Wen-ting3 . Application of Dark Pixels Atmospheric Correction Algorithm to Hyperion Imageries [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 30(10): 2710-2713. |
| [15] |
WANG Tian-xing, YAN Guang-jian*, REN Hua-zhong, MU Xi-han . Retrieval of Spectral Characteristics of Hyperspectral Sensor and Retrieval of Reflectance Spectra [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 30(10): 2714-2718. |
|
|
|
|
