|
|
|
|
|
|
A Probe into the Contents and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Available Heavy Metals in the Soil of Shell Ridge Island of Yellow River Delta with ICP-OES Method |
YANG Hong-jun1, SUN Jing-kuan1*, SONG Ai-yun1, QU Fan-zhu1, DONG Lin-shui1, FU Zhan-yong2 |
1. Binzhou University,Key Laboratory of Ecological Environment of Yellow River Delta in Shandong Province, Binzhou 256603, China
2. Forest College, Shandong Agricultural University,Tai’an 271018, China |
|
|
Abstract With the application of ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry), available heavy metals (i.e. As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Pb, Se, Zn) in the soil of Shell Ridge Island of Yellow River Delta are rapidly determined. The spatial distribution characteristics in the soil of Shell Ridge Island are studied, and the distribution rules and influence factors of available heavy metals in soil are analyzed. As indicated in the conclusion, for the contents of nine available heavy metals in the soil samples from Shell Ridge Island of Yellow River Delta, all elements, except for Cadmium (Cd) and Mercury (Hg), fall far below the level 1 background content as specified in the National Environmental Quality Standard for Soils. In this sense, the overall soil of Shell Ridge Island is at clean level. As indicated in the horizontal distribution, due to more human disturbances at the back side of sea and less seawater leaching, the contents of seven available heavy metals (As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, Zn) are significantly higher than that at the seaward side, and there are significant variations (p≤0.05). As indicated in the analysis of longitudinal soil profile, due to the influences of soil mechanical composition, artificial sand borrowing, terrain and water flow direction, the average concentration value of available heavy metals rise with the increased proportion of soil particles (particle size <0.5 mm) in the profile sample whereas declines with the increased proportion of soil particles (particle size >0.5 mm). There is a downward movement trend of the heavy metals in the soil of Shell Ridge Island, and the maximum value of most available heavy metal contents are located at every layer under the surface layer. However, there are no obvious changes in the overall contents of heavy metals in every layer. Such heavy metals as As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb and Zn in the soil of Shell Ridge Island may roughly have the same source, yet different from the source of Hg, Mn and Se. Synoptically speaking, the soil environment in the Shell Ridge Island of Yellow River Delta is not subject to obvious external pollution, while the available heavy metals in the soil of Shell Ridge Island mainly come from the parent material filter feeding bivalve for concentration of heavy metals in seawater, soil particles for the absorption of heavy metals in the environment during weathering process and the migration & transformation of heavy metal pollutants from external industrial regions.
|
Received: 2015-09-17
Accepted: 2016-02-19
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
SUN Jing-kuan
E-mail: sunjingkuan@126.com
|
|
[1] Adrees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, et al. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2015, 119: 186.
[2] Duan X W, Zhang G L, Rong L, et al. Catena, 2015, 135: 59.
[3] Fang Xiaobo, Shi Jian, Liao Xinfeng, et al. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150413.009.
[4] Li Yimeng, Ma Jianhua, Liu Dexin, et al. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(3): 1037.
[5] Liu Qing, Wang Jing, Shi Yanxi, et al. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(3): 90.
[6] Ure A M. The Science of the Total Environment, 1996, 178: 3.
[7] Gulz P A, Gupta S K, Schulin R. Plant and Soil, 2005, 272(1-2): 337.
[8] Zhang Guangsheng, Xu Wenbin, Li Junxiang, et al. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(3): 522.
[9] Zhang Hui, Fu Qiang, Zhao Yinghui. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 20(2): 165.
[10] Wang Zuwei, Zhang Hui, Zhang Wenju. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2005, 36(1): 101.
[11] Zhong Xiaolan, Zhou Shenglu, Li Jiangtao, et al. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(2): 254.
[12] Chen Shouli, Sun Bo. Soils, 2008, 40(1): 66.
[13] Zhou Wenlin, Li Renying, Yue Haiyan, et al. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010, 29(3): 451.
[14] Shi Rongguang, Zhou Qiwen, Zhao Yujie, et al. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011, 48(4):751.
[15] Tong Qianming. Land & Resources Herald, 2011, 5: 58.
[16] Zhu Weihuang, Yang Yuangen, Bi Hua, et al. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2004, 24(3): 239.
[17] Bai J H, Xiao R, Zhang K J, et al. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, (450-451): 244.
[18] Liu Qing, Zhao Ximei, Xie Wenjun, et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013, 33(11): 3133.
[19] Xu Ren, Yang Ying, Li Zhien. Marine Science Bulletin, 2007, 26(5), 117.
[20] Sun Z G, Mou X J, Tong C, et al. Catena, 2015, 126: 43.
[21] Song H L, Sun Z G. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21: 14174. |
[1] |
XU Tian1, 2, LI Jing1, 2, LIU Zhen-hua1, 2*. Remote Sensing Inversion of Soil Manganese in Nanchuan District, Chongqing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 69-75. |
[2] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
[3] |
HAN Xue1, 2, LIU Hai1, 2, LIU Jia-wei3, WU Ming-kai1, 2*. Rapid Identification of Inorganic Elements in Understory Soils in
Different Regions of Guizhou Province by X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 225-229. |
[4] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
[5] |
MENG Shan1, 2, LI Xin-guo1, 2*. Estimation of Surface Soil Organic Carbon Content in Lakeside Oasis Based on Hyperspectral Wavelet Energy Feature Vector[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3853-3861. |
[6] |
LI Qi-chen1, 2, LI Min-zan1, 2*, YANG Wei2, 3, SUN Hong2, 3, ZHANG Yao1, 3. Quantitative Analysis of Water-Soluble Phosphorous Based on Raman
Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3871-3876. |
[7] |
XIE Peng, WANG Zheng-hai*, XIAO Bei, CAO Hai-ling, HUANG Yi, SU Wen-lin. Hyperspectral Quantitative Inversion of Soil Selenium Content Based on sCARS-PSO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3599-3606. |
[8] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[9] |
AN Bai-song1, 2, WANG Xue-mei1, 2*, HUANG Xiao-yu1, 2, KAWUQIATI Bai-shan1, 2. Hyperspectral Estimation of Soil Lead Content Based on Random Frog Band Selection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3302-3309. |
[10] |
DENG Yun1, 2, NIU Zhao-wen1, 2, FENG Qi-yao1, 2, WANG Yu1, 2*. A Novel Hyperspectral Prediction Model of Organic Matter in Red Soil Based on Improved Temporal Convolutional Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2942-2951. |
[11] |
CAI Hai-hui1, ZHOU Ling2, SHI Zhou3, JI Wen-jun4, LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui5*. Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Matter in Jujube Orchard
in Southern Xinjiang Using CARS-BPNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2568-2573. |
[12] |
XIA Chen-zhen1, 2, 3, JIANG Yan-yan4, ZHANG Xing-yu1, 2, 3, SHA Ye5, CUI Shuai1, 2, 3, MI Guo-hua5, GAO Qiang1, 2, 3, ZHANG Yue1, 2, 3*. Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Maize Field of Black Soil Area Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2617-2626. |
[13] |
ZHANG Zi-hao1, GUO Fei3, 4, WU Kun-ze1, YANG Xin-yu2, XU Zhen1*. Performance Evaluation of the Deep Forest 2021 (DF21) Model in
Retrieving Soil Cadmium Concentration Using Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2638-2643. |
[14] |
ZHANG Xia1, WANG Wei-hao1, 2*, SUN Wei-chao1, DING Song-tao1, 2, WANG Yi-bo1, 2. Soil Zn Content Inversion by Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data and Considering Soil Types[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2019-2026. |
[15] |
HU Meng-ying1, 2, ZHANG Peng-peng1, 2, LIU Bin1, 2, DU Xue-miao1, 2, ZHANG Ling-huo1, 2, XU Jin-li1, 2*, BAI Jin-feng1, 2. Determination of Si, Al, Fe, K in Soil by High Pressure Pelletised Sample and Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2174-2180. |
|
|
|
|