光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement of Soil Total Nitrogen Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with RCA and SPA |
FANG Xiao-rong1, ZHANG Hai-liang2, 3, HUANG Ling-xia4, HE Yong2* |
1. Jinhua Polytechnic, Jinhua 321017, China 2. College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China 3. School of Railway Tracks and Transportation, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China 4. College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
Abstract Visible near infrared spectra technology was adopted to detect soil total nitrogen content. 394 soil samples were collected from Wencheng, Zhejiang province to be used for calibration model (n=263) and independent prediction set (n=131). Raw spectra and wavelength-reduced spectra with five different pretreatment methods (SG smoothing, SNV, MSC, 1st-D and 2nd-D) were compared to determine the optimal wavelength range and pretreatment method for analysis. The results with 5 different pretreatment methods were not improved compared to that both of full spectra PLS model and wavelength reduction spectra model. Spectral variable selection is an important strategy in spectrum modeling analysis, because it tends to parsimonious data representation and can lead to multivariate models with better performance. In order to simply calibration models, the wavelength variables selected by two different variable selection methods (i.e. regression coefficient analysis (RCA) and successive projections algorithm (SPA) were proposed to be the inputs of calibration methods of PLS, MLR and LS-SVM models separately. These calibration models were also compared to select the best model to predict soil TN. In total, 9 different models were built and the best results indicated that PLS, MLR and LS-SVM obtained the highest precision with determination coefficient of prediction R2pre=0.81, RMSEP=0.0031 and RPD=2.26 based on wavelength variables selected by RCA (0.0002) and SPA as inputs of models. SPA-MLR model and other three models based on 7 sensitive variables selected by RC using 0.0002 regression coefficient threshold value obtained the best result with R2pre, RMSEP and RPD as 0.81, 0.0031 and 2.26. This prediction accuracy is classied to be very good. For all the models, it could be concluded that RCA and SPA could be very useful ways to selected sensitive wavelengths, and the selected wavelengths were effective to estimate soil TN. It is recommended to adopt SPA variable selection or RCA variable selection method with both linear and nonlinear calibration models for measurement of the soil TN using Vis-NIR spectroscopy technology, and wavelengths selection could be very useful to reduce collinearity and redundancies of spectra.
|
Received: 2014-06-25
Accepted: 2014-10-08
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HE Yong
E-mail: yhe@zju.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Vohland M, Ludwig M, Thiele-Bruhn S, et al. Geoderma, 2014, 223-225: 88. [2] Debaene G, Niedzwiecki J, Pecio A, et al. Geoderma, 2014, 214-215: 114. [3] Nocita M, Stevens A, Toth G, et al. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 68: 337. [4] Kuang B Y, Mouazen A M. Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 114(3): 249. [5] SHEN Zhang-quan, LU Bi-hui, SHAN Ying-jie, et al(沈掌泉,卢必慧,单英杰,等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2013, 33(07): 1775. [6] Shi T Z, Cui L J, Wang J J, et al. Plant and Soil, 2013, 366(1-2): 363. [7] Marques J, Siqueira D S, Camargo L A, et al. Geoderma, 2014, 219-220: 63. [8] YANG Mei-hua, ZHAO Xiao-min, FANG Qian, et al(杨梅花,赵小敏,方 倩, 等). Scientia Agricutcura Sinica(中国农业科学), 2014, 47(12): 2374. [9] BAO Shi-dan(鲍士旦). Soil Agrichemical Analysis(土壤农化分析). Beijing: China Agriculture Press(北京: 中国农业出版社), 1999. 30. [10] Liu F, He Y, Wang L, et al. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2011, 4(8): 1331. [11] Wu D, Shi H, Wang S, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2012, 726: 57. [12] Shao Y N, Zhao C J, Bao Y D, et al. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2012, 5(1): 100. |
[1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
[2] |
ZHENG Pei-chao, YIN Yi-tong, WANG Jin-mei*, ZHOU Chun-yan, ZHANG Li, ZENG Jin-rui, LÜ Qiang. Study on the Method of Detecting Phosphate Ions in Water Based on
Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrum Combined With SPA-ELM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 82-87. |
[3] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[4] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[5] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
[6] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
[7] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
[8] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[9] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
[10] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[11] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[12] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[13] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
[14] |
HUANG Hua1, LIU Ya2, KUERBANGULI·Dulikun1, ZENG Fan-lin1, MAYIRAN·Maimaiti1, AWAGULI·Maimaiti1, MAIDINUERHAN·Aizezi1, GUO Jun-xian3*. Ensemble Learning Model Incorporating Fractional Differential and
PIMP-RF Algorithm to Predict Soluble Solids Content of Apples
During Maturing Period[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3059-3066. |
[15] |
JIA Zong-chao1, WANG Zi-jian1, LI Xue-ying1, 2*, QIU Hui-min1, HOU Guang-li1, FAN Ping-ping1*. Marine Sediment Particle Size Classification Based on the Fusion of
Principal Component Analysis and Continuous Projection Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3075-3080. |
|
|
|
|