| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| On-Orbit Radiometric Calibration Accuracy of FY-3A MERSI Thermal Infrared Channel |
| XU Na1, 2, HU Xiu-qing1, 2*, CHEN Lin1, 2, ZHANG Yong1, 2 , HU Ju-yang1, 2, SUN Ling1, 2 |
1. National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
2. Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environmental Satellites, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Accurate satellite radiance measurements are significant for data assimilations and quantitative retrieval applications. In the present paper, radiometric calibration accuracy of FungYun-3A (FY-3A) Medium Resolution Spectral Imager (MERSI) thermal infrared (TIR) channel was evaluated based on simultaneous nadir observation (SNO) intercalibration method. Hyperspectral and high-quality measurements of METOP-A/IASI were used as reference. Assessment uncertainty from intercalibration method was also investigated by examining the relation between BT bias against four main collocation factors, i.e. observation time difference, view geometric difference related to zenith angles and azimuth angles, and scene spatial homogeneity. It was indicated that the BT bias is evenly distributed across the collocation variables with no significant linear relationship in MERSI IR channel. Among the four collocation factors, the scene spatial homogeneity may be the most important factor with the uncertainty less than 2% of BT bias. Statistical analysis of monitoring biases during one and a half years indicates that the brightness temperature measured by MERSI is much warmer than that of IASI. The annual mean bias (MERSI-IASI) in 2012 is (3.18±0.34)K. Monthly averaged BT biases show a little seasonal variation character, and fluctuation range is less than 0.8K. To further verify the reliability, our evaluation result was also compared with the synchronous experiment results at Dunhuang and Qinghai Lake sites, which showed excellent agreement. Preliminary analysis indicates that there are two reasons leading to the warm bias. One is the overestimation of blackbody emissivity, and the other is probably the incorrect spectral respond function which has shifted to window spectral. Considering the variation character of BT biases, SRF error seems to be the dominant factor.
|
|
Received: 2013-07-09
Accepted: 2013-10-25
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
HU Xiu-qing
E-mail: huxq@cma.gov.cn
|
|
[1] YANG Jun, DONG Chao-hua, LU Nai-meng, et al(杨 军, 董超华, 卢乃锰，等). Meteorological Sinica(气象学报), 2009, 67(4): 501.
[2] Goldberg M D. Proc. SPIE, Atmospheric and Environmental Remote Sensing Data Processing and Utilization Ⅲ: Readiness for GEOSS, 2007, 6684: 668402.
[3] Chander G. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(3): 1056.
[4] Gunshor Mathew M, Timothy J Schmit, W Paul Menzel, et al. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2009, 26: 746.
[5] Hewison T J, Wu X, Yu F, et al. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2013，51(3): 1160.
[6] Xu Na, Hu Xiu-qing, Chen Lin, et al. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 16(5): 939.
[7] Zhang Y, Gunshor M M. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(3): 1231.
[8] Hu Xiu-qing, Xu Na, Weng Fu-zhong, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(10): 5008.
[9] Wang L. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2009, 26: 1843.
[10] Yu F, Wu X. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(3): 1187.
[11] Hewison T J. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(3): 1171.
[12] Hewison T J, Muller J. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(3): 1182.
[13] Yoshihiko T. Meteorological Satellite Center Technical Note, 2008, 50: 1.
[14] Aumann H H, Broberg S, Elliott D, et al. J. Geophys. Res., 2006, 111, doi: 10.1029/2005JD006822.
[15] Blumstein D, Tournier B, Cayla F R, et al. Proc. SPIE, Atmospheric and Environment Remote Sensing Data Processing and Utilization III: Readiness for GEOSS, 2007, 6684: 66840H.
[16] Wang L, Goldberg M, Wu X, et al. J. Geophys. Res., 2011, 116: D11111.
[17] HU Xiu-qing, ZHANG Li-yang, ZHENG Zhao-jun, et al(胡秀清，张里阳，郑照君，等). Optical and Precision Engineering(光学精密工程), 2010, 18(9): 1972. |
| [1] |
YE Wen-chao1, LUO Shui-yang1, LI Jin-hao1, LI Zhao-rong1, FAN Zhi-wen1, XU Hai-tao1, ZHAO Jing1, LAN Yu-bin1, 2, DENG Hai-dong1*, LONG Yong-bing1, 2, 3*. Research on Classification Method of Hybrid Rice Seeds Based on the Fusion of Near-Infrared Spectra and Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2935-2941. |
| [2] |
ZHANG Fu-jie, SHI Lei, LI Li-xia*, ZHAO Hao-ran, ZHU Yin-long. Study on Nondestructive Identification of Panax Notoginseng Powder Quality Grade Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2255-2261. |
| [3] |
LI Peng-cheng1, 2, LIU Han1, 2, ZHAO Long-lian1, 2, LI Jun-hui1, 2*. Key Parameters for Maize Leaf Moisture Measurement Using NIR Camera With Filters Based on Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3184-3188. |
| [4] |
YANG Tian-hang 1, 2, 3, GU Ming-jian1, 2*, HU Xiu-qing4, WU Chun-qiang4, QI Cheng-li4，SHAO Chun-yuan1, 2. Tropospheric 3D Winds Measurement Based on Cross-Platform Infrared Hyperspectral Observation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(04): 1131-1137. |
| [5] |
FAN Nai-yun, LIU Gui-shan*, ZHANG Jing-jing, ZHANG Chong, YUAN Rui-rui, BAN Jing-jing. Hyperspectral Model Optimization for Protein of Tan Mutton Based on Box-Behnken[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(03): 918-923. |
| [6] |
WANG Cheng1, YU Hang1, YAO Wei-rong1, CHENG Yu-liang1, GUO Ya-hui1, QIAN He1, TAN Zhi-qiang2, XIE Yun-fei1*. A Study on the Screening of Anti-Inflammatory Drug Diclofenac Sodium in Dietary Supplements by Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 592-598. |
| [7] |
LÜ Meng-qi1, SONG Yu-jie4, WENG Hai-yong1, 3, SUN Da-wei1, 3, DONG Xiao-ya2, FANG Hui1, 3, CEN Hai-yan1, 3*. Effect of Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Scanning Speed on Prediction of Water Content in Arabidopsis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3508-3514. |
| [8] |
SHAO Yuan-yuan1, 2, WANG Yong-xian1, XUAN Guan-tao1, 3*, GAO Zong-mei4, LIU Yi1, HAN Xiang1, HU Zhi-chao2*. Hyperspectral Imaging Technique for Estimating the Shelf-Life of Kiwifruits[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(06): 1940-1946. |
| [9] |
ZHANG Jing-jing1, LIU Gui-shan1*, REN Ying-chun1, SU Wen-hao1, KANG Ning-bo2, MA Chao3. Rapid Detection of Freshness in Tan-Lamb Mutton Based on Hyperspectral Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(06): 1909-1914. |
| [10] |
GUO Jun-jie1, 2, 3, YAO Zhi-gang2, 3, 4*, HAN Zhi-gang2, 3, ZHAO Zeng-liang2, 3, YAN Wei1. Inter-Calibration for TG-2/MAI Visible Band Based on Metop-B/GOME-2[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(01): 56-64. |
| [11] |
YANG Yu-qing1, 2, ZHANG Tian-tian1,2, LI Jun-hui1, 2*, LU Meng-yao1, 2, LIU Hui1, 2, ZHAO Long-lian1, 2, ZHANG Ye-hui1, 2. Water Imaging of Living Corn Leaves Based on Near-Infrared Hysperspectral Imaging[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(12): 3743-3747. |
| [12] |
ZHOU Ke1, 2, 3, 5, LIU Li4*, YU Tao1, 3, GU Xing-fa1, 3, ZHENG Feng-bin5, ZANG Wen-qian1, 3. Sensitivity Analysis of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors For GF-1/WFV Sensor Cross-Calibration[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(12): 3809-3813. |
| [13] |
YE Hui, LI Xiao-li, YU Ke-qiang, XIA Yi-hua, ZHANG Chu, HE Yong*. Application of Hyperspectral Technology for the Determination of the Solid Concentration of the Anaerobic Digestion[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(12): 3833-3838. |
| [14] |
FAN Yang-yang, QIU Zheng-jun*, CHEN Jian, WU Xiang, HE Yong . Identification of Varieties of Dried Red Jujubes with Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(03): 836-840. |
| [15] |
LIU Lei*, SUN Xue-jin, GAO Tai-chang . Research on Cloud Phase Detemination Using Infrared Emissivity Spectrum Data (1): Cloud Phase Determination [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(12): 3885-3894. |
|
|
|
|
