光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
An Improved Physical Model to Correct Topographic Effects in Remotely Sensed Imagery |
ZHANG Zhao-ming1, 2, 3, HE Guo-jin1, LIU Ding-sheng1, WANG Xiao-qin4, JIANG Hong4 |
1. Center for Earth Observation and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2. Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4. Spatial Information Research Centre, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, China |
|
|
Abstract Topographic correction for remotely sensed imagery is an important preprocessing step in order to improve the retrieval accuracy of land surface spectral reflectance in mountainous area. Various kinds of topographic correction models have been proposed in the literature. Each model has its advantages and limitations. In consideration of the limitations of the topographic correction models in the literature, an improved Shepherd topographic correction model is proposed in this paper. Diffuse irradiance is an essential factor in the physically based topographic correction model. While in the Shepherd model (originally proposed by Shepherd et al. in 2003), accuracy of the method to compute the diffuse irradiance is relatively low; therefore, the accuracy of the land surface spectral reflectance retrieved with the Shepherd model is impacted. In order to improve the accuracy of diffuse irradiance, hence the accuracy of land surface spectral reflectance, a different method (named the Perez model), is used to obtain the diffuse irradiance with higher accuracy in the improved Shepherd model. Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery acquired on July 12th 2006, over the mountainous areas in the north of Beijing city, was employed to retrieve land surface spectral reflectance with the improved Shepherd topographic correction model and 6S (Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum) atmospheric radiative transfer model. Correction results were tested with three different methods. Testing result shows that the improved Shepherd topographic correction model can achieve a good correction result and is better than Shepherd and C topographic correction model. What is more, this improved model is physically based and can be applied to all kinds of optical satellite imagery.
|
Received: 2009-07-06
Accepted: 2009-10-08
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Zhao-ming
E-mail: zmzhang@ceode.ac.cn, zming_1980@163.com
|
|
[1] Teillet P M, Guindon B, Goodenough D G. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1982, 8(2): 84. [2] Smith J A, Lin T L, Ranson K J. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1980, 46(9): 1183. [3] Duguay C R, LeDrew E F. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1992, 58(5): 551. [4] Holben B N, Justice C O. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1980, 46(9): 1191. [5] GAO Yong-nian, ZHANG Wan-chang(高永年, 张万昌). Geographical Research(地理研究), 2008, 27(2): 467. [6] Shepherd J D, Dymond J R. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003, 24(17): 3503. [7] Noorian A M, Moradi I, Kamali G A. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33: 1406. [8] Berk A, Bernstein L S, Anderson G P, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 65: 367. [9] Vermote E, Tanré D, Deuzé J L, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35: 675. [10] YUAN Jin-guo, NIU Zheng, WANG Xi-ping(袁金国, 牛 铮, 王锡平). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2009, 29(5): 1181. [11] Sandmeier S, Itten K I. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35(3): 708. [12] Perez R, Ineichen P, Seals R, et al. Solar Energy, 1990, 44(5): 271. [13] Dymond J R, Shepherd J D. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999, 37(5): 2618. [14] Itten K I, Meyer P. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1993, 31(4): 764. [15] Riano D, Chuvieco E, Salas J, et al. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(5): 1056. [16] HUANG Wei, ZHANG Liang-pei, LI Ping-xiang(黄 微, 张良培, 李平湘). Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica(测绘学报), 2006, 35(3): 285.
|
[1] |
MA Yuan, LI Ri-hao, ZHANG Wei-feng*. Research on the Training Samples Selection for Spectral Reflectance
Reconstruction Based on Improved Weighted Euclidean Distance[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3924-3929. |
[2] |
ZHU Zhi-cheng1, WU Yong-feng2*, MA Jun-cheng2, JI Lin2, LIU Bin-hui3*, JIN Hai-liang1*. Response of Winter Wheat Canopy Spectra to Chlorophyll Changes Under Water Stress Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3524-3534. |
[3] |
TAO Jing-zhe1, 3, SONG De-rui1, 3, SONG Chuan-ming2, WANG Xiang-hai1, 2*. Multi-Band Remote Sensing Image Sharpening: A Survey[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 2999-3008. |
[4] |
WU Zhi-yu1, XIN Zhi-ming2, JIANG Qun-ou1*, YU Yang1, WANG Zi-xuan1. Analysis of Dust Source and Dust Transport Path of a Typical Dust Event in Arid Area of Northwest China Based on HYSPLIT Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1862-1868. |
[5] |
DAI Shuo1, XIA Qing1*, ZHANG Han1, HE Ting-ting2, ZHENG Qiong1, XING Xue-min1, LI Chong3. Constructing of Tidal Flat Extraction Index in Coastal Zones Using Sentinel-2 Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1888-1894. |
[6] |
SUN Xi-tong, FU Yun*, HAN Chun-xiao, FAN Yu-hua, WANG Tian-shu. An Inversion Method for Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Global Ocean Through Convolutional Neural Networks[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 608-613. |
[7] |
HAI Jing-pu1, 2, GUO Ling-hua1, 2*, QI Yu-ying1, 2, LIU Guo-dong1, 2. Research on the Spectral Prediction Model of Gravure Spot Color Scale Based on Density[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 31-36. |
[8] |
GAO Feng1, 2, 3, JIANG Qun-ou1, 2, 3*, XIN Zhi-ming4, XIAO Hui-jie1, 2, LÜ Ke-xin1, QIAO Zhi1. Extraction Method of Oasis Shelterbelt Systems Based on Remote-Sensing Images ——A Case Study of Dengkou County[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3896-3905. |
[9] |
LIU Hong-jun1, NIU Teng1, YU Qiang1*, SU Kai2, YANG Lin-zhe1, LIU Wei1, WANG Hui-yuan1. Inversion and Estimation of Heavy Metal Element Content in Peach Forest Soil in Pinggu District of Beijing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3552-3558. |
[10] |
WANG Yang-ping1, 2, HAN Shu-mei1*, YANG Jing-yu1, 2, DANG Jian-wu1, 2, ZHANG Zhan-ping1. Improved YOLOv4 Remote Sensing Image Detection Method of Ground Objects Along Railway[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3275-3282. |
[11] |
JIANG Wan-li1, 2, SHI Jun-sheng1, 2*, JI Ming-jiang1, 2. Establishment of Visible and NIR Spectral Reflectance Database of Plant Leaves and Principal Component Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2366-2373. |
[12] |
WANG Xiao-xuan1, LU Xiao-ping1*, LI Guo-qing2, WANG Jun2, YANG Zen-an1, ZHOU Yu-shi1, FENG Zhi-li1. Combining the Red Edge-Near Infrared Vegetation Indexes of DEM to
Extract Urban Vegetation Information[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2284-2289. |
[13] |
JIANG Dan-yang1, WANG Zhi-feng1*, GAO Cheng1, 2, LI Chang-jun1. Spectral Reflectance Reconstruction With Color Constancy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1044-1048. |
[14] |
LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1*, FENG Chun-hui1, LIU Wei-yang1, JI Wen-jun2, WANG Nan3. Inversion of Soil Organic Matter Fraction in Southern Xinjiang by Visible-Near-Infrared and Mid-Infrared Spectra[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3069-3076. |
[15] |
LI Fu-hao, LI Chang-jun*. Spectral Reflectance Reconstruction Based on Camera Raw RGB Using Weighted Third-Order Polynomial and Wiener Estimation[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(10): 3281-3285. |
|
|
|
|