|
|
|
|
|
|
Research on Model Transfer Method of Organic Matter Content
Estimation of Different Soils Using VNIR Spectroscopy |
HU Guo-tian1, 2, 3, SHANG Hui-wei1, 2, 3, TAN Rui-hong1, XU Xiang-hu1, PAN Wei-dong1 |
1. College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Internet of Things, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangling 712100, China
3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Information Perception and Intelligent Service, Yangling 712100, China
|
|
|
Abstract Soil properties can be estimated accurately and quickly using visible and near-infrared (VNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. However, a key problem is the lack of universal nutrient content calibration models for different soils. To improve the universality of the soil organic matter (SOM) content calibration model for different types of soils and the speed of online detection of the SOM in farmland, sixty-six samples of soil from M107B in the United States were used to establish the SOM content. Calibration model using the particle swarm optimization-based least squares support vector machines (PSO-LSSVM) method using VNIR spectroscopy. Then this calibration model predicted 23 samples of the validation set from M107B. The results gave the coefficient of determination (R2) and the ratio of standard deviation to root mean square error of prediction (RPD) of 0.859 and 2.660, respectively. Subsequently, we predicted the SOM content of the validation set, including 20 samples from N116B, by the PSO-LSSVM calibration model of all 89 soil samples from M107B. The results showed decreases in the R2-value (0.562) and RPD (0.952). These decreases in R2 and RPD values by 34.6% and 64.2%, respectively, indicated that the prediction accuracy was significantly decreased when the PSO-LSSVM calibration model of SOM content in M107B was directly used to predict SOM content in N116B. The PSO-LSSVM calibration model established by the calibration set, a combination of some soil samples from N116B and all 89 samples from M107B was also used to predict SOM content of the previous validation set from N116B and gave the R2 values that were more than 0.80 and RPD values that were more than 2.0 when the number of soil samples from N116B was added over 35. In addition, R2 increased from 0.562 to 0.811. RPD increased from 0.952 to 2.274 when the number of soil samples from N116B added to the calibration set increased from 0 to 50. The results showed that calibration model accuracy could be effectively improved by adding some soil samples from N116B to M107B calibration set when predicting SOM content in N116B. The prediction performance of models was stable, whereas the prediction accuracy met practical requirements when the number of soil samples from N116B added to the calibration set was more than 50. In addition, the calibration model of SOM in M107B was successfully transferred to the soil in N116B, and the samples in N116B with large differences in organic matter content or spectral curve from samples in M107B are preferred to adding to the calibration set because this method can effectively avoid the mutation of model transfer performance. In conclusion, the results provided a method to improve the SOM prediction accuracy of N116B soil using the SOM calibration model of M107B soil. Furthermore, the results provided a new, economical and feasible model transfer method for real-time estimating of SOM content in farmland based on VNIR. The results also provided an effective solution to improve the universality of the SOM content calibration model for different soil types.
|
Received: 2021-08-07
Accepted: 2022-03-03
|
|
|
[1] Ji W J, Rossel R A V, Shi Z. European Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 66(3): 555.
[2] Wang J Z, Tiyip T, Ding J L, et al. Journal of Spectroscopy, 2017,(1/2): 1.
[3] Tan Y, Jiang Q G, Yu L F, et al. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 5895.
[4] Brown D J, Shepherd K D, Walsh M G, et al. Geoderma, 2005, 132(3): 273.
[5] Krishnan P, Alexander J D, Butler B J, et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(6): 1282.
[6] CHEN Hao-yu, YANG Guang, HAN Xue-ying, et al(陈昊宇, 杨 光, 韩雪莹, 等). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(中国农业科技导报), 2021, 23(5): 132.
[7] JI Wen-jun, SHI Zhou, ZHOU Qing, et al(纪文君, 史 舟, 周 清, 等). Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2012, 31(3): 277.
[8] Padarian J, Minasny B, McBratney A B. Geoderma,2019, 340: 279.
[9] Panchuk V, Kirsanov D, Oleneva E, et al. Talanta,2017, 170: 457.
[10] Zheng K Y, Zhang X, Iqbal J, et al. Journal of Chemometrics, 2014, 28(10): 773.
[11] Dong X G, Dong J, Li Y L, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019, 156: 669.
[12] Vitaly P, Dmitry K, Ekaterina O, et al. Talanta, 2017, 170: 457.
[13] USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agricultural Handbook 296, Washington, D. C. 2006, 332-334, 375-377.
[14] LIU Yan-de, WANG Jun-zheng, JIANG Xiao-gang, et al(刘燕德, 王军政, 姜小刚, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2021, 41(7): 2064.
[15] ZHANG Wen, WU Zhi-bin, XU Jiu-ping(张 雯, 吴志彬, 徐玖平). Control and Decision(控制与决策), 2022, 37(7): 1837.
|
[1] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[2] |
CAI Jian-rong1, 2, HUANG Chu-jun1, MA Li-xin1, ZHAI Li-xiang1, GUO Zhi-ming1, 3*. Hand-Held Visible/Near Infrared Nondestructive Detection System for Soluble Solid Content in Mandarin by 1D-CNN Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2792-2798. |
[3] |
TANG Ruo-han1, 2, LI Xiu-hua1, 2*, LÜ Xue-gang1, 2, ZHANG Mu-qing2, 3, YAO Wei2, 3. Transmittance Vis-NIR Spectroscopy for Detecting Fibre Content of
Living Sugarcane[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2419-2425. |
[4] |
CAI Hai-hui1, ZHOU Ling2, SHI Zhou3, JI Wen-jun4, LUO De-fang1, PENG Jie1, FENG Chun-hui5*. Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Matter in Jujube Orchard
in Southern Xinjiang Using CARS-BPNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2568-2573. |
[5] |
XIA Chen-zhen1, 2, 3, JIANG Yan-yan4, ZHANG Xing-yu1, 2, 3, SHA Ye5, CUI Shuai1, 2, 3, MI Guo-hua5, GAO Qiang1, 2, 3, ZHANG Yue1, 2, 3*. Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Maize Field of Black Soil Area Based on UAV Hyperspectral Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2617-2626. |
[6] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
[7] |
LIN Jing-tao, XIN Chen-xing, LI Yan*. Spectral Characteristics of “Trapiche-Like Sapphire” From ChangLe, Shandong Province[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1199-1204. |
[8] |
MAO Xiao-tian1, CHEN Chang2, YIN Zuo-wei1*, WANG Zi-min1. Spectra Characterization of Cr-Grossular (Tsavorite) With “Frogspawn” Color Zoning From Canada[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(02): 520-525. |
[9] |
BAO Pei-jin1, CHEN Quan-li1, 2*, WU Yan-han1, LI Xuan1, ZHAO An-di1. Spectroscopy Characteristics of Emerald From Swat Valley, Pakistan[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 213-219. |
[10] |
FU Peng-you1, 2, WEN Yue2, ZHANG Yu-ke3, LI Ling-qiao1*, YANG Hui-hua1, 2*. Deep Learning Modelling and Model Transfer for Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Quantitative Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 310-319. |
[11] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, 3, WANG Xin-yue2, CUI Xia-hua2, CAO Wei-hua2, ZHANG Xiao-dong1*, ZHANG Ya-kun2. Classification of Qianxi Tomatoes by Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With GMO-SVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3291-3297. |
[12] |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1,2, YANG Li1,2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1,2, CUI Tao1,2, HE Xian-tao1,2, DU Zhao-hui1,2. Prediction of Organic Matter Content in Sandy Fluvo-Aquic Soil by
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2924-2930. |
[13] |
LI Rui1, LI Bo1*, WANG Xue-wen1, LIU Tao1, LI Lian-jie1,2, FAN Shu-xiang2. A Classification Method of Coal and Gangue Based on XGBoost and
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(09): 2947-2955. |
[14] |
ZHONG Xiang-jun1, 2, YANG Li1, 2*, ZHANG Dong-xing1, 2, CUI Tao1, 2, HE Xian-tao1, 2, DU Zhao-hui1, 2. Effect of Different Particle Sizes on the Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Content by Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(08): 2542-2550. |
[15] |
LI Xue-ying1, 2, LI Zong-min3*, CHEN Guang-yuan4, QIU Hui-min2, HOU Guang-li2, FAN Ping-ping2*. Prediction of Tidal Flat Sediment Moisture Content Based on Wavelet Transform[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1156-1161. |
|
|
|
|