甲烷/氧气层流同轴射流扩散火焰OH<sup>*</sup>自由基的数值研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2018)03-0685-07

Abstract
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (3739 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract OH^* is one of the major excited radicals in flame. The chemiluminescence information is generally applied in combustion diagnostics to indicate the flame structure, strain rate, equivalence ratio, heat release rate, etc. In this paper, the numerical study on OH^* radicals was conducted in the laminar methane/oxygen co-flowing jet diffusion flames. The detailed GRI 3.0 mechanism combined with OH^* radicals reaction mechanism was used in the numerical model. Based on the two-dimensional OH^* distributions, the pathways of OH^* formation in different area were analyzed. The effects of oxygen-fuel equivalence ratio and coaxial nozzle structure on OH^* intensity and distribution were also discussed. The simulation results were consistent with the experiment results, indicating that the numerical model can effectively describe the two-dimensional OH* distributions. The results show that there are two different types of OH^* distribution areas, and the OH^* radicals in these two areas are formed respectively through the reactions CH+O₂=OH^*+CO and H+O+M=OH^*+M. The flame structure can be indicated according to the distribution area of OH^* radicals. With increasing the oxygen-fuel equivalence ratio, the distribution area of OH^* radicals gradually expands to the downstream of flame. The distinctions of OH* distribution can be used to characterize the combustion condition. If OH^* radicals only distribute over the upstream of the flame and appear discrete in shape, the flame is under the oxygen-deficient combustion. If OH^* radicals distribution appears as a ring shape, the flame is under the oxygen-enriched combustion. Under the same oxygen flow rate, the size of annular channel has a significant impact on the mole fraction of OH^*. Reducing the size of annular channel can enhance the mixture of fuel and oxygen as well as improve the radiation intensity of the OH^* chemiluminescence, which makes the flame diagnosis more convenient.

Key words：Methane; Diffusion flame; OH^* radicals; Numerical simulation

Received: 2017-04-12 Accepted: 2017-08-26

ZTFLH:

O433.5

Corresponding Authors: GONG Yan, YU Guang-suo E-mail: gsyu@ecust.edu.cn；yangong@ecust.edu.cn

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2018)03-0685-07 OR https://www.gpxygpfx.com/EN/Y2018/V38/I03/685

[1] Gaydon A G. The Spectrocopy of Flames. London: Chapman and Hall, 1974.
[2] GUI Xin-yang, Aymeric Alliot, YANG Bin, et al(桂欣扬, Aymeric Alliot, 杨斌, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2016, 36(11): 3492.
[3] Escudero F, Fuentes A, Demarco R, et al. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2015, 73: 101.
[4] Prabasena B, Rder M, Kathrotia T, et al. Applied Physics B, 2012, 107(3): 561.
[5] Zhang T, Guo Q, Liang Q, et al. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(9): 5503.
[6] Giassi D, Cao S, Bennett B A V, et al. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 167: 198.
[7] Kojima J, Ikeda Y, Nakajima T. Combustion and Flame, 2005, 140(1-2): 34.
[8] Kathrotia T, Riedel U, Seipel A, et al. Applied Physics B, 2012, 107(3): 571.
[9] Leo M D, Saveliev A, Kennedy L A, et al. Combustion and Flame, 2007, 149(4): 435.
[10] Hossain Akter, Nakamura Yuji. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(1): 162.
[11] Panoutsos C S, Hardalupas Y, Taylor A M K P. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(2): 273.
[12] Walsh K T, Long M B, Tanoff M A, et al. Symposium on Combustion, 1998, 27(1): 615.
[13] Luque J, Jeffries J B, Smith G P, et al. Combustion and Flame, 2000, 122(1-2): 172.
[14] Bozkurt M, Fikri M, Schulz C. Applied Physics B, 2012, 107(3): 515.
[15] AnsysInc. ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 Theory Guide. 2009.
[16] Smith G P, Golden D M, Frenklach M, et al. http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/.
[17] Kathrotia T, Fikri M, Bozkurt M, et al. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(7): 1261.
[18] Tamura M, Berg P A, Harrington J E. Combustion and Flame，1998, 114(3-4): 502.
[19] Walsh K T, Fielding J, Smooke M D, et al. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1): 357.
[20] Bennett B A V, Cheng Z X, Pitz R W, et al. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2008, 12(3): 497.
[21] SONG Xu-dong, GUO Qing-hua, ZHANG Ting, et al(宋旭东, 郭庆华, 张婷, 等). Proceedings of the CSEE(中国电机工程学报), 2013, 33(35): 50.