光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
A New Vegetation Index Infusing Visible-Infrared Spectral Absorption Feature for Natural Grassland FAPAR Retrieval |
LI Zhe1, 2, GUO Xu-dong1*, GU Chun2, ZHAO Jing3 |
1. Key Laboratory of Land Use, Chinese Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100035, China 2. Chengdu Capitastrum Affairs Center, Chengdu 610074, China 3. Sichuan University of Media and Communications, Chengdu 611745, China |
|
|
Abstract Considering the close relationship between spectral absorption features of visible-near infrared and “Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation(FAPAR)”, the “automatic recognition method of hyperspectral curve’s characteristic absorption peak” and “quantization method of spectral absorption characteristic parameters” were used to extract the hyperspectral absorption characteristic parameters which are sensitive to FAPAR. Referring to mathematical form of vegetation index, visible-near infrared spectral absorption characteristic parameters were used to replace spectral reflectance and create a new vegetation index to estimate FAPAR of vegetation. The data from 2014 and 2015 on typical natural grassland community canopy in the middle and eastern Inner Mongolia was chosen to build and verify the model of estimating FAPAR. The results showed that new vegetation index “SAI-VI” effectively raised the FAPAR estimating accuracy in the middle and low vegetation coverage areas. Compared with other seven different types of visible-near infrared vegetation index, it has a higher correlation with the value of FAPAR(the largest correlation coefficient is 0.801). The FAPAR prediction index model which takes “SAI-VI” as variable has higher precision and better stability(the determination coefficients of modeling and testing are the highest and both are above 0.75, the “Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)” and “Average Error Coefficient (MEC)” are the minimum). The research also showed that the new vegetation index “SAI-VI” infusing visible-infrared spectral absorption feature highlights the difference between visible spectral and near infrared spectral absorption characteristic parameters. While comparing with single spectral absorption characteristic parameter, “SAI-VI” can depress the influence of soil and enhance the sensitivity to the changes of FAPAR. “SAI-VI” also included the information of hyperspectral absorption characteristic parameters which are sensitive to FAPAR and expressed more detailed information of FAPAR while comparing with original spectral reflectance. “SAI-VI” can be used as a new parameter in inversion of vegetation canopy FAPAR, to some extent it could remedy defect of vegetation index method in estimating FAPAR.
|
Received: 2015-11-12
Accepted: 2016-05-18
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
GUO Xu-dong
E-mail: sam9560@vip.sina.com
|
|
[1] Steinberg D C, Goetz S J, Hyer E J. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(7): 1818. [2] Gong P, Pu R, Biging G S, et al, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(6): 1355. [3] DONG Tai-feng, MENG Ji-hua, WU Bing-fang(董泰锋, 蒙继华, 吴炳方). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2012,32(22): 7191. [4] HE Jia, LIU Bing-feng, LI Jun(贺 佳, 刘冰峰, 李 军). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2015,46(2): 261. [5] Liu J G, Miller J R, Haboudane D, et al. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008,34(S1): S124. [6] ZHU Xu-chao, YUAN Guo-fu, YI Xiao-bo, et al(朱绪超, 袁国富, 易小波,等). Arid Land Geography(干旱区地理), 2014,37(6): 1248. [7] Cristiano P M, Posse G, Di Bella C M, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2010,31(15): 4095. [8] MA Wen-yong, WANG Xun-ming(马文勇, 王训明). Progress in Geography(地理科学进展), 2016,35(1): 25. [9] Haboudane D, Miller J R, Pattey E, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014,90: 337. [10] Nakaji T, Ide R, Oguma H, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007,109(3): 274. [11] WANG Zheng-xing, LIU Chuang, HUETE Alfredo(王正兴, 刘 闯, HUETE Alfredo). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2003,23(5): 980. [12] LI Zhe, GUO Xu-dong, GU Chun, et al(李 喆, 郭旭东, 古 春,等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报),2016,20(2): 297. [13] LIU Rong-yuan, WANG Ji-hua, YANG Gui-jun, et al(刘镕源, 王纪华, 杨贵军,等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2011,27(3): 220. [14] LIU Huan-jun, ZHANG Bai, LIU Dian-wei, et al(刘焕军, 张 柏, 刘殿伟,等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2008, 12(4): 647. [15] CHEN Xiao-qiu, WANG Heng(陈效逑, 王 恒). Acta Geographica Sinica(地理学报), 2009, 64(1): 84. [16] XU Jian-bo, CHEN Jin-fa, HU Yue-ming, et al(徐剑波, 陈进发, 胡月明,等). Pratacultural Science(草业学报), 2011,28(3): 359.[17] Gnyp M L, Bareth G, Li F, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2014, 33: 232. [18] GAO Yan-hua, CHEN Liang-fu, LIU Qin-huo, et al(高彦华, 陈良富, 柳钦火, 等). Journal of Remote Sensing(遥感学报), 2006,10(5): 798. [19] Sims D A, Gamon J A. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003,84(9): 526. [20] HUANG Chun-yan, WANG Deng-wei, CHENG Qi, et al(黄春燕, 王登伟, 程 麒,等). Cotton Science(棉花学报), 2012,24(4): 336. [21] DU Zi-qiang, WANG Jian, SHEN Yu-dan(杜自强, 王 建, 沈宇丹). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2006,21(4): 338. [22] TONG Qing-xi, ZHANG Bing, ZHENG Lan-fen(童庆禧, 张 兵, 郑兰芬). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing-Principle, Technology and Application(高光谱遥感-原理、技术与应用). Beijing: Higher Education Press(北京: 高等教育出版社), 2006. 137. [23] ZHANG Jun, SHEN Ya-ting, WANG Xue-jun(张 俊, 沈亚婷, 王学军). Journal of Agro-Environment Science(农业环境科学学报), 2011,30(8): 1622.
|
[1] |
CAO Yue1, BAO Ni-sha1, 2*, ZHOU Bin3, GU Xiao-wei1, 2, LIU Shan-jun1, YU Mo-li1. Research on Remote Sensing Inversion Method of Surface Moisture Content of Iron Tailings Based on Measured Spectra and Domestic Gaofen-5 Hyperspectral High-Resolution Satellites[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1225-1233. |
[2] |
LAI Si-han1, LIU Yan-song1, 2, 3*, LI Cheng-lin1, WANG Di1, HE Xing-hui1, LIU Qi1, SHEN Qian4. Study on Hyperspectral Inversion of Rare-Dispersed Element Cadmium Content in Lead-Zinc Ores[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1275-1281. |
[3] |
ZHANG Xiu-quan1, LI Zhi-wei1*, ZHENG De-cong1*, SONG Hai-yan1, WANG Guo-liang2. VIS-NIR Hyperspectral Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Based on
Stacking Generalization Model[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 903-910. |
[4] |
HU Yi-bin1, BAO Ni-sha1, 2*, LIU Shan-jun1, 2, MAO Ya-chun1, 2, SONG Liang3. Research on Hyperspectral Features and Recognition Methods of Typical Camouflage Materials[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 297-302. |
[5] |
ZHANG Chao1, 2, LIU Shan-jun1*, YI Wen-hua1, XIE Zi-chao2, LIU Bo-xiong2, YUE Heng1. Effect of Granularity on the Characteristics of Visible-Near Infrared Spectra of Different Coal Particles[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3858-3863. |
[6] |
XU Liang-ji1, 2, MENG Xue-ying2, WEI Ren2, ZHANG Kun2. Experimental Research on Coal-Rock Identification Method Based on
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2135-2142. |
[7] |
FU Yan-hua1, LIU Jing2*, MAO Ya-chun2, CAO Wang2, HUANG Jia-qi2, ZHAO Zhan-guo3. Experimental Study on Quantitative Inversion Model of Heavy Metals in Soda Saline-Alkali Soil Based on RBF Neural Network[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(05): 1595-1600. |
[8] |
MAO Ya-chun1, WEN Jian1*, FU Yan-hua2, CAO Wang1, ZHAO Zhan-guo3, DING Rui-bo1. Quantitative Inversion Model Based on the Visible and Near-Infrared Spectrum for Skarn-Type Iron Ore[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(01): 68-73. |
[9] |
WANG Dong, LIU Shan-jun*, MAO Ya-chun, LI Heng-yu, QI Yu-xin. Effect of Grade on Reflectance Spectra of Anshan Iron Mine[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(10): 3193-3198. |
[10] |
MAO Ya-chun1,2, DING Rui-bo1*, LIU Shan-jun1,2, BAO Ni-sha1,2. Research on Inversion Model of Low-Grade Porphyry Copper Deposit Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(08): 2474-2478. |
[11] |
YE Fa-wang1, WANG Jian-gang1, QIU Jun-ting1, ZHANG Chuan1, YU Xin-qi2, LIU Xiu2. Study on Correlation Between Total Organic Carbon, Soluble Hydrocarbon, Pyrolytic Hydrocarbon Content and Spectral Index in Source Rocks[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(04): 1001-1006. |
[12] |
YU Mo-li, LIU Shan-jun*, SONG Liang, HUANG Jian-wei, LI Tian-zi, WANG Dong. Spectral Characteristics and Remote Sensing Model of Tailings with Different Water Contents[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(10): 3096-3101. |
[13] |
ZHANG Dong-hui, ZHAO Ying-jun, ZHAO Ning-bo, QIN Kai, PEI Cheng-kai, YANG Yue-chao. A New Indirect Extraction Method for Selenium Content in Black Soil from Hyperspectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(07): 2237-2243. |
[14] |
SONG Liang, LIU Shan-jun*, MAO Ya-chun, WANG Dong, YU Mo-li. A Classification Method Based on the Visible Spectrum for Burned and Unburned Gangue Distinguishment[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1148-1153. |
[15] |
MAO Ya-chun, WANG Dong, WANG Yue, LIU Shan-jun*. A FeO/TFe Determination Method of BIF Based on the Visible and Near-Infrared Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(03): 765-770. |
|
|
|
|