| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Research on Cloud Phase Detemination Using Infrared Emissivity Spectrum Data (1): Cloud Phase Determination |
| LIU Lei*, SUN Xue-jin, GAO Tai-chang |
| College of Meteorology and Oceanography, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 211101, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a key factor in the climate model, cloud phase is an important prerequisite to performing cloud property retrievals from remote sensor measurements. The ability to infer cloud phase using cloud emissivity spectra is investigated by numerical simulations. It is shown that for emissivity below 0.95, several spectral features such as the slopes, the ratios and the differences of the emissivity are consistent with the variation of cloud phase in some spectral regions. Specifically, these features include the slope of the cloud emissivity between 800 and 900 cm-1, the slope of the cloud emissivity between 900 and 1 000 cm-1, the difference in the mean emissivity between above-mentioned two regions, the ratio of the emissivity at 862.1 cm-1 to the emissivity at 989.8 cm-1, the difference in the emissivity between 862.1 and 989.8 cm-1, the ratio of the emissivity at 1 900.1 cm-1 to the emissivity at 2 029.3 cm-1, the ratio of the mean emissivity for far-infrared region to the emissivity at 900 cm-1. A cloud phase classifier is proposed based on support vector machines (SVM). A series of simulations including various cloud patterns are performed. The RBF kernel function parameters and the penalty factor of SVM are selected by using the genetic algorithm. The phase determination algorithm is applied for collecting data from the AERI at the SGP site. The results from the ground-based multisensor cloud phase classifier proposed by Shupe are used to validate the phase determination algorithm. It is found the two results are consistent in general. 30% clouds are indicated as opaque due to its high emissivity. The cloud with small lidar’s depolarization is misclassified as clear sky by the Shupe method. It can be concluded that the proposed algorithm considering the spectral information (spectral slopes, ratios and differences) is efficient for cloud phase determination of thin cloud.
|
|
Received: 2015-12-23
Accepted: 2016-04-15
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIU Lei
E-mail: liuleidll@gmail.com
|
|
[1] Shupe M D. Geophysical Research Letters, 2007, 34：L22809.
[2] Key J R, Intrieri J M. J. Appl. Meteor., 2000, 39: 1797.
[3] Rossow W B, Schiffer R A. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1999, 80: 2261.
[4] Daniel J S, Solomon S, Portmann R W, et al. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002, 107: 4599.
[5] Sassen K. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1991, 72(12): 1848.
[6] Straka J M, Zrnic′ D S, Ryzhkov A V. J. Appl. Meteor., 2000, 39: 1341.
[7] Ackerman S A, Smith W L, Revercomb H E, et al. Mon. Wea. Rev., 1990, 118: 2377.
[8] Strabala K I, Ackerman S A, Menzel W P. Journal of Applied Meteorology 1994, 33: 212.
[9] Lubin D. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2004, 109: D04204.
[10] Turner D D, Ackerman S A, Baum B A, et al. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2003, 42(6): 701.
[11] Garrett T J, Zhao C. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2013, 6(5): 1227.
[12] Knuteson R O, Revercomb H E, Best F A, et al. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2004, 21: 1763.
[13] Knuteson R O, Revercomb H E, Best F A, et al. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2004, 21: 1777.
[14] Smith W L, Ma X L, Ackerman S A, et al. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 1993, 50: 1708.
[15] Turner D D. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2005, 44(4): 427.
[16] DeSlover D H, Smith W L, Piironen P K, et al. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 1999, 16: 251.
[17] Bohren C F, Huffman D R. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 2007.
[18] Rathke C. Geophysical Research Letters, 2002, 29: 1209.
[19] Linjun P, Daren L. Atmpspheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2012, 5(5): 439.
[20] Sun Z, Shine K P. J. Climate, 1995，(8): 1874.
[21] Borg L A, Holz R E, Turner D D. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38(5): L05807. |
| [1] |
BAO Hao1, 2，ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
| [2] |
CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, MA Qian1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Genetic Algorithm Optimized BP Neural Network for Quantitative
Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals in XRF[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3742-3746. |
| [3] |
SHEN Si-cong, ZHANG Jing-xue, CHEN Ming-hui, LI Zhi-wei, SUN Sheng-nan, YAN Xue-bing*. Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of
Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi-Spectrum[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3847-3852. |
| [4] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
| [5] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
| [6] |
LI Wen-wen1, 2, LONG Chang-jiang1, 2, 4*, LI Shan-jun1, 2, 3, 4, CHEN Hong1, 2, 4. Detection of Mixed Pesticide Residues of Prochloraz and Imazalil in
Citrus Epidermis by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3052-3058. |
| [7] |
LIU Fei1, TAN Jia-jin1*, XIE Gu-ai2, SU Jun3, YE Jian-ren1. Early Diagnosis of Pine Wilt Disease Based on Hyperspectral Data and Needle Resistivity[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(10): 3280-3285. |
| [8] |
MA Qian1, 2, YANG Wan-qi1, 2, LI Fu-sheng1, 2*, CHENG Hui-zhu1, 2, ZHAO Yan-chun1, 2. Research on Classification of Heavy Metal Pb in Honeysuckle Based on XRF and Transfer Learning[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2729-2733. |
| [9] |
LÜ Shi-lei1, 2, 3, WANG Hong-wei1, LI Zhen1, 2, 3*, ZHOU Xu1, ZHAO Jing1. Hyperspectral Identification Model of Cantonese Tangerine Peel Based on BWO-SVM Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2894-2901. |
| [10] |
WANG Jun-jie1, YUAN Xi-ping2, 3, GAN Shu1, 2*, HU Lin1, ZHAO Hai-long1. Hyperspectral Identification Method of Typical Sedimentary Rocks in Lufeng Dinosaur Valley[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(09): 2855-2861. |
| [11] |
ZHANG Hai-liang1, XIE Chao-yong1, TIAN Peng1, ZHAN Bai-shao1, CHEN Zai-liang1, LUO Wei1*, LIU Xue-mei2*. Measurement of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Data-Driven Machine Learning Method[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2226-2231. |
| [12] |
LI Hao-dong1, 2, LI Ju-zi1*, CHEN Yan-lin1, HUANG Yu-jing1, Andy Hsitien Shen1*. Establishing Support Vector Machine SVM Recognition Model to Identify Jadeite Origin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2252-2257. |
| [13] |
LI Bin, HAN Zhao-yang, WANG Qiu, SUN Zhao-xiang, LIU Yan-de*. Research on Bruise Level Detection of Loquat Based on Hyperspectral
Imaging Technology[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1792-1799. |
| [14] |
PAN Zhao-jie1, SUN Gen-yun1, 2*, ZHANG Ai-zhu1, FU Hang1, WANG Xin-wei3, REN Guang-wei3. Tobacco Disease Detection Model Based on Band Selection[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1023-1029. |
| [15] |
WANG Yu-ye1, 2, LI Hai-bin1, 2, JIANG Bo-zhou1, 2, GE Mei-lan1, 2, CHEN Tu-nan3, FENG Hua3, WU Bin4ZHU Jun-feng4, XU De-gang1, 2, YAO Jian-quan1, 2. Terahertz Spectroscopic Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Ischemia in Rats[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 788-794. |
|
|
|
|
