| 光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Combined Transmission Laser Spectrum of Core-Offset Fiber and BP Neural Network for Temperature Sensing Research |
| WANG Fang1,2, ZHU Han1, LI Yun-peng1, LIU Yu-fang1, 2* |
1. College of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
2. Infrared Optoelectronic Science and Technology Key Laboratory of Henan Province, Xinxiang 453007, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract When studying the wavelength response to the temperature of the single mode fiber interference laser spectrum，a three layer BP neural network model is built to solve the problem of high complexity and low accuracy of temperature measurement system. With the Discussion of the parameters of network model, we obtain the optimal network structure by comparing the data acquisition which is the laser wavelength corresponding to its temperature trained by BP neural network. With network training completed and the wavelength of input laser reached the specified value, the corresponding temperature prediction can be obtained from the output layer. In conclusion, it shows a clear correlation between the predictive value and the actual value, i.e. the former is approximately equal to the latter. The correlation coefficients of the calibration and prediction are 0.999 61 and 0.979 27, respectively; while the standard errors of the calibration and prediction are 0.017 5 and 0.144 0, respectively, and the average relative error of prediction set is 0.17%. The residual predictive deviation (RPD), obtained theoretically, is 5.258 3. RPD>3. It indicates that the calibration effect is good, and the model can be used for practical testing. In addition, the algorithm is also applied to the system of double coupled structure with single-mode core-offset fiber and correction for the temperature measurement. The results show that BP neural network method can deal with the nonlinear relationship between the laser spectral data and the temperature in the optical fiber temperature measurement system. The correlation and the average relative error between the predicted temperature and the true temperature are 0.996 58 and 0.63%, respectively. The precision and stability of the fiber optic temperature sensor are significantly improved. At the same time, the feasibility of the proposed algorithm is verified in the fiber optical sensor system. It also provides a new way for the accurate measurement of pressure, curvature and other physical quantities of the core-offset fiber.
|
|
Received: 2015-10-28
Accepted: 2016-02-16
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIU Yu-fang
E-mail: yf-liu@htu.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Li Lecheng, Xia Li, Xie Zhenhai, et al. Optics Express, 2012, 20(10): 11109.
[2] Han Wei, Tong Zhengrong, Cao Ye. Optics Communications，2014，321：134.
[3] Zhang Jing, Sun Hao, Rong Qiangzhou, et al. Chinese Optics Letters, 2012，10(7): 070607.
[4] Sun Hao, Yang Shen, Zhang Xiaolei, et al. Optics Communications, 2015，340：39.
[5] Li X W, Cho S J, Kim S T. Optics Communications, 2014，315: 147.
[6] Ding H Q, Lu Q P, Gao H Z, et al. Biomedical Optics Express, 2014，5(4): 1145.
[7] LIU Tao, LI Yong-feng，HUANG Wei(刘 涛, 李永峰, 黄 威). Infrared and Laser Engineering(红外与激光工程), 2012，41(9): 2304.
[8] Zhao Yong, Bai Lu, Wang Qi. Optics Communications，2013，309：328.
[9] Hao Xia, Tong Zhengrong, Zhang Weihua, et al. Optics Communications, 2015，335：78.
[10] Gao X J, Huang T W, Wang Z Y, et al. Cogn. Comput., 2014, 6: 331.
[11] José P, Leonardo T, Patricia M. Soft Comput, 2014，18: 1603. |
| [1] |
LI Hu1, ZHONG Yun1, 2, FENG Ya-ting1, LIN Zhen1, ZHU Shi-jiang1, 2*. Multi-Vegetation Index Soil Moisture Inversion Model Based on UAV
Remote Sensing[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 207-214. |
| [2] |
ZHU Yan-ping1, CUI Chuan-jin1*, CHENG Peng-fei1, 2, PAN Jin-yan1, SU Hao1, 2, ZHANG Yi1. Measurement of Oil Pollutants by Three-Dimensional Fluorescence
Spectroscopy Combined With BP Neural Network and SWATLD[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(08): 2467-2475. |
| [3] |
LUO Dong-jie, WANG Meng, ZHANG Xiao-shuan, XIAO Xin-qing*. Vis/NIR Based Spectral Sensing for SSC of Table Grapes[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(07): 2146-2152. |
| [4] |
ZHOU Qi1, 2, WANG Jian-jun1, 2*, HUO Zhong-yang1, 2*, LIU Chang1, 2, WANG Wei-ling1, 2, DING Lin3. UAV Multi-Spectral Remote Sensing Estimation of Wheat Canopy SPAD Value in Different Growth Periods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(06): 1912-1920. |
| [5] |
OUYANG Ke-chen1, 2, XING Li2, WANG Zheng2, 3, FENG Xiao-juan2*, ZHANG Jin-tao2, REN Cheng1, YANG Xing-tuan1. Analysis and Suppression of Laser-Induced Error in Temperature
Measurement Based on Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(04): 1242-1247. |
| [6] |
ZHANG Fu1, 2, 3, CAO Wei-hua1, CUI Xia-hua1, WANG Xin-yue1, FU San-ling4*, ZHANG Ya-kun1. Non-Destructive Detection of Soluble Solids in Cherry Tomatoes by
Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Based on SG-CARS-IBP[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 737-743. |
| [7] |
ZHU Chen-guang1, LIU Ya-jun2, LI Xin-xing1, 3, GONG Wei-wei4*, GUO Wei1. Detection Method of Freshness of Penaeus Vannamei Based on
Hyperspectral[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(01): 107-110. |
| [8] |
LIU Meng-xuan1, 2, 3, 4, WU Qiong5, WANG Xu-quan1, 2, 4, CHEN Qi5, ZHANG Yong-gang1, 2, HUANG Song-lei1, 2*, FANG Jia-xiong1, 2*. Validity and Redundancy of Spectral Data in the Detection Algorithm of Sucrose-Doped Content in Tea[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(11): 3647-3652. |
| [9] |
LI Zi-zhao, BI Shou-dong, CUI Yu-huan, HAO Shuang*. Comparison of Forest Stock Volume Inversion Methods Coupled With Multiple Features——A Case Study of Forest in Yarlung Zangbo River Basin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3263-3268. |
| [10] |
XU Liang-ji1, 2, MENG Xue-ying2, WEI Ren2, ZHANG Kun2. Experimental Research on Coal-Rock Identification Method Based on
Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(07): 2135-2142. |
| [11] |
YU Yue, YU Hai-ye, LI Xiao-kai, WANG Hong-jian, LIU Shuang, ZHANG Lei, SUI Yuan-yuan*. Hyperspectral Inversion Model for SPAD of Rice Leaves Based on Optimized Spectral Index[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(04): 1092-1097. |
| [12] |
PING Li1, ZHAO Rong1, YANG Bin1*, YANG Yang1, CHEN Xiao-long2, WANG Ying1. Inversion of Particle Size Distribution in Spectral Extinction Measurements Using PCA and BP Neural Network Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(11): 3639-. |
| [13] |
LIU Ting-yue1, DAI Jing-jing2*, TIAN Shu-fang1. A Neural Network Recognition Method for Garnets Subclass Based on Hyper Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1758-1763. |
| [14] |
HE Shao-fang1, SHEN Lu-ming1, XIE Hong-xia2*. Hyperspectral Estimation Model of Soil Organic Matter Content Using Generative Adversarial Networks[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(06): 1905-1911. |
| [15] |
LIU You-fu, XIAO De-qin*, WANG Chun-tao. Fertilized Eggs’ Air-Cell Change Monitoring Algorithm Based on Thermal-Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 572-578. |
|
|
|
|
