光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimating Biomass Burned Areas from Multispectral Dataset Detected by Multiple-Satellite |
YU Chao1, 2, CHEN Liang-fu1*, LI Shen-shen1, TAO Jin-hua1, SU Lin1 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensingand Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract Biomass burning makes up an important part of both trace gases and particulate matter emissions, which can efficiently degrade air quality and reduce visibility, destabilize the global climate system at regional to global scales. Burned area is one of the primary parameters necessary to estimate emissions, and considered to be the largest source of error in the emission inventory.Satellite-based fire observations can offer a reliable source of fire occurrence data on regional and global scales, a variety of sensors have been used to detect and mapfires in two general approaches: burn scar mapping and active fire detection. However, both of the two approaches have limitations. In this article, we explore the relationship between hotspot data and burned area for the Southeastern United States, where a significant amount of biomass burnings from both prescribed and wild fire took place.MODIS (Moderate resolution imaging spectrometer) data, which has high temporal-resolution, can be used to monitor ground biomassburning in time and provided hot spot data in this study. However, pixel sizeof MODIS hot spot can’t stand for the real ground burned area. Through analysis of the variation of vegetation band reflectance between pre- and post-burn,we extracted the burned area from Landsat-5 TM (Thematic Mapper) images by using the differential normalized burn ratio (dNBR) which is based on TM band4 (0.84 μm) and TM band 7(2.22 μm) data. We combined MODIS fire hot spot data andLandsat-5 TM burned scars data to build the burned area estimation model, results showed that the linear correlation coefficient is 0.63 and the relationships vary as a function of vegetation cover. Based on the National Land Cover Database (NLCD), we built burned area estimation model over different vegetation cover, and got effective burned area per fire pixel, values for forest, grassland, shrub, cropland and wetland are 0.69, 1.27, 0.86, 0.72 and 0.94 km2 respectively. We validated the burned area estimates by using theground survey data from National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC), our results are more close to the ground survey data than burned area from Global Fire Emissions Database(GFED) and MODIS burned area product (MCD45), which omitted many small prescribed fires. We concluded that our model can provide more accurate burned area parameters for developing fire emission inventory, and be better for estimatingemissions from biomass burning.
|
Received: 2014-03-31
Accepted: 2014-06-19
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
CHEN Liang-fu
E-mail: chenlf@radi.ac.cn
|
|
[1] Wiedinmyer C, Akagi S K, Yokelson R J, et al. Geosci. Model. Dev., 2011, 4(3): 625. [2] van der Werf G R, Randerson J T, Giglio L, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2006, 6: 3423. [3] Naeher L P, Brauer M, Lipsett M, et al. Inhal. Toxicol., 2007, 19(1): 67. [4] Langmann B, Duncan B, Textor C, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(1): 107. [5] Wiedinmyer C, Quayle B, Geron C, et al. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(19): 3419. [6] Soja A J, Al-Saadi J, Giglio L, et al. J. Appl . Remote Sens., 2009,3(1):031504. [7] Giglio L, Descloitres J, Justice C O, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 87(2-3): 273. [8] TIAN Qing-jiu, WANG Ling, BAO Ying, etal(田庆久,王 玲,包 颖,等). Scientia Sinica Informationis(中国科学-信息科学), 2011, 41(Suppl.): 117. [9] Giglio L, Loboda T, Roy D P, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(2): 408. [10] Randerson J T, Chen Y, van der Werf G R, et al. J. Geophys Res-Biogeosci., 2012,117(G4):1. [11] Giglio L, van der Werf G R, Randerson J T, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2006, 6: 957. [12] Smith R, Adams M, Maier S, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 109(1): 95. [13] Tansey K, Beston J, Hoscilo A, et al. J. Geophys Res-Atmos, 2008, 113: D23112. [14] Zhang X, Hecobian A, Zheng M, et al. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 10(14): 6839. [15] Chander G, Markham B L, Helder D L. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2009, 113(5): 893. |
[1] |
LI Chun-qiang1, 2, GAO Yong-gang1, 2, XU Han-qiu1, 2*. Cross Comparison Between Landsat New Land Surface Temperature
Product and the Corresponding MODIS Product[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 940-948. |
[2] |
LI Zi-zhao, BI Shou-dong, CUI Yu-huan, HAO Shuang*. Comparison of Forest Stock Volume Inversion Methods Coupled With Multiple Features——A Case Study of Forest in Yarlung Zangbo River Basin[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(10): 3263-3268. |
[3] |
GAO Xiang1, QI Yu-ting1, DONG Bin1*, CUI Yu-huan1, HAO Shuang1, ZHAO Fang2, WANG Hong-chang3. Impact of Water Level Fluctuations on Habitats of Wintering Migratory Birds Based on Multispectral Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 41(02): 579-585. |
[4] |
LONG Ze-hao1, QIN Qi-ming1, 2, 3*, ZHANG Tian-yuan1, XU Wei1. Prediction of Continuous Time Series Leaf Area Index Based on Long Short-Term Memory Network: a Case Study of Winter Wheat[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(03): 898-904. |
[5] |
ZHANG Ai-wu1, 2, ZHANG Shuai1, 2, GUO Chao-fan1, 2*, LIU Lu-lu1, 2, HU Shao-xing3, CHAI Sha-tuo4. Grass Biomass Inversion Based on Landsat 8 Spectral Derived Data Classification System[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(01): 239-246. |
[6] |
LI Jing, DENG Xiao-juan, YANG Zhen, LIU Qian-long, WANG Yuan, CUI Lü-yuan. A Method of Extracting Mining Disturbance in Arid Grassland Based on Time Series Multispectral Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(12): 3788-3793. |
[7] |
PANG Shu-na1, ZHU Wei-ning1*, CHEN Jiang2, SUN Nan3, HUANG Li-tong1, ZHANG Yu-sen1, ZHANG Ze-liang1. Using Landsat-8 to Remotely Estimate and Observe Spatio-Temporal Variations of Total Suspended Matter in Zhoushan Coastal Regions[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(12): 3826-3832. |
[8] |
JI Xuan1, 2, CHEN Yun-fang3, LUO Xian1, 2, LI Yun-gang1, 2. Study on the Identification Method of Glacier in Mountain Shadows Based on Landsat 8 OLI Image[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(12): 3857-3863. |
[9] |
YANG Dong-xu1,2, WEI Jing3,4*, ZHONG Yong-de1*. Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval over Beijing Using MODIS Satellite Images[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(11): 3464-3469. |
[10] |
LIU Zhen-yu1, 3, CUI Ting-wei2, ZHANG Sheng-hua1, ZHAO Wen-jing4. Piecewise Linear Retrieval Suspended Particulate Matter for the Yellow River Estuary Based on Landsat8 OLI[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(08): 2536-2541. |
[11] |
ZHAO Shuai-yang1, HU Xing-bang1, JING Xin2, JIANG Si-jia1, HE Li-qin1, MA Ai-nai1, YAN Lei1*. Analyses of Land Surface Emissivity Characteristics in Mid-Infrared Bands[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(05): 1393-1399. |
[12] |
CHANG Hao-xue1, CAI Xiao-bin2, CHEN Xiao-ling1, 3*, SUN Kun1. Response Characteristics Analysis of Different Vegetation Indices to Leaf Area Index of Rice[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 38(01): 205-211. |
[13] |
LIU Huan-jun, NING Dong-hao, KANG Ran, JIN Hui-ning, ZHANG Xin-le*, SHENG Lei . A Study on Predicting Model of Organic Matter Contend Incorporating Soil Moisture Variation [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(02): 566-570. |
[14] |
DONG Xue1,2, TIAN Jing1*, ZHANG Ren-hua1,HE Dong-xian3, CHEN Qing-mei1 . Study on the Relationship between Soil Emissivity Spectra and Content of Soil Elements[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(02): 557-565. |
[15] |
GE Wei1, CHEN Liang-fu1, SI Yi-dan1, GE Qiang2, FAN Meng1*, LI Shen-shen1*. Haze Spectral Analysis and Detection Algorithm Using Satellite Remote Sensing Data[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 36(12): 3817-3824. |
|
|
|
|