光谱学与光谱分析 |
|
|
|
|
|
Multivariate Detection Limits of Baicalin in Qingkailing Injection Based on Four NIR Spectrometer Types |
PENG Yan-fang, SHI Xin-yuan, ZHOU Lu-wei, PEI Yan-ling, LI Yang, WU Zhi-sheng*, QIAO Yan-jiang* |
Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine Information Engineering, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100102, China |
|
|
Abstract Multivariate detection limits (MDLs) of different types of near-infrared instruments were investigated to guide the selection of device type for TCM NIR analysis. In this paper, near-infrared spectroscopy of Qingkailing injection was performed in transmission mode on four near-infrared spectrometers named a, b, c and d, respectively. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used as the reference method to determine the content of baicalin in Qingkailing injection. Partial least squares (PLS) and interval partial least squares (iPLS) quantitative models of baicalin in Qingkailing injection were established and MDLs of quantitative models based on different types of instruments were calculated. The determination coefficient of prediction(R2pre)and the root mean square errors of prediction (SEP) of PLS models of four different near-infrared spectrometers are 0.976 2 and 230.4 μg·mL-1 (a), 0.956 1 and 246.4 μg·mL-1 (b), 0.966 2 and 264.4 μg·mL-1 (c), 0.998 5 and 71.5 μg·mL-1 (d). And the model of instrument d shows a better prediction performance than the other three types. There are no remarkable superiorities in predictability in iPLS models of instruments a and b after variable selection, since the R2pre and SEP values for instruments a and b are 0.977 1 and 218.4 μg·mL-1, and 0.975 4 and 219.4 μg·mL-1, respectively. Models c and d show no results of variable selection. MDLs (Δ0.05, 0.05) of different instruments are all less than 250 μg·mL-1, and the MDLs of instruments c and d reach to 58 and 2.9 μg·mL-1 respectively. The results reveal that the predictability of models and corresponding MDLs are different for different detection equipments. This paper innovatively used the theory of MDL to investigate the detection performance of different types of NIR instruments. The results demonstrated the feasibility of the approach. And it is expected that in actual applications, choosing the right type of instrument should be based on the characteristics of the study carrier to ensure quantitative accuracy.
|
Received: 2013-05-16
Accepted: 2013-07-15
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WU Zhi-sheng, QIAO Yan-jiang
E-mail: yjqiao@263.net; WZS@bucm.edu.cn
|
|
[1] Ozaki Y. Analytical Sciences, 2012, 28(6): 545. [2] Genkawa Takuma, Watari Masahiro, Nishii Takashi, et al. Applied Spectroscopy, 2012, 66(7): 773. [3] Krapf Lutz, Gronauer Andreas, Schmidhalter Urs, et al. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2012, 19(6): 479. [4] Xiong Haoshu, Gong Xingchu, Qu Haibin. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2012, 70(11): 178. [5] JIANG Bo-hai, WANG Qing, WANG Shi-sheng, et al(姜博海, 汪 晴, 王世盛, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2013, 33(1): 20. [6] CHEN Chen, LI Wen-long, QU Hai-bin, et al(陈 晨, 李文龙, 瞿海斌, 等). Chinese Herbal Medicines(中草药), 2013, 44(1): 47. [7] Wu Z, Peng Y, Cheng W, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2013,137: 394. [8] Xu Bing, Wu Zhisheng, Lin Zhaozhou, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2012, 720: 22. [9] XU Bing, SHI Xin-yuan, QIAO Yan-jiang, et al(徐 冰, 史新元, 乔延江, 等). China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy(中华中医药杂志), 2012, 4: 3. [10] Alcalà Manel, León J Joshua, Ropero Jorge, et al. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2008, 97(12): 5318. [11] Blanco Marcel, Castillo Miguel, Peinado Antonio, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2007, 581(2): 318. [12] Boqué R, Larrechi M S, Rius F X. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1999, 45(1): 397. [13] Clayton C A, Hines J W, Elkins P D. Analytical Chemistry, 1987, 59(20): 2506. [14] Wu Zhisheng, Sui Chenglin, Xu Bing, et al. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2013, 77(4): 16. [15] Pereira A F C, Pontes M J C, Neto F F G, et al. Food Research International, 2008, 41(4): 341. [16] JI Hai-yan(吉海彦). Modern Scientific Instruments(现代科学仪器), 2001, 6: 25. [17] CHU Xiao-li, LU Wan-zhen(褚小立, 陆婉珍). Analytical Instrumentation(分析仪器), 2008, 1: 3. |
[1] |
GAO Feng1, 2, XING Ya-ge3, 4, LUO Hua-ping1, 2, ZHANG Yuan-hua3, 4, GUO Ling3, 4*. Nondestructive Identification of Apricot Varieties Based on Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 44-51. |
[2] |
LI Yu1, ZHANG Ke-can1, PENG Li-juan2*, ZHU Zheng-liang1, HE Liang1*. Simultaneous Detection of Glucose and Xylose in Tobacco by Using Partial Least Squares Assisted UV-Vis Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 103-110. |
[3] |
LIU Jia, ZHENG Ya-long, WANG Cheng-bo, YIN Zuo-wei*, PAN Shao-kui. Spectra Characterization of Diaspore-Sapphire From Hotan, Xinjiang[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 176-180. |
[4] |
BAO Hao1, 2,ZHANG Yan1, 2*. Research on Spectral Feature Band Selection Model Based on Improved Harris Hawk Optimization Algorithm[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(01): 148-157. |
[5] |
HE Qing-yuan1, 2, REN Yi1, 2, LIU Jing-hua1, 2, LIU Li1, 2, YANG Hao1, 2, LI Zheng-peng1, 2, ZHAN Qiu-wen1, 2*. Study on Rapid Determination of Qualities of Alfalfa Hay Based on NIRS[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3753-3757. |
[6] |
HU Cai-ping1, HE Cheng-yu2, KONG Li-wei3, ZHU You-you3*, WU Bin4, ZHOU Hao-xiang3, SUN Jun2. Identification of Tea Based on Near-Infrared Spectra and Fuzzy Linear Discriminant QR Analysis[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3802-3805. |
[7] |
LIU Xin-peng1, SUN Xiang-hong2, QIN Yu-hua1*, ZHANG Min1, GONG Hui-li3. Research on t-SNE Similarity Measurement Method Based on Wasserstein Divergence[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3806-3812. |
[8] |
BAI Xue-bing1, 2, SONG Chang-ze1, ZHANG Qian-wei1, DAI Bin-xiu1, JIN Guo-jie1, 2, LIU Wen-zheng1, TAO Yong-sheng1, 2*. Rapid and Nndestructive Dagnosis Mthod for Posphate Dficiency in “Cabernet Sauvignon” Gape Laves by Vis/NIR Sectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3719-3725. |
[9] |
WANG Qi-biao1, HE Yu-kai1, LUO Yu-shi1, WANG Shu-jun1, XIE Bo2, DENG Chao2*, LIU Yong3, TUO Xian-guo3. Study on Analysis Method of Distiller's Grains Acidity Based on
Convolutional Neural Network and Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(12): 3726-3731. |
[10] |
LUO Li, WANG Jing-yi, XU Zhao-jun, NA Bin*. Geographic Origin Discrimination of Wood Using NIR Spectroscopy
Combined With Machine Learning Techniques[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3372-3379. |
[11] |
ZHANG Shu-fang1, LEI Lei2, LEI Shun-xin2, TAN Xue-cai1, LIU Shao-gang1, YAN Jun1*. Traceability of Geographical Origin of Jasmine Based on Near
Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3389-3395. |
[12] |
YANG Qun1, 2, LING Qi-han1, WEI Yong1, NING Qiang1, 2, KONG Fa-ming1, ZHOU Yi-fan1, 2, ZHANG Hai-lin1, WANG Jie1, 2*. Non-Destructive Monitoring Model of Functional Nitrogen Content in
Citrus Leaves Based on Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3396-3403. |
[13] |
HUANG Meng-qiang1, KUANG Wen-jian2, 3*, LIU Xiang1, HE Liang4. Quantitative Analysis of Cotton/Polyester/Wool Blended Fiber Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Based on 1D-CNN[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3565-3570. |
[14] |
HUANG Zhao-di1, CHEN Zai-liang2, WANG Chen3, TIAN Peng2, ZHANG Hai-liang2, XIE Chao-yong2*, LIU Xue-mei4*. Comparing Different Multivariate Calibration Methods Analyses for Measurement of Soil Properties Using Visible and Short Wave-Near
Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3535-3540. |
[15] |
KANG Ming-yue1, 3, WANG Cheng1, SUN Hong-yan3, LI Zuo-lin2, LUO Bin1*. Research on Internal Quality Detection Method of Cherry Tomatoes Based on Improved WOA-LSSVM[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(11): 3541-3550. |
|
|
|
|