一种变形标准加入法及其在等离子体发射光谱分析中的应用

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)11-3579-06

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2441 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：在小体积(< 50 μL)液体取样时，容易产生较大的取样误差，为了降低分析结果的不确定度，常常用质量定量法代替体积定量法。传统标准加入法以样品体积定量，不能用于以样品质量定量的场合。为此，我们提出了一种变形标准加入法，以便用于以样品质量定量的场合。以ICP-OES法测定复杂溶液体系中低含量及微量元素Hg，Mo和Rh为例，对变形标准加入法进行了介绍。标准加入法的目的是为了校正溶液基体效应，而溶液基体效应包括两种不同类型的干扰：“恒定干扰”和“比例干扰”。变形标准加入法只能校正溶液基体效应中的“比例干扰”，“比例干扰”的大小可以用一个定量指标k表示：当k=1时，表示不存在“比例干扰”的影响；k偏离1越远，则“比例干扰”的影响越大。至于“恒定干扰”的影响，则可以利用仪器自身的背景校正方法予以降低或消除。变形标准加入法测定结果不确定度主要来自于背景校正，与所选分析线的信背比密切相关。信背比越低，背景校正的不确定度越高，因此实际分析中应尽可能选择具有较高信背比的分析线，否则，即使事先经过了背景校正，最终的分析结果也可能包含很大的误差。

关键词：标准加入法；背景校正；电感耦合等离子发射光谱；基体效应；信背比

Abstract：When a small volume (<50 μL) of liquid is sampling, it is easy to produce large sampling error. In order to reduce the uncertainty of analytical results, the quantification based on the sample volume is usually replaced by the quantification based on the sample mass. The conventional standard addition method (SAM), in which the quantification is based on the sample volume, cannot be applied when the quantification is based on the sample mass. Therefore, a modified SAM with mass-based quantification is proposed. As a demonstration, the modified SAM has been applied to determine low or trace elements Hg, Mo and Rh in complex solution with ICP-OES. The aim of the SAM is to correct the matrix effect, while the matrix effect includes two kinds of interferences: constant interference and proportional interference. Only the proportional interference can be corrected with the modified SAM, which can characterize the extent of the proportional interference with a quantitative index k: k=1 means there is no proportional interference; while the larger difference between k and 1 means greater proportional interference existing in the sample. As for constant interference, it can be reduced or eliminated by applying the background correction function of the ICP-OES instrument. The uncertainty of analytical results mainly comes from background correction, and depends on the signal-to-background ratio of the analytical line selected. The lower the signal-to-background ratio is, the greater the uncertainty of background correction is. Therefore, in the actual analysis, we should try to choose the analytical line which has as high signal-to-background ratio as possible. Otherwise, the final analytical result maybe contains very large uncertainty, even though the background correction has been made in advance.

Key words：Standard addition method; Background correction; ICP-OES; Matrix effect; Signal-to-background ratio

收稿日期: 2016-12-26 修订日期: 2017-05-10

中图分类号:

O657.3

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(21271113)资助

作者简介: 冯孝贵，1967年生，清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院副研究员 e-mail: fengxiaogui@tsinghua.edu.cn

引用本文:

冯孝贵，孔雪艳，何千舸，王建晨，陈靖. 一种变形标准加入法及其在等离子体发射光谱分析中的应用[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2017, 37(11): 3579-3584.
FENG Xiao-gui, KONG Xue-yan, HE Qian-ge, WANG Jian-chen, CHEN Jing. A Modified Standard Addition Method and Its Application in ICP Emission Spectrometry. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(11): 3579-3584.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)11-3579-06 或 https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2017/V37/I11/3579

[1] XIN Ren-xuan(辛仁轩). ICP Emission Spectrometry, 2nd edition(等离子体发射光谱分析, 第2版). Beijing: Chemical Industry Press(北京: 化学工业出版社), 2011. 157.
[2] ZHU Xing-jiang, YAO Cheng-hu, GAN Zheng-bin, et al(朱兴江, 姚成虎, 甘正斌, 等). Modern Metallurgy(现代冶金), 2015, 43(1): 12.
[3] LIU Ting, LI Jian, LEI Xiao-yan, et al(刘婷, 李剑, 雷小燕, 等). Chemical Analysis and Meterage(化学分析计量), 2015, 24(4): 72.
[4] Harris D C. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 8th Edition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 2010. 106.
[5] Saxberg B E H, Kowalski B R. Anal. Chem., 1979, 51: 1031.
[6] Booksh K, Henshaw J M, Burgess L W, et al. J Chemometrics, 1995, 9: 263.
[7] ZHANG Lei, LI Bo, SUN Bao-lian, et al(张磊, 李波, 孙宝莲, 等). Chinese J. Anal. Chem.(分析化学), 2011, 39(8): 1291.
[8] WU Yu-hong, HU Yu-peng, YU Hong-jiang(吴玉红, 胡羽鹏, 喻洪江). Chemistry(化学通报), 2014, 77(11): 1135.
[9] ZHANG Hao, JIA Yi-lü, DAI Pin-zhong, et al(张豪, 贾以律, 戴品中, 等). Shandong Chemical Industry(山东化工), 2014, 43(6): 96.
[10] YE Chen(叶晨). Phys. Test. Chem. Anal. B(理化检验-化学分册), 2014, 50(10): 1291.
[11] SONG Dan-dan, YAO Sheng-lai, SONG Feng, et al(宋丹丹, 姚胜来, 宋丰, 等). Journal of Higher Correspondence Education·Natural Science(高等函授学报·自然科学版), 1998, 1: 30.
[12] Bruce G R, Gill P S. Journal of Chemical Education, 1999, 76(6): 805.
[13] MO Sheng-jun, LIU Yong-mao(莫胜钧, 刘永懋). Chinese J. Anal. Chem.(分析化学), 1979, 7(3): 173.
[14] LIU Yong-mao, MO Sheng-jun(刘永懋, 莫胜钧). Chinese J. Anal. Chem.(分析化学), 1981, 9(4): 449.
[15] XIE Yu-xiang(谢玉祥). Bulletin of Analysis and Testing(分析测试通报), 1986, 5(2): 35.
[16] LI Ming-wei, CHEN Bao-xiu(李明伟, 陈保秀). Geological Laboratory(地质实验室), 1989, 5(2): 124.
[17] RONG Guan-yong(戎关镛). Metallurgical Analysis (冶金分析), 1991, 11(5): 30.
[18] WANG Jian-chen, SONG Chong-li, LIU Bing-ren(王建晨, 宋崇立, 刘秉仁). Journal of Nuclear and Radiochemistry(核化学与放射化学), 1995, 17(3): 129.