In Situ Investigation of the Interactions of Pyrene and Phenanthrene with Humic Acid Using Laser Induced Nanoseconds Time Resolved Fluorescence Quenching Method Combined with PARAFAC Analysis
YANG Cheng-hu1, LIU Yang-zhi1, ZHU Ya-xian2, ZHANG Yong1，3*
1. State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science of China (Xiamen University), College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
2. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
3. Zhangzhou Institute of Technology, Zhangzhou 363000, China
Abstract：The fluorescence quenching method using laser-induced nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence (LITRF) combined with parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis was developed for in situ investigation of the interactions of two typical polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pyrene (Pyr) and phenanthrene (Phe) either singly or in a mixture with Aldrich humic acid (HA). The concentration of free Pyr and Phe cannot be determined directly at the same time because the LITRF spectra of Pyr, Phe and HA are overlapping at the excitation wavelength of 266 nm. The fluorescent interference of HA can be eliminated quickly and effectively, while the fluorescence intensity and fluorescence decay curves of Pyr and Phe can be acquired by LITRF-PARAFAC analysis. The binding characteristics of PAHs with HA were described with Freundlich isothermal model. Nonlinear binding (n<1) and competitive sorption of Pyr and Phe on HA were verified, which showed that the linearity increased (n tend to be 1) and the single point binding coefficient decreased after the addition of Pyr or Phe. The degree of competition was depended on the concentrations of cosolutes, and competition was much stronger in the case of relatively high competitor concentrations. In addition, the results indicated that the binding characteristics of single component Pyr and Phe with HA obtained with LITRF-PARAFAC quenching method were in accordance with conventional fluorescence quenching method. The quenching mechanism for Pyr and Phe by HA was primarily static quenching which was also verified by quenching rate constant and fluorescence lifetime analyses. The LITRF-PARAFAC quenching method could be used for in situ investigate the interactions between mixture of PAHs and HA, which could be applied to predict and evaluate the environmental behavior and ecological risk of PAHs in real time.
杨承虎，刘洋之，朱亚先，张 勇. 基于平行因子分析的激光诱导纳秒时间分辨荧光猝灭法原位研究芘和菲与腐植酸相互作用[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2017, 37(05): 1519-1524.
YANG Cheng-hu, LIU Yang-zhi, ZHU Ya-xian, ZHANG Yong. In Situ Investigation of the Interactions of Pyrene and Phenanthrene with Humic Acid Using Laser Induced Nanoseconds Time Resolved Fluorescence Quenching Method Combined with PARAFAC Analysis. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 37(05): 1519-1524.
[1] Sun H F, Yang Y N, Zhu Y X, et al. Talanta, 2013, 116(15): 441.
[2] Mei Y, Wu F C, Wang L Y, et al. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 21(4): 414.
[3] Hur J, Kim G. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(4): 483.
[4] Chen S, Ke R H, Zha J M, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(24): 9431.
[5] Hur J, Lee B M, Shin H S. Chemosphere, 2011, 85(8): 1360.
[6] Gauthier T D, Shane E C, Guerin W F, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 1986, 20(11): 1162.
[7] DU Ke-zhao, CHEN Jia-ning, CHEN Sheng-neng, et al(杜克钊, 陈佳宁, 陈省能, 等). Jouanal of Xiamen University·Natural Science(厦门大学学报·自然科学版), 2008, 1: 131.
[8] Lu R, Sheng G P, Liang Y, et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(4): 2220.
[9] SUN Hai-feng, ZHU Ya-xian, WU Fang, et al(孙海峰, 朱亚先, 吴 芳, 等). Modern Instruments, 2012, 18(6): 1.
[10] Rudnick S M, Chen R F. Talanta, 1998, 47(4): 907.
[11] LIU Yang-zhi, YANG Cheng-hu, ZHU Ya-xian, et al(刘洋之, 杨承虎, 朱亚先, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2016, 36(10): 3332.
[12] Karlitschek P, Lewitzka F, Bünting U, et al. Applied Physics B, 1998, 67(4): 497.
[13] Andersson C A, Bro R. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2000, 52(1): 1.
[14] Pan B, Ghosh S, Xing B S. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(18): 6472.
[15] Plaza C, Xing B S, Fernandez J M, et al. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157(1): 257.
[16] Chen H, Kenny J E. Annals of Environmental Science, 2007, 1(1): 21.
[17] Laor Y, Rebhun M. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(5): 955.
[18] Pan B, Xing B S, Liu W X, et al. Chemosphere, 2007, 69(10): 1555.
[19] Yang K, Wang X L, Zhu L Z, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(18): 5804.
[20] Perre C D, Menach K L, Ibalot F, et al. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2014, 807(7): 51.
[21] Wang H B, Zhang Y J. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2014, 49(1): 78.
[22] Pitois A, Abrahamsen L G, Ivanov P I, et al. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 325(1): 93.
[23] Chen S, Inskeep W P, Williams S A, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 1994, 28(9): 1582.
[24] Selli E, Zaccaria C, Sena F, et al. Water Research, 2004, 38(9): 2268.
