石墨管涂覆-塞曼效应石墨炉原子吸收法测定土壤和沉积物中钡

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (638 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：样品使用硝酸-氢氟酸-高氯酸湿法消解，在0.015 mol·L^-1硝酸介质中，采用自制涂钨石墨管，塞曼效应背景校正技术石墨炉原子吸收法测定了土壤和沉积物中的钡。经涂钨处理的石墨管表面形成了稳定的碳化钨层，有效避免了在原子化过程中待测元素钡与石墨管直接接触形成难熔碳化物，大幅度提高了检测的灵敏度和精密度，显著延长了石墨管使用寿命。碳化钨为间充型碳化物，在高温下可以产生较强的还原性氛围，可在一定程度上避免土壤和沉积物中常见的高浓度基体成分在原子化阶段生成难熔的氧化物而干扰钡的测定。氢氧化钙分子带背景干扰可以通过稀释法消除。该法测定土壤和沉积物中钡操作简便, 快速；检出限为4.2×10^-10 g·g^-1。环境样品中钡测定的相对标准偏差范围为2.0％～6.5％, 测定标准土壤的相对偏差均小于5％。

关键词：钡;石墨炉原子吸收法;涂钨石墨管;土壤;沉积物

Abstract：The sample was decomposed by HNO₃-HF-HClO₄. Using a tungsten-coated graphite tube, trace barium in soil and sediment was determined by Zeeman graphite AAS. To avoid producing carbide, the graphite tube was coated with tungsten. Tungsten and carbon in the surface layer of graphite tube became tungsten carbide. Tungsten carbide prevented barium and carbon from forming barium carbide, which in turn not only led to a long service life for the tube, but also increased greatly the sensitivity and precision of the determination Ba. Tungsten carbide belongs to internal filled type and can give reduction environment. To some extent, the common interfering elements co-existing in the soil and sediment had little chance to form oxides to interfere the determination of Ba in the atomization period. The method was easy and sensitive. The detection limit of Ba was 4.2×10^-10g·g^-1. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was in the range of 2.0%-6.5%(n=4). The relative deviations from the certificated values of standard soils were under 5%.

Key words：Barium;Graphite AAS;Tungsten-coated graphite;Soil;Sediment

收稿日期: 2006-09-11 修订日期: 2006-12-26

中图分类号:

O657.3

通讯作者: 季海冰 E-mail: jihb@zjemc.org.cn

引用本文:

季海冰,刘劲松,庞晓露. 石墨管涂覆-塞曼效应石墨炉原子吸收法测定土壤和沉积物中钡[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2007, 27(11): 2349-2352.
JI Hai-bing,LIU Jin-song,PANG Xiao-lu. Determination of Trace Barium in Soil and Sediment by Zeeman Graphite AAS with Coated Graphite Tube. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 27(11): 2349-2352.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2007/V27/I11/2349

[1] Ohanian E V, et al. Trace Subst. Environ. Health, 1983, 17(1): 109.
[2] XIA Yuan-xun(夏元洵). Toxicity Book of Chemical Substance(化学物质毒性全书). Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Literature Publishing Company(上海：上海科学技术文献出版社)，1991. 109.
[3] State Environmental Protection Administration(国家环保局编). Analysis Methods of Water and Wastewater Monitoring, the Fourth Edition(水和废水监测分析方法, 第4版). Beijing：China Environmental Science Publishing Company(北京: 中国环境科学出版社)，2002. 311.
[4] LIU Jia-ming, LAN Yi-bin, LIN Xuan(刘佳铭，蓝毅斌，林璇). Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(分析化学)，2002，30(9)：1148.
[5] WANG Yun-zhou, YANG Ze-biao, WANG Qi-guang, et al(王云舟，杨泽彪，王齐光，等). Chinese Journal of Spectroscopy Laboratory(光谱实验室)，2001，18(4)：468.
[6] LIU Xin-wen, CUI Su-jun(刘信文, 崔素君). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2001, 21(6): 852.
[7] XING Pei-zhi, LIAO Lei(邢培志，廖磊). Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology(中国卫生检验杂志)，2005，15(2)：177.
[8] OU Hong, CHEN Bin, HE Zhi-rong, et al(区红, 陈斌, 何志荣, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2002，22(1)：146.
[9] GAO Jia-you(高甲友). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2002，22(2)：320.
[10] JIN Shan(金姗). Analytical Laboratory(分析实验室)，1995，14(4)：57.
[11] TIE Mei, ZHANG Wei, LI Jing, et al(铁梅, 张葳, 李晶, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2006，26(1)：151.
[12] XIAO Shan-mei, CHEN Jian-rong, SHEN Yu-qin(肖珊美, 陈健荣, 沈玉勤). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2006，26(5)：955.
[13] HE Zi-ming(何自蓂). Rock and Mineral Analysis(岩矿测试), 1996, 15(2)：97.
[14] HAN Hua-yun, LIN Lin, CHEN Ke, et al(韩华云, 林琳, 陈克, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2002，22(1)：143.
[15] BU Hai-fu, XUN Xin, DOU Hong-man(卜海富, 孙昕, 窦红漫). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 1999, 19(5)：726.
[16] QI Wen-qi, CAO Jie-shan, LIN Shu-qin, et al(齐文启, 曹杰山, 林淑钦, 等). Environmental Monitoring of China(中国环境监测), 1990, 6(4): 13.
[17] JIAO Gen-xue，LEI Shu-juan(焦跟学, 雷淑娟). Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part B: Chemical Analysis(理化检验—化学分册)，1996，32(5)：280.