1. Department of History, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China 2. Department of Scientific History and Archaeometry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3. The Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100710, China 4. Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Abstract：Archaeological lime powders samples from Taosi and Yinxu sites, natural limestone and experimentally prepared lime mortar were investigated by means of Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) to identify the raw material of lime powders from Taosi and Yinxu sites. Results show that ν2/ν4 ratio of calcite resulted from carbonation reaction of man-made lime is around 6.31, which is higher than that of calcite in natural limestone and reflects the difference in the disorder of calcite crystal structure among the natural limestone and prepared lime mortar. With additional grinding, the values of ν2and ν4 in natural limestone and prepared lime mortar decrease. Meanwhile, the trend lines of ν2 versus ν4 for calcite in experimentally prepared lime mortar have a steeper slope when compared to calcite in natural limestone. These imply that ν2/ν4 ratio and the slope of the trend lines of ν2 versus ν4 can be used to determine the archaeological man-made lime.Based on the experiment results, it is possible that the archaeological lime powder from Taosi and Yinxu sites was prepared using man-made lime and the ancient Chinese have mastered the calcining technology of man-made lime in the late Neolithic period about 4 300 years ago.
[1] The Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Science(中国社会科学院考古研究所). Chinese Archaeology the Neolithic Age(中国考古学·新石器时代卷). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press(北京：中国社会科学出版社), 2010. [2] Wugong Excavating Team of the Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Science(中国社会科学院考古研究所陕西武功发掘队). Archaeology(考古), 1983, (5): 389. [3] Anhui Team of the Institute of Archaeology in Chinese Academy of Social Science, Culture Bureau of Mengcheng County(中国社会科学院考古研究所安徽工作队，蒙城县文化局). Archaeology(考古), 2005, (10): 3. [4] Dongxiafeng Archaeological Team(东下冯考古队). ActaArchaeologica Sinica(考古学报), 1983, (1): 55. [5] Anyang Team of the Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Science(中国社会科学院考古研究所安阳工作队). Acta Archaeologica Sinica(考古学报), 1985, (1): 33. [6] RONG Zhi-yi(容志毅). Studies in the History of Natural Sciences(自然科学史研究), 2011, 30(1): 45. [7] XIE Xi-gong(解希恭). Study on Taosi Site in Xiangfen(襄汾陶寺遗址研究). Beijing: Science Press(北京：科学出版社), 2007. [8] Experts Group of the Xia-Shang-Zhou Chronology Project(夏商周断代工程专家组). Results Report (1996-2000) on the Xia-Shang-Zhou Chronology Project(夏商周断代工程1996-2000年阶段成果报告). Beijing:World Publishing Corporation(北京：世界图书出版公司北京公司), 2000. [9] Vikki Chu, Lior Regev, Steve Weiner, et al. Journalof Archaeological Science, 2008, 35(1): 905. [10] Lior Regev, Kristin M. Poduska, Lia Addadi, et al. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010, 37(12): 3022. [11] Kristin M Poduska, Lior Regev, Elisabetta Boaretto, et al. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(4):550. [12] Kosednar-Legenstein B, Dietzel M, Leis A, et al. Applied Geochemistry, 2008, 23(8): 2425.
