Abstract：In order to in-situ detect the oil yield of oil shale, based on portable near infrared spectroscopy analytical technology, with 66 rock core samples from No.2 well drilling of Fuyu oil shale base in Jilin, the modeling and analyzing methods for in-situ detection were researched. By the developed portable spectrometer, 3 data formats (reflectance, absorbance and K-M function) spectra were acquired. With 4 different modeling data optimization methods: principal component-mahalanobis distance(PCA-MD) for eliminating abnormal samples, uninformative variables elimination (UVE) for wavelength selection and their combinations: PCA-MD+UVE and UVE+PCA-MD, 2 modeling methods: partial least square(PLS)and back propagation artificial neural network (BPANN), and the same data pre-processing, the modeling and analyzing experiment were performed to determine the optimum analysis model and method. The results show that the data format, modeling data optimization method and modeling method all affect the analysis precision of model. Results show that whether or not using the optimization method, reflectance or K-M function is the proper spectrum format of the modeling database for two modeling methods. Using two different modeling methods and four different data optimization methods, the model precisions of the same modeling database are different. For PLS modeling method, the PCA-MD and UVE+PCA-MD data optimization methods can improve the modeling precision of database using K-M function spectrum data format. For BPANN modeling method, UVE, UVE+PCA-MD and PCA-MD+UVE data optimization methods can improve the modeling precision of database using any of the 3 spectrum data formats. In addition to using the reflectance spectra and PCA-MD data optimization method, modeling precision by BPANN method is better than that by PLS method. And modeling with reflectance spectra, UVE optimization method and BPANN modeling method, the model gets the highest analysis precision, its correlation coefficient (RP) is 0.92, and its standard error of prediction (SEP) is 0.69%.
刘 杰, 张福东，滕 飞，李 军，王智宏* . 油页岩含油率近红外光谱原位分析方法研究 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2014, 34(10): 2779-2784.
LIU Jie, ZHANG Fu-dong, TENG Fei, LI Jun, WANG Zhi-hong* . Analyzing and Modeling Methods of Near Infrared Spectroscopy for In-situ Prediction of Oil Yield from Oil Shale. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34(10): 2779-2784.
[1] QIAN Jia-lin, YIN Liang(钱家麟, 尹 亮). Oilshale——The Alternative Energy for Petroleum(油页岩——石油的补充能源). Beijing：China Petrochemical Press(北京：中国石化出版社), 2008，1, 69. [2] The Mensuration of Oil Yield form Oilshale-Low Temperature Carbonization(油页岩含油率测定法(低温干馏法)), SH/T 0508—92. [3] Passey Q R.AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(12): 1777. [4] HE Jun-ling，DENG Shou-wei，CHEN Wen-long, et al(贺君玲，邓守伟，陈文龙, 等). Journal of Jilin University-Geoscience Edition(吉林大学学报·地球科学版), 2006, 36(6)：909. [5] Snyder R W, Painter P C, Conauer D C. Fuel., 1983, 62: 1205. [6] Alstadt K N, Katti D R, Katti K S. Spectrochimica Acta Part A, 2012, 89: 105. [7] XIE Fang-fang, WANG Ze, SONG Wen-li, et al(谢芳芳，王 泽，宋文立，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2011, 31(1): 914. [8] Romeo M J, Adams M J, Hind A R, et al. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2002, 10(3): 223. [9] LU Wan-zhen(陆婉珍). The Modern Analysis Technique of Near-Infrared Spectrum. 2nd ed.(现代近红外光谱分析技术，第2版). Beijing： China Petrochemical Press(北京：中国石化出版社), 2006，1, 30, 306. [10] CHU Xiao-li(褚小立). Molecular Spectroscopy Analytical Technology Combined with Chemometrics and Its Applications(化学计量学方法与分子光谱分析技术). Beijing：Chemical Industry Press(北京：化学工业出版社), 2011. 47, 61, 75, 80, 89, 259. [11] HAN Liang-liang, MAO Pei-sheng, WANG Xin-guo, et al(韩亮亮，毛培胜, 王新国, 等). J. Infrared Millim. Waves(红外与毫米波学报), 2009, 28(6): 423. [12] WU Di, WU Hong-xi, CAI Jing-bo, et al(吴 迪，吴洪喜，蔡景波，等). J. Infrared Millim. Waves (红外与毫米波学报), 2009, 28(6): 423.
