Abstract：Soluble solids (SSC) are an important index to evaluate the internal quality of Kubo peach. Traditional SSC content detection is destructive, time-consuming and laborious. Rapid and nondestructive detection of the SSC content of Kubo peach is of great importance for its quality classification. Binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO) is obtained by updating the speed formula based on standard particle swarm optimization (PSO). BPSO has the characteristics of high accuracy and fast convergence and is mostly used in optimization problems in separate spaces. Taking Kubo peach as the research object. Basedon hyperspectral technology combined with BPSO and based on BPSO combined characteristic wavelength selection algorithm to study the SSC content of Kubo peach. Firstly,hyperspectral information of 198 Kubo peaches was collected to obtain the spectral curve of Kubo peaches in the range of 900~1 700 nm. Meanwhile, theSSC value of Kubo peaches was. Used (Kennard-stone) algorithm to divide samples into a correction set (147) and a prediction set (51). The BPSO feature wavelength selection algorithm is used to extract the feature wavelength from Kubo's original spectral data. It is compared with the Competitive Adaptive Reweighting algorithm (CARS), Successive projections algorithm (SPA), and Uninformative variable selection algorithm (UVE). A method of extracting characteristic wavelength based on BPSO is proposed for primary combination (BPS0+CARS, BPSO+SPA, BPSO+UVE) and secondary combination ((BPSO+ CARS)-SPA), (BPSO+SPA)-SPA), (BPSO+UVE)-SPA). Based on the10 characteristic wavelength extraction methods above. Established support vector machine (LS-SVM) model and the genetic algorithm (GA) optimized support vector machine (GA-SVM) model of Kubo peach SSC content. The results show that the prediction performance of the model based on the BPSO algorithm is higher than that of other single characteristic wavelength algorithm, and the coefficient of determination R2p of the prediction set of the two models is above 0.97. Among the combination algorithms based on BPSO, the LS-SVM based on the quadratic combination (BPSO+SPA)-SPA algorithm has the highest prediction performance for Kubo peach SSC content when the number of characteristic wavelengths is small. The coefficient of determination between the correction set and the prediction set are 0.982 and 0.955, respectively. The root mean square errors RMSEC and RMSEP were 0.108 and 0.139, respectively. The prediction performance of the proposed model is slightly lower than that of the BPSO algorithm, but only 22 characteristic wavelengths are used for modeling, which greatly simplifies the model. These results show that (BPSO+SPA)-SPA is an effective method for extracting characteristic wavelength, which provides a new method for nondestructive detection of fruit SSC content.
张立秀，张淑娟，孙海霞，薛建新，景建平，崔添俞. 高光谱结合离散二进制粒子群算法对久保桃可溶性固形物含量的检测[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2024, 44(03): 656-662.
ZHANG Li-xiu, ZHANG Shu-juan, SUN Hai-xia, XUE Jian-xin, JING Jian-ping, CUI Tian-yu. Determination of Soluble Solid Content in Peach Based on Hyperspectral Combination With BPSO. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 44(03): 656-662.
[1] WANG You-sheng, WANG Sheng-jie, CHEN Xiao-yan, et al(王友升, 王胜杰, 陈小燕, 等). Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology(中国食品学报), 2016, 16(10): 214.
[2] Li X L, Wei Y Z, , Xu J, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2018, 143: 112.
[3] Li B, Yin Ha, Liu Y D, et al. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2022, 1265: 133407.
[4] Li Y J, Ma B X, Li C, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 193：106655.
[5] Li B C, Hou B L, Zhang D W, et al. Optik, 2016, 127(5): 2624.
[6] Fan S X, Zhang B H, Li J B, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2016, 121: 51.
[7] Wang T T, Li G H, Dai C L. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2022, 123: 104119.
[8] CAO Yin, YE Yun-tao, ZHAO Hong-li, et al(曹 引, 冶运涛, 赵红莉, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery(农业机械学报), 2018, 49(1): 173.
[9] ZHANG Jue, TIAN Hai-qing, ZHAO Zhi-yu, et al(张 珏, 田海清, 赵志宇，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2019, 35(1): 285.
[10] GUO Lu-bin, ZHAO Xiong-wen, GENG Sui-yan, et al(郭鲁斌, 赵雄文, 耿绥燕, 等). Electric Power Information and Communication Technology(电力信息与通信技术), 2021, 19(9): 8.
[11] LIU Jian-hua, YANG Rong-hua, SUN Shui-hua, et al(刘建华, 杨荣华, 孙水华, 等). Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Sciences Edition)[南京大学学报(自然科学版)], 2011, 47(5): 504.
[12] TANG Fei, HE Yong-yi(汤 飞, 何永义). Industrial Control Computer(工业控制计算机), 2021, 34(5): 83.
[13] SHEN Jia-jie, JIANG Hong, WANG Su(沈佳杰, 江 红, 王 肃). Computer Science(计算机科学), 2013, 40(S2): 125.
[14] XU Bao-ding, QIN Yu-hua, YANG Ning, et al（徐宝鼎, 秦玉华, 杨 宁，等）. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2019, 39(3): 717.
[15] Zhang X, Sun J L, Li P P, et al. LWT, 2021, 152：112295.
[16] HUANG Feng-hua, ZHANG Shu-juan, YANG Yi, et al(黄锋华, 张淑娟, 杨 一, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报）, 2015, 46(11): 252.
[17] Bonah E, Huang X Y, Yi R, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2020, 105: 103220.
[18] YU Feng-hua, XING Si-min, GUO Zhong-hui, et al(于丰华, 邢思敏, 郭忠辉，等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2022, 38(2): 175.
[19] Wang Z L, Chen J X, Fan Y F, et al. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020, 169: 105160.
[20] Chen X W, Dong Z Y, Liu J B et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2020, 243: 118786.
[21] Zhao H T, Feng Y Z, Chen W et al. Meat Science, 2019, 151: 75.
[22] WANG Ming-hai, GUO Wen-chuan, SHANG Liang, et al(王铭海，郭文川，商 亮，等). Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition)[西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)], 2014, 42(2): 142.
[23] MENG Qing-long, SHANG Jing, HUANG Ren-shuai, et al(孟庆龙, 尚 静, 黄人帅, 等). Packaging Engineering(包装工程), 2021, 42(3): 19.
