Non-Destructive Detection of Soluble Solids in Cherry Tomatoes by
Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Based on SG-CARS-IBP
ZHANG Fu1, 2, 3, CAO Wei-hua1, CUI Xia-hua1, WANG Xin-yue1, FU San-ling4*, ZHANG Ya-kun1
1. College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Machinery Equipment Advanced Manufacturing of Henan Province, Luoyang 471003, China
3. Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology, Ministry of Education, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
4. College of Physical Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
Abstract：The content of soluble solids (SSC) plays an essential role in the internal quality of cherry tomatoes. However, SSC detection has some problems based on hyperspectral imaging and dielectric properties. There are few SSC non-destructive testing models for cherry tomatoes currently. Therefore, in order to realize the non-destructive detection of SSC in cherry tomatoes, a prediction model of internal quality based on the spectral characteristics of cherry tomatoes and an improved BP neural network algorithm were proposed to solve the problem of rapid non-destructive detection of cherry tomatoes’ internal quality. In this study, cherry tomatoes were selected as the research object, and there were 188 test samples divided into a training set of 150 and a testing set of 38. The cherry tomatoes’ reflective intensity in 350~1 000 nm was obtained using the visible/near-infrared spectral acquisition system, and corrected sample reflectivity was obtained and analyzed. The practical information of the cherry tomatoes’ spectral in 481.15~800.03 nm was intercepted to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. A BP neural network prediction model was established by comparing the effective wavelengths treated by Savitzky-Golay smoothing (SG). The coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) for the test set were 0.578 5 and 0.563 9. On this basis, the network structure of the BP neural network was improved to seek the optimal prediction structure of the BP neural network. The error between the output layer and the expected value was calculated. The network structure parameters were adjusted, and the learning rate and the number of neurons were set to 0.01 and 5 to establish BP neural network model (SG-IBP). The R2 and RMSE of the test set were 0.981 2 and 0.102 3. While the R2 and RMSE of the test set were 0.997 8 and 0.047 9, with 18 feature lengths screened by the competitive adaptive reweighted sampling algorithm (CARS). Meanwhile, the speed was greatly improved. The results showed that the performance of the improved BP neural network model was significantly improved. After feature lengths were extracted by CARS, R2 of the test set was increased by 0.419 3, and RMSE was reduced by 0.516.The speed was also significantly improved. Therefore, the improved BP neural network model, which used CARS to extract characteristic lengths (SG-CARS-IBP), had apparent advantages, and the SG-CARS-IBP model was more suitable for studying cherry tomatoes’ SSC non-destructive detection. This study can provide a reference for efficient non-destructive detection of cherry tomatoes.
张 伏，曹炜桦，崔夏华，王新月，付三玲，张亚坤. 基于SG-CARS-IBP的圣女果可溶性固形物可见/近红外光谱无损检测[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2023, 43(03): 737-743.
ZHANG Fu, CAO Wei-hua, CUI Xia-hua, WANG Xin-yue, FU San-ling, ZHANG Ya-kun. Non-Destructive Detection of Soluble Solids in Cherry Tomatoes by
Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy Based on SG-CARS-IBP. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43(03): 737-743.
[1] FENG Yan, LI Chao-ping, ZHU Long-ying, et al(冯 岩, 李朝平, 朱龙英, 等). Molecular Plant Breeding(分子植物育种), 2022, 20(15): 5158.
[2] TIAN Hua, WANG Jin-ping, WANG Yuan(田 华, 汪金萍, 王 远). Food Research and Development(食品研究与开发), 2018, 39(11): 204.
[3] YANG Sheng-bao, TANG Ya-ping, YANG Tao, et al(杨生保, 唐亚萍, 杨 涛, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2017, 33(18): 285.
[4] JIANG Feng-li, SHEN Dian-zhao, YANG Lei, et al(姜凤利, 沈殿昭, 杨 磊, 等). Food Science(食品科学), 2022, 43(22): 353.
[5] Zhang D, Xu Y, Huang W, et al. Infrared Physics & Technology, 2019, 98: 297.
[6] SHEN Ya-qi, LI Song-lin, HE Jie, et al(申亚其, 李松林, 何 杰, 等). Forestry Machinery & Woodworking Equipment(林业机械与木工设备), 2021, 49(3): 4.
[7] LIU Yan, ZHOU Xin-qi, YU Xiao-feng, et al(刘 妍, 周新奇, 俞晓峰, 等). Journal of Zhejiang University·Agric. & Life Sci.(浙江大学学报·农业与生命科学版), 2020, 46(1): 27.
[8] WANG Ruo-lin, WANG Dong, REN Xiao-lin, et al(王若琳, 王 栋, 任小林, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2018, 34(5): 129.
[9] TANG Yu-rong, ZHANG Hong, CAO Xin-xin, et al(唐玉荣, 张 宏, 曹昕昕, 等). Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences(河南农业科学), 2017, 46(3): 148.
[10] Mishra P, Woltering E, Brouwer B, et al. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2021, 171: 1.
[11] Nordey T, Joas J, Davrieux F, et al. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 216: 51.
[12] XU Sai, LU Hua-zhong, WANG Xu, et al(徐 赛, 陆华忠, 王 旭, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2021, 37(21): 287.
[13] XU Xin, MA Zhao-wu, XIONG Shu-ping, et al(许 鑫, 马兆务, 熊淑萍, 等). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(中国农业科技导报), 2022, 24(2): 136.
[14] WANG Nai-xiao, WANG Xi-lin, TAN Xin-ran, et al(王乃啸, 王希林, 覃歆然, 等). Proceedings of the CSEE(中国电机工程学报), 2020, 40(4): 1378.
[15] DING Zhen, CHANG Bo-shen(丁 震, 常博深). Industry and Mine Automation (工矿自动化), 2021, 47(12): 93.
