低山丘陵坡耕地秸秆覆盖轮耕土壤WSOC的荧光特征

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)12-3872-07

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (8)

全文: PDF (4052 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：为了提高坡耕地的秸秆还田效率，增加土壤有机质，探索一种适于坡耕地的基于种养结合的保护性耕作方式。采用田间小区试验，研究了秸秆覆盖轮耕技术（包括当季秸秆覆盖+休闲、上季秸秆覆盖+旋耕）与常规耕作（秸秆移除后旋耕）对土壤水溶性有机碳（WSOC）荧光特征及团聚体有机碳的影响。结果表明：砂质暗棕壤坡耕地秸秆覆盖旋耕（SRT）、秸秆覆盖休闲（SFT）与秸秆不还田的常规耕作（CRT）处理土壤WSOC均解析出C1，C2，C3和C4等4组荧光组分，主要为紫外光区与可见光区类富里酸（Peak A 和Peak C）、类胡敏酸（F）和短波类色氨酸（类蛋白B、D峰）等成分。秸秆覆盖旋耕处理提高了类富里酸（Peak A和Peak C）和类蛋白组分C4含量，C1和C2组分较覆盖休闲和常规耕作分别提高112.73%，109.35%和107.77%，66.07%，C4组分较SFT与CRT处理提高28.26%和42.31%，差异显著，而常规耕作处理来自于自生源腐殖质组分的胡敏酸C3含量增加，较覆盖旋耕和覆盖休闲处理分别增加16.76%和49.74%；0～20 cm耕层土壤团聚体有机物主要分布在<0.053 mm的矿物质结合态（MOM）中，平均占比为63.90%，其次为0.25～0.053 mm细颗粒态有机物（oPOM），占比为23.8%，粗颗粒态有机物（>0.25 mm）中含量最低，仅为11.2%；与秸秆不还田比较，坡耕地秸秆覆盖还田增加了植物来源的新鲜有机质的形成，表现为＞0.053 mm的闭蓄态有机碳（oPOC）含量的增加，以覆盖旋耕处理oPOC增加较大，而秸秆不还田的CRT处理增加了MOM占比；覆盖旋耕处理FI和HIX值增大，土壤腐殖质积累趋势增强，为低山丘陵区坡耕地实施秸秆覆盖还田的保护性耕作技术提供了科学依据。

关键词：坡耕地；秸秆覆盖；轮耕；WSOC；荧光特征

Abstract：In order to improve the efficiency of straw returning and increase the soil organic carbon, a protective tillage method based on the combination of planting and feeding on sloping farmland was explored. The effects of straw mulching and rotation tillage technology on soil water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) fluorescence characteristics and aggregate organic carbon through field experiments were studied, which included current season straw mulching and leisure, last season straw mulching and rotary tillage. Compared with conventional farming, which was rotating tillage after straw removal. The results show that WSOC resolved into 4 groups C₁, C₂, C₃, C₄, under the above three treatments on the sandy dark brown soil, in which fluorescent components mainly include fulvic acid (Peak A and Peak C)in the ultraviolet and visible regions and humic acid (F) and short-wave tryptophan (protein-like B, D peaks) and other components. SRT treatment increased the content of fulvic acid (Peak A and Peak C) and protein-like component C₄. Compared with SFT and CRT, whose components of C₁ and C₂ increased by 112.73%, 109.35% and 107.77%, 66.07% and the group C₄ increased by 28.26% and 42.31%, the difference was significant. While increased the content of humic acid C₃ from the autogenic humus componentunder the CRT treatment was increased by 16.76% and 49.74% compared with the SRT and SFT treatments. Soil aggregate organic matter in 0～20 cm cultivated layer was mainly distributed in the mineral bound state (MOM) of <0.053 mm, with an average proportion of 63.90%, followed by 0.25～0.053 mm fine particulate organic matter (oPOM), accounting for 23.8%, and the content of coarse-grained organic matter (>0.25 mm) was the lowest, only 11.2%. SRT treatment significantly increased the content of oPOC, and the values of FI and HIX increased, which means the accumulation of soil humus increased. The accumulation trend was strengthened, providing a scientific basis for implementing protective tillage techniques for straw mulching and returning to the field in low mountain and hilly areas.

Key words：Sloping farmland; Straw mulch; Rotation; WSOC; Fluorescence characteristics

收稿日期: 2021-11-30 修订日期: 2022-03-10

中图分类号:

S-3

基金资助: 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD1500704, 2022YFD1500305)，国家大豆产业技术体系（CARS-04），黑龙江省产业协同技术体系课题资助

通讯作者: 王根林 E-mail: wanggenlin2005@163.com

作者简介: 李玉梅，女，1971年生，黑龙江省黑土保护利用研究院研究员 e-mail: Liyumeiwxyl@126.com

引用本文:

李玉梅，王楠楠，刘峥宇，王根林，时妍，王伟，于洪久，张磊. 低山丘陵坡耕地秸秆覆盖轮耕土壤WSOC的荧光特征[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(12): 3872-3878.
LI Yu-mei, WANG Nan-nan, LIU Zheng-yu, WANG Gen-lin, SHI Yan, WANG Wei, YU Hong-jiu, ZHANG Lei. Fluorescence Characteristics of Soil WSOC Under Straw Cover Rotation on Slope Farmland of Low Mountains and Hills. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 42(12): 3872-3878.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2022)12-3872-07 或 https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2022/V42/I12/3872

[1] CAO Ying-fei, ZHANG Hong, LIU Ke, et al（曹莹菲, 张红, 刘克，等）. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery（农业机械学报）, 2016, 47(9): 212.
[2] CAO Ying-fei, ZHANG Hong, ZHAO Cong, et al(曹莹菲，张红，赵聪，等). Journal of Agro-Environment Science(农业环境科学学报)，2016, 35（5）: 976.
[3] CHEN Hai-tao, CHAI Yu-duo, HOU Shou-yin, et al(陈海涛, 柴誉铎, 侯守印, 等). Journal of Northeast Agricultural University(东北农业大学学报), 2019, 50(9): 79.
[4] CAI Tai-yi, HUANG Hui-juan, HUANG Yao-wei, et al(蔡太义 , 黄会娟, 黄耀威, 等). Journal of Natural Resources(自然资源学报), 2012, 27(6): 964.
[5] LIANG Yi-cang, WANG Jun, LIU Quan-quan, et al(梁贻仓, 王俊, 刘全全, 等). Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas(干旱地区农业研究), 2014, 32(5): 161.
[6] BAO Shi-dan(鲍士旦). Analytical Methods for Soil and Agrohemistry(土壤农化分析). 3rd Edition（第3版）. Beijing: China Agriculture Press(北京：中国农业出版社), 2000.
[7] CAO Jia-rui, GONG Ke-yang, BIE Yu-jing, et al(曹佳锐, 龚可杨, 别宇静, 等). Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2021, 41(19): 7679.
[8] LI Yu-mei, WANG Gen-lin, LI Cheng-yang, et al(李玉梅, 王根林, 李承阳, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2020. 40(4): 1232.
[9] YAN Lei, DONG Tian-hao, LA Yue-peng（闫雷, 董天浩, 喇乐鹏）. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering（农业工程学报）, 2020, 36(22): 181.
[10] GE Xuan-liang, QIAN Chun-rong, GONG Xiu-jie, et al(葛选良, 钱春荣, 宫秀杰, 等). Northeast Agricultural Sciences(东北农业科学), https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1376.s.20211029.1836.006.html.
[11] WANG Tao, MA Yu-dan, XU Ya-dong, et al(王涛, 马宇丹, 许亚东, 等). Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 2018, 37(7): 2083.
[12] ZHENG Ju-feng, CHEN Shuo-tong(郑聚锋, 陈硕桐). Science(科学), 2021, 73(6): 13.
[13] ZHOU Huan, CAI Li-qun, ZHANG Ren-zhi, et al(周欢, 蔡立群, 张仁陟, 等). Journal of Gansu Agricultural University（甘肃农业大学学报）, 2015, 50(1): 63.