1. 安徽理工大学材料科学与工程学院,安徽 淮南 232001
2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston Texas 77204, USA
Structural Characterization and Molecular Model Construction of Gas-Fat Coal With High Sulfur in Shanxi
GE Tao1,2, LI Yang1, WANG Meng2, LI Fen1, ZHANG Ming-xu1
1. Department of Material Science & Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston Texas 77204, USA
Abstract:Gas-fat coal is one of the main coal types of coking coal. To study the structure of high sulfur gas fat coal and construct a molecular structural unit model is of great significance for desulfurization and upgrading, optimizing coking coal blending and saving high quality coking coal resources. The high sulfur gas-fat coal in Gaoyang mining area in Shanxi was selected. Its carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur structural characteristics were characterized by FTIR, 13C CP/MAS-NMR and XPS. The molecular structure unit model of Gaoyang high sulfur gas-fat coal was constructed by combining the results of coal quality analysis, calculate aromatic structure, fat structure and hetero atom structure parameters. The results show that the hydroxy π hydrogen bond formed by π electrons on the aromatic ring is the most important hydroxy structure of Gaoyang high sulfur gas fat coal, accounting for 73.20%. Hydroxyl self-association hydrogen bond, ether oxygen bond and hydroxyl group form a high hydrogen bond content, accounting for 24.38% of the total hydroxyl groups. The free hydroxyl content is only 2.42%, and the association structure in coal is mainly in the form of the multimer. Conjugated carbonyl and phenolic hydroxyl are mainly forms of the oxygen containing functional groups. The aryl ether and carboxyl groups are low. Methylene is the most important aliphatic hydrocarbon structure. Accounting for 41.85%. The proportion of methyl and methine groups was 29.86 and 28.29% respectively. The aromatic hydrocarbon structure mainly has three forms of benzene ring penta-substituted, benzene ring tri-substituted and benzene ring tetra-substituted, accounting for 41.42%, 30.65% and 19.82%, respectively. The aromatic hydrogen ratio and the aromatic carbon ratio is 0.34~0.35 and 0.73~0.77 respectively. The average structure size of the aromatic nucleus Xb was 0.43. The contents of thiophene, (sub)sulfone, thioether (thiol) and inorganic sulfur in coal is 35.90%, 27.61%, 18.40% and 18.09% respectively. Nitrogen is mainly present in the structure of pyridine and pyrrole, with less protonated pyridine and nitrogen oxides. The molecular structure unit has 118 aromatic carbon atoms, 5 carboxyl groups and carbonyl groups, 35 aliphatic hydrocarbon atoms, and 8, 2, 2 oxygen, sulfur and nitrogen atoms. According to the analysis of the structure of heteroatoms in coal. It is determined that the molecular structure model unit contains functional groups such as thiophene, sulfoxide, pyridine, pyrrole, phenolic hydroxyl group, ether oxygen bond and the like. The molecular structure unit model of high-yang high-sulfur gas fat coal with molecular formula C165H128O8N2S2 was constructed.
葛 涛,李 洋,WANG Meng,李 芬,张明旭. 山西高硫气肥煤结构表征与分子模型构建[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40(11): 3373-3378.
GE Tao, LI Yang, WANG Meng, LI Fen, ZHANG Ming-xu. Structural Characterization and Molecular Model Construction of Gas-Fat Coal With High Sulfur in Shanxi. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 40(11): 3373-3378.
[1] Hiroyuki K. Fuel Processing Technology, 2019, 188(1): 105.
[2] Manoj B. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2016,3(2):123.
[3] GE Tao, ZHANG Ming-xu, CAI Chuan-chuan(葛 涛, 张明旭, 蔡川川). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2017, 42(S2): 500.
[4] You Z, Boris A, Yuling W, et al. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2018, 40(12): 1.
[5] Baysl M, Yildiz B. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2016, 163: 166.
[6] HAN Feng, ZHANG Yan-guo, MENG Ai-hong, et al(韩 峰, 张衍国, 蒙爱红,等). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2014, 39(11): 2293.
[7] AN Wen-bo, WANG Lai-gui, LIU Xiang-feng, et al(安文博, 王来贵, 刘向峰,等). Polymer Bulletin(高分子通报), 2018, (3): 67.
[8] GE Tao, MA Xiang-mei, ZHANG Ming-xu(葛 涛, 马祥梅, 张明旭). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2017, 37(8):2146.
[9] XU Fang, LIU Hui, WANG qing, et al(徐 芳, 刘 辉, 王 擎,等). Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(化工学报), 2017, 68(11): 4272.
[10] Yang Fan, Hou Yucui, Wu Weize, et al. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31: 12072.
[11] Tang Yuegang, Huan Xuan, Lan Chunyuan. Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition), 2018, 92(3): 1218.
[12] Phiri Z, Everson R C, Neomagus H W J P, et al. Applied Energy, 2018, 216: 414.
[13] WEI Shuai, YAN Guo-chao, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, et al(魏 帅, 严国超, 张志强,等). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2018, 43(2): 555.
[14] QIN Zhi-hong, BU Liang-hui, LI Xiang(秦志宏, 卜良辉, 李 祥). Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology(燃料化学学报), 2018, 46(12): 1409.