面向地质应用的航空高光谱CASI-SASI数据大气校正方法对比研究

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)09-2677-09

摘要
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (6785 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要：蚀变信息提取是高光谱遥感地质应用的重要内容。基于特殊吸收峰的蚀变矿物提取是蚀变信息提取的重要手段。由于大气的吸收和散射作用，为了获得更为真实的地物反射光谱，必须进行大气校正。目前，国内外针对大气校正的对比研究主要集中在大气校正前后图像的质量改善、地物分类效果的提升以及校正图像像元光谱与实际地物光谱的相关关系等方面，而对不同校正方法获得的像元光谱与实际光谱吸收峰位的对应情况则很少讨论，这对于依赖吸收峰特征进行蚀变矿物提取的地质遥感极为不利。利用CASI-SASI航空高光谱成像系统，采集了甘肃龙首山地区的航空高光谱遥感数据，并运用ASD光谱仪，对该地区实际地物光谱进行了测量。以此为基础，开展了FLAASH、快速大气校正（QUAC）、经验线（EMPL）等方法大气校正结果的对比研究。通过对比分析，发现FLAASH，QUAC和EMPL均能在一定程度上消除大气的影响，改善航空高光谱遥感的图像质量，但EMPL方法得到的反射率与实际反射率相关性最好。此外，运用人工目视方法开展了实际地物反射光谱的吸收峰位与不同校正方法得到的对应像元反射光谱的吸收峰位的对比研究，发现不同校正方法得到的像元光谱的吸收峰位与实际峰位均存在不同程度的差异，虽然EMPL对吸收峰位的保留效果最好，但依然有“漏峰”的现象。据此，提出运用多种大气校正方法开展综合研究，以提高不同类型的蚀变带定位准确度。

关键词：高光谱遥感；CASI/SASI；大气校正；对比分析

Abstract：Alteration information extraction is one of the most important aspects of hypersepctral remote sensing application, and alteration mineral identification based on special absorption peaks is an important means of alteration information extraction. Due to the absorption and scattering of the atmosphere, atmospheric correction must be performed in order to obtain a more realistic reflection spectrum of the ground object. At present, comparison researches on atmospheric correction mainly focus on the improvement of image quality before and after atmospheric correction, the improvement of the classification effect of different features, and the correlation between the corrected image pixel spectrum and the actual spectrum. In contrast, the correspondence between absorption peaks of pixel spectrum obtained using different atmospheric correction and actual spectrum is rarely discussed, which is extremely unfavorable for geological application of hyperspectral remote sensing that is based on identification of mineral absorption peaks. In this study, the CASI-SASI aeronautical hyperspectral imaging system was used to collect the airborne hyperspectral data of the Longshoushan area of Gansu Province. Additionally, spectra of terrain objects were obtained using ground based ASD spectrometer. Based on these datasets, a geological application oriented comparison research on FLAASH, QUAC, and EMPL atmospheric correction methods was conducted. The results suggest that FLAASH, QUAC, and EMPL can eliminate the effects of the atmosphere and improve the image quality of aerial hyperspectral remote sensing, and EMPL shows the best effect. Besides, the absorption peaks of terrain objects’ reflection spectra and corresponded pixel reflection spectra obtained with different atmospheric correction were compared using visual interpretation. It is found that the absorption peaks of pixel spectra have different degrees of differences from those of the real terrain object spectra. Although EMPL has the best retention, some absorption peaks are still error corresponded, suggesting that multiple atmospheric correction methods should be used and a comprehensive research should be carried to improve the alteration extraction accuracy.

Key words：Hyperspectral remote sensing; CASI/SASI; Atmospheric correction; Comparison research

收稿日期: 2018-08-10 修订日期: 2019-01-22

中图分类号:

基金资助: 中核集团龙腾二期项目（遥LTY1604），国家自然科学基金项目（41772354），中国核工业集团公司优先发展技术项目（遥YX162），国防预研项目（3210402），中国核工业集团公司铀矿地质生产中科研项目（遥D1808）资助

通讯作者: 王建刚 E-mail: minsk_an@163.com

作者简介: 叶发旺，1974年生，核工业北京地质研究院高级工程师(研究员级) e-mail: yfwbeijing2008@sina.com

引用本文:

叶发旺，王建刚，邱骏挺，张川. 面向地质应用的航空高光谱CASI-SASI数据大气校正方法对比研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(09): 2677-2685.
YE Fa-wang, WANG Jian-gang, QIU Jun-ting, ZHANG Chuan. A Geological Application Oriented Comparison Research on Different Atmospheric Correction Methods for Airborne CASI-SASI Hyperspectral Data. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(09): 2677-2685.

链接本文:

https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2019)09-2677-09 或 https://www.gpxygpfx.com/CN/Y2019/V39/I09/2677

[1] LI Zhi-zhong，WANG Da-ming，LIU De-chang，et al(李志忠，汪大明，刘德长，等). Journal of China University of Geosciences·Earth Science(中国地质大学学报·地球科学)，2015，40(8): 1287.
[2] YE Fa-wang，LIU De-chang(叶发旺，刘德长). Journal of Geo-Information Science(地球信息科学学报)，2012，14(4): 548.
[3] YE Fa-wang，LIU De-chang，ZHAO Ying-jun(叶发旺，刘德长，赵英俊). World Nuclear Geoscience(世界核地质科学)，2011，28(4): 231.
[4] YE Fa-wang，LIU De-chang，ZHAO Ying-jun，et al(叶发旺，刘德长，赵英俊，等). World Nuclear Geoscience(世界核地质科学)，2012，29(4): 214.
[5] Ye Fawang，Meng Shu，Zhang Chuan，et al. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2018, 92(2): 395.
[6] LIU De-chang，TIAN Feng，QIU Jun-ting，et al(刘德长，田丰，邱骏挺，等). Acta Geologica Sinica(地质学报)，2017，91(12): 2781.
[7] LIU De-chang，ZHAO Ying-jun，YANG Xu(刘德长，赵英俊，杨旭). Remote Sensing for Land & Resources(国土资源遥感)，2010，(1): 14.
[8] ZHANG Chuan，YE Fa-wang，XU Qing-jun，et al(张川，叶发旺，徐清俊，等). Remote Sensing for Land & Resources(国土资源遥感)，2017，29(2): 160.
[9] GAN Fu-ping，DONG Xin-feng，YAN Bai-kun，et al(甘甫平，董新丰，闫柏琨，等). Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology·Natural Science Edition(南京信息工程大学学报·自然科学版)，2018，10(1): 44.
[10] WANG Zheng-hai，DUAN Jian-jun，GENG Xin(王正海，段建军，耿欣). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用)，2011，26(4): 432.
[11] ZHANG Peng，WANG Xue-qiang(张鹏，王学强). Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences(安徽农业科学)，2014，42(10): 3105.
[12] ZHANG Yu-chen，ZHANG Ting-bin，YI Gui-hua，et al(张雨晨，张廷斌，易桂花，等). Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology(测绘与空间地理信息)，2015，38(10): 38.
[13] LUO Su-qun，LIU Qiao-yuan(罗素群，刘巧圆). Industrial Control Computer(工业控制计算机)，2016，29(11): 111.
[14] LI Zheng-qiang，CHEN Xing-feng，MA Yan，et al(李正强，陈兴峰，马龑，等). Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology·Natural Science Edition(南京信息工程大学学报·自然科学版)，2018，10(1): 6.
[15] BIAN Fu-qiang，FAN Dong-dong，FU Dan-yu(边福强，范东栋，傅丹膺). Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics(大气与环境光学学报)，2018，24(1): 65.
[16] PAN Cen-cen，YAN Qing-wu，DING Jian-wei，et al(潘岑岑，闫庆武，丁建伟，等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析)，2018，38(1): 224.
[17] WU Bin，MIAO Fang，YE Cheng-ming，et al(吴彬，苗放，叶成名，等). Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration(物探化探计算技术)，2010，32(4): 442.
[18] SHEN Yan，NIU Zheng，CHEN Fang，et al(沈艳，牛铮，陈方，等). Geography and Geo-information Science(地理与地理信息科学)，2007，(1): 27.